The frightening crackdown on Covid ‘fake news’
We cannot let free speech be a casualty of coronavirus.
Culture secretary Oliver Dowden said government action was necessary to ‘stem the spread of falsehoods and rumours, which could cost lives’.
?Inaccurate online posts could cost lives: be a sceptic
(no paywall to view)https://t.co/uimjZiyD3F
— Oliver Dowden #StayHomeSaveLives (@OliverDowden) March 30, 2020
Conservative MP Damian Collins, former head of the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport select committee, has gone further, calling for anyone knowingly sharing misinformation to be charged with a criminal offence. ‘The information contagion around Covid-19 is so dangerous’, he said. ‘It is very easy for false rumours to take hold and spread.’
The government’s fake-news crackdown conflates (already criminal) phishing scams – which trick people into giving up sensitive personal data – and the spreading of unsubstantiated claims, especially if they are made by people pretending to be coronavirus experts.
Most concerning is that this could lead to the censorship of those who disagree with the government’s line on coronavirus – and the extraordinary measures it has put in place to tackle it.
There is a great deal of disagreement among experts on a whole range of questions related to the coronavirus outbreak, such as over the death rate of the virus or the necessity of a society-wide shutdown. Members of the public have every right to weigh in on these debates on social media, too.
As spiked has consistently argued, a pandemic is no reason to sacrifice freedom of speech.
An emergency of this magnitude and the responses to it make free speech more important than ever. While it is right to adhere to the lockdown measures in place, such drastic curbs on our daily lives and on our liberties must be subject to constant and ruthless scrutiny.
In fact, the viral outbreak was made so much worse by the Chinese authorities’ aversion to free speech. In December last year, when Dr Li Weinliang began speaking out about a novel virus he had encountered while treating patients in Wuhan, police told him to ‘stop making false comments’ and investigated him for ‘spreading rumours’. He later died from Covid-19.
So while China persecuted those warning about the dangers of coronavirus for spreading fake news, the UK government could punish those who say the problem is exaggerated or who question the government’s advice.
The government and society at large should try to counter rumour, hearsay and misinformation with well-evidenced facts, rather than with censorship. That way we can preserve both public health and healthy debate.
Picture by: Getty.
spiked is free, and it always will be, which is why we need your help. We don’t have a paywall, or bonus content for paying customers, because we want our arguments for freedom and democracy, against misanthropy and identity politics, to reach as many people as possible. Which is why we ask those of our readers who can afford it to chip in. One-off donations are hugely appreciated, but monthly donations are even better. They allow us to plan for the future and to grow. Even £5 a month is a huge help. It’s much cheaper than your average magazine subscription, and it ensures that spiked is free and open to all. To make either a monthly or a one-off donation, click here. Thank you for your support.
To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.