David Attenborough pulls a Widdecombe

He compared the crusade against plastic to the fight against slavery – and got away with it.


Topics Politics UK

Yesterday, broadcaster, national treasure and anti-plastic crusader David Attenborough was invited to give his views on the environment and climate change to parliament.

He likened the public’s increased concern about plastics in the sea to changes in public attitudes and morality towards slavery.

You read that right. He drew a kind of moral equivalence between concern about plastic and concern about slavery – that historic abomination whereby humans were traded as property and forced to labour until their deaths.

According to Attenborough, the public’s perception of plastic pollution has now ‘been transformed’, and most people think that ‘to chuck plastic into the ocean is an insult’.

Similarly, he argues, ‘There was a time in the 19th century when it was perfectly acceptable for civilised human beings to think that it was morally acceptable to actually own another human being as a slave… Somehow or other in the space of I suppose 20 or 30 years, the public perception of that totally transformed.’

The response to this has been strangely muted. Last week, Ann Widdecombe caused uproar when she compared Britain leaving the EU to other instances in history of ‘the oppressed turning on the oppressors’: ‘slaves against their owners, the peasantry against their feudal barons – colonies… against their empire’.

The BBC’s Emma Barnett accused Widdecombe of having ‘white privilege’ for being so flippant in her comparison. Labour MP Dr Rosena Allin-Khan labelled her speech ‘disgusting’. David Lammy said it ‘is impossible to explain how offensive and ahistorical it is’ to compare Brexit to overturning slavery.

So why the double standard? Why are Attenborough’s comments not considered ‘disgusting’, ‘offensive’ or demonstrative of ‘white privilege’? Either it is ahistorical and wrong to compare current events to the horrors of slavery, or it isn’t.

spiked needs your support

Defending liberty isn’t easy – especially in times of crisis, when freedom is so often traded away in search of security. But amid the coronavirus pandemic we at spiked have continued to speak up for our principles, calling for more scrutiny of the authoritarian measures being wielded over us and more debate on the best way forward. To continue to do that, we need your help. spiked is free and it always will be, because we want as many people to read us as possible. But to keep spiked free we rely on the generosity of our readers, particularly those who can give regularly. Even £5 per month can make a huge difference to us. We know it’s hard out there for many of you, now more than ever. But if you support what we do here and you can afford to contribute, to make sure we can continue to produce our free and fearless journalism for anyone who wants to read it, please do consider making a donation today.

Thank you! And stay safe.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.



18th July 2019 at 5:50 pm

There will be people who will defend what David Attenborough says, no matter how foolish, because they worship him as a cult-idol. Many environmentalists have been advocating against polluting Planet Earth for years, but they do not grab headlines.

David Attenborough seems to take his talking-points from venal pop-mediocrities who exploit shock-and-awe tactics in order to make the news. They will say the most outrageous things–and the uneducated cheer. He fancies himself as a “rock star”, which is sad. Worse yet, he ignores the Eugenics crowd (Big Oil and Big Bank Barons) who have hijacked the environmental movement in order to pursue their own agenda: grab land, minerals & oil, and water…and get rid of as many of the hoi polloi as possible.

Pity that Attenborough has allowed his ego to get the better of him. He was far better in the 1990s and earlier, when he focused on showing us the glories of the natural world; when he didn’t seem to fall for the vacuous celebs; and, when he was down to earth…on Planet Earth.

Allan Reford

13th July 2019 at 4:48 pm

Slavery isn’t a “historic” thing.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.