America’s dysfunctional democracy

On guns, as on so many other issues, politicians are completely out of step with the public.

Wendy Kaminer
columnist

Share
Topics Politics USA

Apart from a more or less common language, the US and UK share a distressing trend – the decline of democracy and justifiable popular frustration with politics. You don’t need a think-tank to tell you as much, but it’s worth noting that a 2018 survey by the Pew Research Center found similar rates of dissatisfaction with democracy in both countries: 58 per cent of American respondents and 55 per cent of respondents in Britain had ‘decidedly negative views’ about the health of their democracies. These percentages seem remarkably low considering parliament’s voter-defiant paralysis over Brexit and the lawlessness, chaos and corruption of the Trump Show. But the Pew survey is over a year old; rates of dissatisfaction, if not disgust, should be higher in both countries today, although in the US a lot of people are simply worn out by daily outrages.

But fear and fury, more than weariness, mark the predominant public response to the horrifyingly predictable series of mass shootings and the failure of politicians to enact what many agree are reasonable gun regulations. An unusually strong majority of Americans (89 per cent) support expanded background checks for public and private gun sales; 86 per cent support ‘red flag’ laws allowing seizures of guns from people found by a court to be dangerous. The Democratic-controlled House has passed a strong background-check bill, but Republican Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell has refused to allow a Senate vote on it. He’s waiting for permission from the president, who’s waiting for permission from the NRA and, perhaps, his pollsters, or his id.

The irrelevance of public opinion to public officials is surely one sign of democracy’s decline. But even in our dysfunctional system, the unusually strong bipartisan consensus in favour of regulating gun ownership (at a time of extreme polarisation), may yet produce some legislative results: around eight in 10 Republicans and gun-owning households support background checks. Red-flag laws enjoy bipartisan support in the Senate, as Republican senator Marco Rubio argued in a New York Times op-ed. Corporate America is also beginning to speak out in favour of gun-safety regulations. The CEOs of 145 companies have sent a letter to the Senate calling for action on background checks; Walmart has asked customers not to carry guns in its stores. All things considered, Trump may okay some modest gun laws, and McConnell may allow the Senate to pass them. But gun-safety advocates should hesitate to allow hope to prevail over experience.

How do we account for the chasm between public opinion and political action on guns? For years it has reflected, in part, the political and financial power of the NRA, which is perhaps beginning to wane. But it’s also a testament to the anti-democratic nature of the US Senate, where conservative Republican, red-state voters enjoy greatly disproportionate representation. Wyoming, for example, with a population of about 600,000, elects two Senators, just like California – population of about 40million. The Senate enacts laws and appoints judges governing the entire country, but it often favours the opinions of a small segment of it (which is why federal courts are increasingly hostile to abortion rights). Passage of new gun regulations may depend on the support of conservative, rural gun owners, or at least their diminished opposition.

How stable is the bipartisan consensus on guns? Democrats calling for more controversial measures, like bans on sales of assault weapons and buy-back programmes, will find out. Opposition to what many might consider reasonable gun regulations has long been fuelled by fears that they represent initial steps in a punitive campaign to limit or even prohibit gun ownership. Presidential candidate Beto O’Rourke threatens to make those fears come true. Responding to a mass shooting in his hometown of El Paso, he has unequivocally called for the confiscation of assault weapons, to the applause of many in the Democratic base.

Absent another political earthquake, O’Rourke will not be the Democratic nominee, and, in any event, neither the president nor Congress has the constitutional power to confiscate guns. A ban on assault weapons could conceivably pass muster under the Second Amendment, but Fourth Amendment freedoms from unreasonable searches and seizures would and surely should bar law-enforcement officials from barging into private homes looking for weapons to confiscate. So, O’Rourke will not succeed in seizing assault weapons, but he could manage to lessen bipartisan support for new gun laws. The NRA should send him a thank-you note. Public opinion has to be exceptionally strong and united to prevail in our weak and divided democracy.

Wendy Kaminer is an author, a lawyer and a former national board member of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Picture by: Getty.

Get spiked in your inbox

The week
on spiked

Your weekly round-up
of spiked opinion, 
every Friday

Long-reads
from spiked

Essays, profiles and
in-depth features, every Sunday

Help spiked prick the Covid consensus

So here we are – 14 weeks into Britain’s three-week lockdown. We hope you are all staying sane out there, and that spiked has been of some assistance in that. We have ramped up our output of late, to provide a challenge to the Covid consensus. But we couldn’t have done that without your support. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is completely free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you enjoy our work, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can donate here.Thank you! And stay well.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Comments

Neil John

22nd September 2019 at 8:58 am

Interestingly the woman grabbing PM of Canada is so desperate to get reelected he’s promised a major gun grab if reelected. The globalists won’t ever stop trying to disarm the plebs and city dwellers with police an call minutes away don’t understand that rural living means when seconds count help is hours if not days away.

Chloe Tzang

21st September 2019 at 2:39 am

Two words. Second Amendment. Two more. Molon Labe.

And a few more. It’s there to protect is against fascists like Wendy Kaminer. And Wendy, do read up on the Constitution. Each State has two Senators, and two Senators only, for the very reason you criticize. It prevents States with larger populations dominating the US political system. If you want Constitutional changes (hint – like changes to, you know, that pesky 2nd Amendment that’s there to, you know, let us overthrow tyrannical governments by violence, you know, like that American Revolution thing), you need to persuade those people in other States. You know, the smaller ones. With the people you don’t like because they believe in the Constitution, limiting Government and following the law. And the right to bear arms (hint: NOT for hunting).

Why would you want to take away our guns? So we can emulate Venezuela or Hong Kong, where the people are powerless against their tyrannical rulers.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.