Little Europeans

The pro-EU movement isn’t internationalist – it’s painfully Eurocentric.

Rakib Ehsan


One of the most enduring myths of recent years is that the pro-Remain, pro-EU movement is the home of tolerance, open-mindedness and intellectualism. The reality is that notable elements within it are aggressively anti-democratic and spectacularly uninformed. There is also a dark ‘Fortress Europe’ underbelly to the Remainer movement, which scoffs at the thought of the UK rebalancing its global interests by strengthening political ties with developing Asian and African members of the Commonwealth.

The Remain campaign, supposedly outward-looking and internationalist, supported EU free-movement arrangements that created a two-tier British immigration system, in which predominantly white European migrants were the beneficiaries of preferential treatment. Meanwhile, non-white Brexiteers have been subjected to racially motivated Remain slurs for ‘stepping out of line’ on issues such as immigration and border security. Indeed, some Remainers have even dubiously cited non-EU migration as a factor in the Leave result being delivered back in June 2016.

More recently, in an insulting act of historical revisionism, the worst elements of the pro-EU brigade sought to reframe the defeat of Nazism in the Second World War as a ‘collective European effort’. In doing so, they completely disregarded the contribution that Americans, South Asians, Caribbeans, Africans, Brazilians, Canadians, Australians and New Zealanders made to that fight. By the end of the Second World War, the British Indian Army had become the largest volunteer army in history. The King’s African Rifles (KAR) was involved in military campaigns against Italian forces in East Africa, Japanese forces in Burma, and the Vichy French in the 1942 Battle of Madagascar. At the D-Day beach landings, American and Canadian forces joined their British counterparts in the Allied invasion of Normandy under Operation Overlord. Australia supported efforts against German and Italian aggression as part of the British Commonwealth and Empire, as well as fighting alongside the UK and US against Imperial Japan in the Asia-Pacific region. New Zealand was involved in various theatres of war, too, including the Mediterranean, North Africa and the Pacific. And it remains a little-known fact that Brazil sent an expeditionary force to support the Allied Forces’ Italian Campaign.

One of the most moving images I came across on the recent VE Day anniversary was of two elderly gentlemen, Alford Gardner and Lionel Roper. As young men, both travelled from Jamaica to join the Royal Air Force (RAF) during the Second World War. It is war heroes like these, born and raised in the Caribbean, who are, in effect, whitewashed by the #FBPE set’s Eurocentric views of the war.

The argument made by some Remainers, that VE Day should be celebrated in the UK as a ‘European Day’ of continental solidarity, obscures the contributions of non-European servicepeople to the broader Allied effort to defeat Nazism. It also conveniently ignores the reality that two of the main aggressors defeated in the war – Germany and Italy – are two of the larger EU member states by population. During the war, another major member of the EU, Spain, gave the go-ahead for the creation of the Blue Division – a Spanish volunteer unit that assisted Nazi German efforts on the Eastern Front. Belgium – the home of the EU’s Brussels bureaucratic machinery – originally espoused an official policy of neutrality.

Leading Remainers routinely caricature Brexit voters as Little Englanders, driven by fact-free, irrational jingoistic impulses. But this is precisely what many Little Europeans on their own side are guilty of.

Dr Rakib Ehsan is a research fellow at the Henry Jackson Society. Follow him on Twitter: @rakibehsan.

Picture by: Getty.

spiked needs your support

Defending liberty isn’t easy – especially in times of crisis, when freedom is so often traded away in search of security. But amid the coronavirus pandemic we at spiked have continued to speak up for our principles, calling for more scrutiny of the authoritarian measures being wielded over us and more debate on the best way forward. To continue to do that, we need your help. spiked is free and it always will be, because we want as many people to read us as possible. But to keep spiked free we rely on the generosity of our readers, particularly those who can give regularly. Even £5 per month can make a huge difference to us. We know it’s hard out there for many of you, now more than ever. But if you support what we do here and you can afford to contribute, to make sure we can continue to produce our free and fearless journalism for anyone who wants to read it, please do consider making a donation today.

Thank you! And stay safe.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Kimberly KJ

24th May 2020 at 3:02 am

Hаve уоu ever tгied сybеrsеx?
Let’s give еaсh оthег plеasure tоnight!

Gary Coop

18th May 2020 at 4:51 pm

‘Spectacularly uniformed”

Hold on … pointing out that some British voters in 2016 were uniformed is taboo on this website. You’re only allowed to claim British voters knew exactly what they were voting for and why.

Now, back in the real world, my remain vote in 2016 came from a position of mostly ignorance about, say, just in time delivery systems, car plants, cross border insurance policies, immigration and trawler fishing rights. I’m no expert.

This ignorance, however, was not unique to me and was shared by every single Brexit voter in my family/wider circle WITHOUT EXCEPTION.

I voted remain, with massive holes in my knowledge base. As did millions of other British adults.

As a remain voter I merely laugh and roll my eyes at any pathetic Brexit voters who make out that in June 2016 they knew everything there was to know. We know that such self confidence is delusional in most cases and would wither away if subjected to proper A Level style testing in village halls across the 4 nations.

We san browse any right wing newspaper website to see huge numbers of Brexit voters understand very little.

One thing I can claim to have got 100% right – in the run up to referendum I wasn’t on Facebook sharing moronic memes about the EU wanting to ban us drinking tea. A lot of brexit supporters acted like morons in the run up to the election and to this day still refuse to explain why or even admit it.

You won’t find me on Facebook claiming that May is a traitor, either. Brexiters again. Thick as mince, lots if them.

2016 then – MILLIONS of us were bloody ill informed. I just laugh at brexiters who incorrectly claim otherwise.

Binary vote on complex subject in which, for example, a 55 year old working class woman in South London had no way of really knowing what long term impact her vote (either way) would have on a Welsh tech sector miles away. She didn’t have 25 years of study time to do the analysis/run tests.

Vivian Darkbloom

18th May 2020 at 11:33 pm

Gary: If you wanted the vote to go toward your favoured position then you have to get an awful lot of voters on your side; many more than the other clowns. That’s simply the way our political system works. You will never get these voters to support your cause when you employ such contumely as “ignorance”, “pathetic” “delusional” “morons” “thick as mince” unless they’re self-hating masochists. It’s not deep. It’s not complicated. It’s like saying “vote for me you thick racist peasant scum” and then being surprised when they vote against you.

As Sam Beckett said, “Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again.”

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.