Child gambling on the rise? I wouldn’t bet on it

The Gambling Commission’s latest figures show the kids are all right.

Jon Bryan

Share
Topics Politics

Every year, the Gambling Commission publishes research on young people and gambling just in time for some of the stats to be splashed across horror headlines around Halloween. ‘Now 55,000 children are gambling addicts – quadruple the number only three years ago’, thundered the Daily Mail, to give one example.

Labour’s Tom Watson quoted the same figure to claim that, ‘Levels of gambling among children remain stubbornly high. One child gambling addict is too many, let alone 55,000.’ Watson also criticised the government’s ‘soft-touch approach to gambling regulation’ and promised major gambling reform under a Labour government. The Church of England also weighed in. It said the ‘crisis’ of child gambling is ‘a national scandal’.

You could be forgiven for thinking that we were seeing a continued increase in figures which indicate a significant problem, and that we need new gambling laws to change behaviour and restrict access. But look beneath the headlines and there is actually a great deal of positive news in the Gambling Commission’s report.

The report makes clear that, ‘The long-term trend shows a decline in [gambling] participation since the questions were first asked in 2011’. Surely this is something to celebrate? And yet it is barely remarked upon because it doesn’t fit the dominant narrative – that gambling by children is out of control and we need more regulation.

In the most recent survey, 11 per cent of 11- to 16-year-olds said they had spent their own money on gambling in the past seven days, compared to 14 per cent in 2018. Tom Watson uses this figure to claim that ‘one in 10 children is gambling every week’.

But again, scratch the surface a little and things are not as dire as they appear. The most prevalent form of gambling among young people is having a bet with a friend. In other words, kids are saying to each other: ‘I bet you two quid that United lose again this weekend.’ The stats do not say that large numbers of kids are nipping into the bookies – illegally – on the way home from school or are placing bets online.

More good news found by the research is that the ‘majority of young people think that gambling is dangerous and feel well-informed about the risks (59 per cent and 60 per cent respectively)’.

Gambling advertising should not cause undue concern, either. For example, although ‘69 per cent of young people have seen or heard some form of gambling adverts or sponsorships’, it appears that this has not had the kind of impact that many fear. Eighty-three per cent of respondents said that ‘gambling adverts have not prompted them to spend money on gambling when they were not otherwise planning to’.

There is also some good news on how we as a society are bringing up children. Half of young people ‘have been spoken to about the potential problems that gambling can lead to’. And three quarters (74 per cent) ‘know who they would go to for help if they had problems related to gambling’.

More parents and guardians set rules about gambling than don’t (23 per cent versus 20 per cent). And the majority of children also said that they would go to their parents for help if they needed it, with parents and guardians the first port of call for more than half of children.

Horror headlines – accurate or not – will often lead to calls for more regulation and restrictions. Of course, it is totally understandable to worry about children and gambling, but this research should provide some reassurance.

Jon Bryan is treasurer of The Great Debate. He regularly plays poker and tweets about gambling at @JonBryanPoker.

Picture by: Getty.

Let’s cancel cancel culture

Free speech is under attack from all sides – from illiberal laws, from a stifling climate of conformity, and from a powerful, prevailing fear of being outed as a heretic online, in the workplace, or even among friends, for uttering a dissenting thought. This is why we at spiked are stepping up our fight for speech, expanding our output and remaking the case for this most foundational liberty. But to do that we need your help. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you want to support us, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can find out more and sign up here. Thank you! And keep speaking freely.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Share
Topics Politics

Comments

Jim Lawrie

5th November 2019 at 11:59 am

All the problem gamblers I know started in childhood playing cards for money with their friends and feeding fruit machines. They inevitably cheat and are dishonest. You’ll see them playing the puggies in fast food outlets everywhere.

Talking about majority this and that is ducking the issue of the minority who develop serious problems.

The gist of the article is that well brought up middle class children are unaffected, so haul up the ladder Jack. Shameful, but helpful – to the gambling trade. The official sanctioning of childhood behaviour that has the potential to ruin a life is wrong. As are it lackeys in the press and media. Our duty is to protect children. All of them.

Geoff Cox

5th November 2019 at 10:01 am

For some, the answer to *every* question is more regulations. This has been the downfall of society since, I’ll say, 1960. Every week, every month, there are minority interest groups campaigning for some action in their favour. What this amounts to is benefit to the few and cost to the many. Whilst from time to time we might be in the minority, for most of the time, statistically, we are not. Hence unless the benefit to the minority is so great it outweighs the cost to the majority, we, as a society, will be net losers.

Stephen J

5th November 2019 at 7:38 am

It is in precisely this sort of discussion that citizen invoked binding direct democracy becomes a really useful revealing tool.

The point about the concept is that before there is a vote, there is a public petition organised by proponents of the given idea. If they in particular cannot reach an agreed referendum trigger by receiving enough signatures.

It wouldn’t matter how much Tom Watson ranted on then, we would have the proof of just how urgent a particular issue is perceived to be.

Ven Oods

5th November 2019 at 9:18 am

Tom Watson used to be a fat idiot; then he shed some fat. Same problem, different silhouette.

Jerry Owen

5th November 2019 at 7:38 am

According to the left we have increasing child poverty.. yet we have increased child gambling, I see a contradiction with that one.

Ven Oods

5th November 2019 at 9:20 am

Could be that it’s the gambling losses that are making them poor?

Jerry Owen

5th November 2019 at 12:31 pm

No! You have to have money in the first place to gamble, and if the left want to harp on about children gambling they have to admit the kids have money in the first place.

Jim Lawrie

5th November 2019 at 9:24 pm

Child poverty is measured by parental income, not how it is spent.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.