The feminist fightback against Italy’s lockdown

Protesters say that school closures have revived a 1950s division of the sexes.

Julian Vigo


The Italian government has started to loosen the lockdown. ‘Phase two’ was rolled out across the country on 4 May. One blatant omission from the new measures, which is being felt across the country, was the return of schools and childcare. Indeed, for parents and children across Italy, there is no ‘phase two’.

Because so little has changed for parents, the streets in towns across Italy this week look remarkably similar to how they did during lockdown. While some Italians in a limited number of professions have returned to work, there is still a notable absence of children.

During phase two, parents with children have been largely unable to take advantage of the newly granted freedom to go to parks. Children’s playgrounds – a standard feature of almost all parks around the country – are still off-limits. Parents know that bringing their children to parks only to have to tell them to stay away from the one part of the park that interests them would cause conflict – something which most families are hoping to avoid at a time when they are struggling to hold it together both economically and mentally. As a result, many families remain inside. Some hope that this rule will change soon or, at the very least, that in the regions where beaches have been closed, that those beaches might soon start to be opened.

Equally problematic is the fact that parents are largely unable to return to work because schools are not expected to reopen until September. Education minister Lucia Azzolina recently announced that schools are likely to be ‘part-time’, with children conducting much of their learning online from home. But so far, online learning has been an unmitigated disaster. An estimated 1.6million children have no internet access at home. Many students don’t have personal computers, either. With no schools to look after their children, some parents are forced to stay at home, foregoing work. It has largely been women who have given up their work lives – and many are not happy about this.

I spoke with Costanza Margiotta, associate professor in legal theory at the University of Padua, who launched the action group Priorità alla Scuola (Priority on School). Margiotta tells me how she managed to mobilise over 82,000 parents to sign an open letter to the education secretary on 18 April.

‘The battle started in Florence’, she tells me. The mayor was called on to offer an alternative interpretation of the prime minister’s first nationwide lockdown decree of 9 March. Many parents were worried that they could be fined if they went outside for a walk with their children. ‘During lockdown, this was a right only reserved for dog owners’, she explained. ‘We won that battle because we obtained a positive interpretation from the city administration’.

Thanks in part to another of Margiotta’s letters – this time to the mayor of Florence on 25 March – single parents were eventually permitted to go shopping with their children. This was also prohibited at first, as only one family member could shop at a time. The mayor of Florence then managed to lobby the Ministry of Interior to issue new rules allowing single parents to go to the supermarket with their children.

The ongoing struggle is education. Margiotta wrote her open letter to the education minister urging her to clarify what was happening with the reopening of the schools. All of the information was coming from the media, but there was nothing from the government, she tells me: ‘I drafted the letter and I invited my old friends from university in Bologna, and then others from all over Italy joined in. We created Priorità alla Scuola and circulated the letter around the country.’ Margiotta tells me that 72 per cent of the signatories are women.

In Rome, feminist signatories to the Priorità alla Scuola letter organised a protest on 1 May. They demonstrated in front of five schools, unfurling banners which read: ‘Without school we cannot return to work.’ ‘We broke the silence’, says Margiotta, ‘but this in itself doesn’t mean we will get what we want’. Margiotta reiterates why this is so important:

‘To force women to stay at home to take care of their children while also forcing them into the role as de facto educators will completely forego the child’s right to education and to the socialisation that is built from interactions with their peers. It follows that if children cannot be emancipated from the family context for learning, then this would harshly punish women by putting us back to the 1950s.’

Margiotta is not alone in this fear. Hella Network, a collective of over 500 female communication professionals, has also pushed back on the Italian government’s refusal to address the rights of women and children. Recently, Hella Network produced a satirical version of the Italian government’s lockdown campaign. Similarly entitled #IoRestoaCasa (#IStayAtHome), the campaign challenges the threat to women’s physical, economic and political autonomy posed by the post-coronavirus world. It says: ‘In phase two, but also in phase three and thereafter, we will be the most penalised in the professional environment. And the most disadvantaged among us will be mothers.’

The campaign borrows visual elements from the iconography of postwar imagery of women as homemakers, smiling at the viewer. Its graphics feature slogans like ‘#IStayAtHome to admire my Bachelor’s degree in a frame’ and ‘#IStayAtHome with the children because I am economically expendable’. The bottom of each frame features recent employment statistics showing women’s participation in the labour force.

One reason that women’s needs and rights have been secondary could be that there are so few women driving the strategy. Many Italians expect the government and its experts to ignore women’s issues – especially after Azzolina’s declaration last week that long-distance learning had been a ‘success’. Even Italian fathers are alarmed at some of the conclusions being drawn by the national government, noting the detrimental effects that the lack of education and childcare is having on their families and on society. As a partial remedy, the government is offering €600 per month in babysitting vouchers, but this would not cover the childcare needed to return to even a part-time job.

