YouTube must stop policing the corona debate

Its censorship of Professor Karol Sikora is disgraceful.

spiked

Big Tech censorship is out of control during this pandemic. Social-media platforms’ determination to censor supposed ‘misinformation’ has morphed into policing the debate about the pandemic itself. While many platforms have been guilty of this, YouTube is in a league of its own. Recently, it deleted a video of two medics discussing their own testing data and arguing that California’s lockdown should be lifted. Then it deleted an interview with Knut Wittkowski, an epidemiologist who is fiercely critical of lockdowns. Now it has taken down an interview that Professor Karol Sikora, a professor of medicine and former adviser to the World Health Organisation, gave to UnHerd.

That YouTube thinks it is its job to set the parameters of acceptable debate is bad enough. All voices should be heard. But what’s particularly concerning here is that Professor Sikora is hardly a huge dissenter. He supported the UK’s lockdown; he just thinks it should now be eased. And he is generally more optimistic about the pandemic burning itself out sooner rather than later. For this, he seems to have been put into the same category as conspiracy theorist David Icke (who has also had his interviews, about 5G and associated nonsense, removed by YouTube).

The platform clearly isn’t just tackling ‘misinformation’ — it is now censoring anything that doesn’t conform to the most extreme, pessimistic, pro-lockdown line. This corporate censorship must be opposed.

What we could do with your £5 per month

For less than the cost of two copies of the Guardian, you can help spiked become bigger and better and bolshier than ever. All of our articles and podcasts and essays are free, and we want to keep it that way. But to do so we ask our wonderful readers, if they can afford it, to chip in – ideally with a monthly donation. It might not sound like much, but donating as little as £5 per month has a transformative impact on our work. Knowing that we have your regular support means we can keep going and growing. So if you like our work and want to support us, please do consider signing up.

Thank you!

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Comments

Kimberly KJ

24th May 2020 at 3:11 am

Wаnna саsuаl sex?
Му pussy is at уouг dispоsаl!
Find mу prоfilе with phone numbеr hеге –> http://kisstok.com

James Knight

21st May 2020 at 7:08 pm

Not only big tech. Apparently the Guardian didn’t want to publish a letter from David Hockney which pointed to the negative correlation between smoking and covid19 infection rates because it could be seen to be “spreading disinformation”.

Hilarious considering “spreading disinformation” seems to be stock in trade for the Guardian. Remember the gem from 2004 when the Guardian was reporting seriously the secret Pentagon reports on the impact of climate change. The “suppressed” report was predicting rioting, nuclear war, the UK to be like Siberia less than 20 years. The only thing missing was the 4 horsemen.

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2004/feb/22/usnews.theobserver

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.