Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
survey

abc def ghi jkl mno pqrs tuv wxyz index
Survey home
First thoughts
Final thoughts
Survey responses
RSS feed
Michael Baum
Gustav Born
K Eric Drexler
Marcus du Sautoy
Harold Kroto
Paul Lauterbur
Leon Lederman
Bernard Lovell
Sophie Petit-Zeman
Ingo Potrykus
Jack Pridham
Simon Singh
Jack Steinberger
Nina Japundžić-Žigon
professor of pharmacology at the University of Belgrade


At the beginning, my interest in science was predefined by my birth, as I was born to and raised by two scientists – my mother was a biochemist, and my father was a histologist. Later on, I found pleasure in studying science at school. Science could meet my curiosity in life, and could help me to understand how the world is conceived and how it functions.

In adulthood I became attracted by medicine, which gives science an important, humanitarian dimension. When I faced the limits of present-day therapy, I picked up research in pharmacology as my final vocation, in order to try to contribute to the discovery of more efficient new treatment.

Despite many disappointments, I didn’t give up, as I found pleasure in creating scientific contributions even with very modest funding. Science has helped me develop a critical way of thinking, that I can use for teaching students present therapeutics and the directions of the development of new therapeutic strategies.