Owen Jones vs democracy

The Guardian columnist’s turn against ‘Lexit’ reveals his fear of radical change.

Philip Cunliffe

Share
Topics Brexit Politics UK

In a recent Medium post, Guardian columnist Owen Jones explains his decision to campaign against Brexit. He has decided that ‘Lexit’ – that is, a ‘left-wing exit’ from the EU – is impossible. For this reason, he argues that Brexit has to be opposed and the referendum result has to be overturned.

Although Jones actually coined the term ‘Lexit’ back in 2015 following the EU’s ruination of Greece, he also abandoned it in fairly short order. He is now admonishing the diminishing band of left Brexiters, who he thinks should ‘stop trying to make Lexit happen’. But in his turn against Brexit, all that Jones really reveals is how much of his politics is empty rhetoric and bluster. His arguments also show just how far the left has internalised its defeats over the past 40 years and how it accepts these defeats as inherent limits on its capacity to make change.

Jones claims it was his initial fear that Brexit would be captured by the right that prompted him to float the idea of Lexit. But once Brexit became, in his view, defined by nationalism and xenophobia, he could no longer sustain the Lexit position. This characterisation of the Leave vote is entirely at odds with the polling evidence, which shows that British attitudes to immigration are largely positive. It also indicates a remarkably self-defeating view of politics. The very thing that Jones feared and was trying to avoid – a Brexit defined by the right – has been encouraged by the left’s own unwillingness to fight to define the terms of Brexit. He is now encouraging other leftists to repeat his mistake.

In truth, Brexit never needed any riders or qualifications to begin with, ‘left’ or otherwise. Brexit was a popular insurrection at the ballot box. Its defining slogan – ‘take back control’ – resonates with the most basic and instinctive positions of classical left-wing politics: support for popular sovereignty and mass democracy. Aside from the decision itself to leave, which was the only question on the ballot paper, the ultimate outcome of what post-Brexit Britain should look like was always left open. Brexit remains a process to be defined. This, indeed, is the point of mass democracy – that it is an open-ended process whose outcome cannot be guaranteed in advance.

Jones charges Lexiters with failing to specify how their vision of a left-wing Brexit will be secured. What he is really demanding are certain conditions under which he will accept a democratic outcome as legitimate. This is why he can so easily reconcile himself to the anti-democratic EU. Jones dislikes what he calls the EU’s ‘market ideology’. He even regretfully notes that the EU will be unlikely to allow a future Labour government to carry out some of its key policies, such as state aid for industry. But it is precisely such restrictions on democratic outcomes that provide the assurances that Jones wants – democracy, but not too much of it.

What Jones ultimately reveals in his criticisms of Lexit is a fear of change and his unwillingness to fight for it. Jones has always cast his politics as being driven by radical change against vested interests. Yet in his repudiation of the very term that he coined, Jones is clearly signalling to his supporters that he will not fight to shape the process of social and political change: all bold promises will be reneged upon, all difficult positions abandoned.

In repudiating Lexit, he is saying that he will never fight to set the terms of the debate.

Philip Cunliffe is one of the co-founders of the Full Brexit. Follow him on Twitter: @thephilippics.

Picture by: Getty.

Let’s cancel cancel culture

Free speech is under attack from all sides – from illiberal laws, from a stifling climate of conformity, and from a powerful, prevailing fear of being outed as a heretic online, in the workplace, or even among friends, for uttering a dissenting thought. This is why we at spiked are stepping up our fight for speech, expanding our output and remaking the case for this most foundational liberty. But to do that we need your help. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you want to support us, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can find out more and sign up here. Thank you! And keep speaking freely.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Comments

Jay Cee

7th August 2019 at 1:26 am

It is a stupid, lazy story.

His position is entirely consistent. He has always objected to a a bad Tory deal or damaging no deal. It looks likely the UK is heading for a no deal withdrawal. As such, it is not ridiculous to back any remaining measures to avoid these. Leaving with a deal is not an option at this time. Therefore, he is entitled to back remaining.

There are a lot of whiny people here.

Melissa Jackson

9th August 2019 at 12:29 pm

Owen Jones really is shying away from Brexit today because he and his mates don’t get the pull the levers of power. That’s basically what it comes down to. And that is why it’s a bit repulsive to see him change his mind. He doesn’t have principles, he wanted power for him on the basis of him being him.

His arguments for Remain are all the same as everyone else – Don’t rock the boat and won’t someone think of the GDP. From the Blairite establishment we can accept that. From someone who claims to want radical, nay revolutionary, change this is frankly disgusting.

Follow his own logic. If the radical left wing agenda were to be offered to the British people and they voted for it… Surely Owen would oppose it, due to the economic impact which would certainly be substantial.

You have to be consistent with these things. If you care more about the GDP than the lives of real people then you don’t get to claim to be a social agitator for the people.

James Knight

6th August 2019 at 5:54 pm

“Jones charges Lexiters with failing to specify how their vision of a left-wing Brexit will be secured.”

Duh! It would be secured by engagement with voters on left wing issues and winning elections. I guess that approach is beyond his ken.

More likely that is what he fears most about Brexit. All he reveals is the poverty of his own vision while clinging to the EU like a security blanket.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.