The corona cops are out of control

The heavy-handed enforcement of non-existent laws needs to stop.

Luke Gittos

Topics Politics UK

Northamptonshire Police, Nick Adderley, addressed a press conference last week sounding more like a military general than the chief of a regional police force.

Adderly said that his officers had given the public a ‘three-week grace’ period to ‘understand what is being asked of them [during the lockdown] and why’. He announced that this grace period was over and that officers would now be enforcing the law vigorously, using fixed-penalty notices and arrests. He said the police could resort to roadblocks to prevent unnecessary journeys and – if people ‘do not heed the warnings’ – could also start searching shopping trolleys to make sure that supermarket customers are not buying unnecessary items.

Adderly later used Twitter to row back on the threat of searching trolleys, claiming that he was merely making a point about the ‘necessity of individual journeys’. It might be easy to dismiss Adderley as one senior officer going slightly over the top. But his intervention was part of a wider trend.

There is no evidence whatsoever that large numbers of people are ignoring the lockdown. Adderley himself accepted that the ‘vast majority’ of the public were complying and that his force was merely looking to ‘hone in on’ persistent rulebreakers. But given the extraordinary levels of public compliance with the lockdown, this begs the question: why was Adderley’s press conference necessary at all? Why do the police feel compelled to lecture us about these restrictions? Adderley said part of the police’s role is to ‘educate the public’ about the seriousness of coronavirus. Since when?

Examples of over-policing continue to stack up. On Good Friday, Cambridgeshire Police tweeted that officers were pleased to find no shoppers in the ‘non-essential’ aisles at Tesco. On the same day, South Yorkshire Police were forced to apologise after an officer in Rotherham was filmed telling a family they were not allowed in their own front garden. Another video shared online showed officers breaking down a man’s door because they had heard reports of a gathering. The man was watching television alone.

One of the clear problems is that officers are focusing on whether people’s actions are ‘essential’, rather than making a commonsense judgment about whether people are causing harm. When police officers are encouraged to pass judgment on other people’s ideas of what constitutes an ‘essential’ journey, or an essential activity, or even an essential piece of shopping, it is not surprising that bizarre examples of overzealous policing keep emerging.

There is also an apparent ignorance of the law among the police. There is no explicit power under the Coronavirus Act 2020 to enter someone’s home. Clearly, breaking a man’s door down is a disproportionate response to a report of a gathering. Nor is there any law against buying or selling non-essential items.

We are seeing worrying signs of the police moving beyond the law to enforce their own idea of what the lockdown should look like. This was abundantly clear in the first publicised prosecution under the Coronavirus Act, in the course of which the police demanded that the suspect explain why she was out of her home. Again, there is no power for this in the law.

This heavy-handed policing will be counterproductive. Any long-term strategy against the virus will have to include a significant element of public trust. It would make more sense for the police and the government to trust people to make the right decisions in the face of the available information, rather than seeking to police zealously those who appear to break the rules. It is not the job of the police to monitor and maintain public health. We need to be trusted to do this ourselves, with the law intervening only when absolutely necessary.

In a democracy, policing is only achievable by consent. People have to believe that the police are acting in their best interests. That means police officers need to make commonsense judgments about what constitutes criminal behaviour and what does not. Over-policing is not effective policing. The police need to start backing off.

Luke Gittos is a spiked columnist and author. His latest book Human Rights – Illusory Freedom: Why We Should Repeal the Human Rights Act, is published by Zero Books. Order it here.

Picture by: Getty.

Let’s cancel cancel culture

Free speech is under attack from all sides – from illiberal laws, from a stifling climate of conformity, and from a powerful, prevailing fear of being outed as a heretic online, in the workplace, or even among friends, for uttering a dissenting thought. This is why we at spiked are stepping up our fight for speech, expanding our output and remaking the case for this most foundational liberty. But to do that we need your help. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you want to support us, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can find out more and sign up here. Thank you! And keep speaking freely.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Gerry Mohan

17th April 2020 at 12:31 am

Confirming Stanley Milgram’s ‘Obedience to Authority’ experiment…how many potential concentration camp guards in Britain’s quaint suburbs are just waiting to be let out?

Ronda Roman

14th April 2020 at 10:57 pm

Thousand Of the Peoples are Died From Corona Virus…On The Other Hand Thousand Peoples Are Died By Poorness Its Means Poorness is More Dangerous As Compare to Corona Virus……Help Poors

Suresh Syed

14th April 2020 at 9:36 pm

Fortunately PC Plod has kept a low profile here in NZ. Yes they have stopped people driving a 100K to a supermarket or going to their holiday baches over Easter and also set up a snitch line – dial 105. But they have been careful to follow a common sense approach in spite of pressure from ex Commissioner Mike Bush to take a hard line stance.

Aunty Podes

19th April 2020 at 11:59 am

Where do you live, mate? Here in Auckland the fuzz are destroying their reputation by jumping all over people.
“Where d’yer think you’re off to – that’s not essential – too far – gpt striaght jone again. If I see you out here again you are forrit!”
“No – you can’t swim, or fish, or fly your kite, or check on your boat.”
What’s more Commissar Ardern encourages us to “Dob-in a neighbour!”
Last one said that was Hitler and his Nazis!.

Matt Ryan

14th April 2020 at 7:54 pm

Why are people surprised? Plod was useless before the lockdown and is useless now. Nothing has changed apart from they can leave the cop shop now as the violent criminals aren’t on the street as much.

david rawson

14th April 2020 at 7:25 pm

The average plod is a bit di., probably bullied at school, not tough enough for military & obsessed with their fat pension.

In my experience of modern coppers.

Shillitto they ain’t

Jeremiah Johndon

14th April 2020 at 6:46 pm

Really, since when did it matter to the cops what people bought at Tescos?

Vadar’s Hate Child

15th April 2020 at 12:05 am

It doesn’t and guidance issued recently by the National PolIce Chiefs Council makes it clear that it is legitimate to buy anything stocked in a shop that is legally open. It also states there is no test of essentialness in the Regulations, all that is required is a reasonable excuse to be out of your home.


14th April 2020 at 6:01 pm

‘This heavy-handed policing will be counterproductive.’ Sadly, you are probably wrong about that. As far as this observer can judge there is widespread public enthusiasm for enforcement of the ‘lockdown’. A few over-zealous bobbies aren’t going to upset people nearly as much as the fear that somebody, somewhere, isn’t obeying ‘the rules’.

Geoff W

15th April 2020 at 11:58 am

I disagree. It is definitely making me far less tolerant towards the police in general although so far as I am aware they aren’t behaving in this way in my immediate area.

Sooner rather than later this lockdown will have to eased before the economy collapses. That will mean the public being entrusted to follow the rules as they go about their daily business.

It will also mean a greater degree of risk for people outside but that is a risk that must be borne. Staying cocooned at home for ever or until a vaccine is developed simply isn’t an option for the majority.

The release of the economic forecasts is the government moving to change our mindset to one which will accept a higher degree of risk as we move towards a resumption of normal activity.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.

Deplorables — a spiked film