Margiotta tells me that Priorità alla Scuola is organising protests later this month throughout the country as discussions are ongoing between parents, educators and the government. Other groups are forming, too. For instance, a network of teachers and parents has emerged to produce a ‘Manifesto for the rights and wishes of girls, boys and adolescents’. This advocates for the right of children to access education and outdoor spaces while demanding radically different contagion containment measures that do not punish children and women disproportionately.

It is now a week into ‘phase two’ of the lockdown and I have yet to meet a single parent who is not outraged by the fact that their lives and those of their children have been treated as an afterthought to reopening the country. Talks have begun about restarting sports training so that the Italian Football Federation’s Serie A can finish its 2019 / 2020 season. Factories and even restaurants are starting to reopen. But at the same time, many Italians are concerned that families have been left behind.

Julian Vigo is a writer and academic.

Let’s cancel cancel culture

Free speech is under attack from all sides – from illiberal laws, from a stifling climate of conformity, and from a powerful, prevailing fear of being outed as a heretic online, in the workplace, or even among friends, for uttering a dissenting thought. This is why we at spiked are stepping up our fight for speech, expanding our output and remaking the case for this most foundational liberty. But to do that we need your help. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you want to support us, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can find out more and sign up here. Thank you! And keep speaking freely.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Jerry Owen

14th May 2020 at 4:06 pm

I tend to have more sympathy for feminist demonstrations if they have their baps out…. Call me old fashioned.

Gareth Edward KING

13th May 2020 at 7:28 pm

Germany isn’t really up to baling anybody out after this week’s Supreme Court decisión in Karlsruhe making it clear that the Bundesbank isn’t obliged to continue contributing to the ECB on which the rest of the Eurozone depends.
It’s good that there’s been some kind of fightback in Italy as in Spain it’s beginning to resemble a bad day from the ‘Village of the Damned’. The fear is palpable and it’s giving me a serious case of the heebie-geebies. I’d say that 90% of the populace in Madrid wear face masks on all occasions-including windy days in the local park (those that are open, of course)! It’s not even a ‘legal requirement’ although it is on public transport where every other seat has the ‘helpful’ bumper sticker ‘forbidden to sit here’ on it! What IS going on? Spain’s GDP depends at the rate of 12% on tourism and another 7% on hospitality, the latter of which there is next to none. The innumerable bars and restaurants in Madrid which are supposed to have a ceiling of 30% full capacity will fail, how are they even supposed to pay basic running costs on so few clients? This dystopian two metres ‘social distancing’ is a non-starter. Who’d want to spend time in a bar with those kind of measures in operation? Fun? I don’t see it. The BBC, I see, put out a propaganda video which was set in Cuenca (one of Spain’s depopulated provinces, so hardly ‘typical’) as it went into Phase I of these so-called de-escalation measures. It showed people enjoying their breakfast on their OWN (difficult in the capital) and it also showed those kids hugging THEMSELVES as they met at their relations’ home! Was that supposed to be part of the sinister ‘new normal’? It’s totally creepy and the parents need to remind their kids to get a grip, and to stop worrying themselves sick about this pesky covid-19 which’ll finish off the country economy-wise and socially before too long.


13th May 2020 at 6:44 pm

In Britain most teaching is useless-aren’t 50% pupils at 16 basically illiterate? As teachers are really only childminders and they are too afraid to go back why not send in the army? They can give the children physical training all day as it is now late Spring/Early Summer on playing fields , so everyone suitably distanced. Seconday school pupils from age 12/13 are old enough to stay at home and do on-line lessons until schools fully open.

Mark Houghton

13th May 2020 at 4:23 pm

I just think it’s scandalous all those poor women with no access to viable contraception and having no choice but to have children against their will.

Jim Lawrie

13th May 2020 at 1:27 pm

Becoming clear is the reliance on state money of so many women to subsidise their “professions” and single parent choice, thus shifting taxpayer money from one column to the next on the ever sprawling spreadsheet. To borrow that money Italy now has to pay interest rates that are constantly creepin up, or ask Germany to pay the difference.

Gweedo LeStrange

13th May 2020 at 6:04 pm

Agreed. Feminists always squeal about a “return to the 1950s” whenever their unearned privileges are under threat. Although this article omits any mention of men’s parenting or financial duties during the lockdown, I don’t hear them whining about it. I really wish Spiked would stop giving feminist parasites the oxygen of publicity.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.

Deplorables — a spiked film