The US is still at war with Iran

Three months on, and it's clear the killing of Soleimani has achieved nothing.

Tim Black

Tim Black

Topics Politics USA World

Three months ago, the US carried out a drone strike that killed General Qasem Soleimani, the architect of Iran’s regional military strategy. As a White House memo to Congress explained: ‘The purposes of this action were to protect US personnel, to deter Iran from conducting or supporting further attacks against US forces and interests, to degrade Iran’s and Quds Force-backed militias’ ability to conduct attacks, and to end Iran’s strategic escalation of attacks.’

If those were indeed the aims, we should judge Soleimani’s execution a failure. There has been no cessation of attacks against US forces in the region. And there has been no change to Iran’s military strategy, despite its architect’s demise.

Just last week, a barrage of rockets was launched at the Camp Taji airbase, which is just north of Baghdad and home to US and allied forces. Two US servicemen and one British soldier were killed, while 14 others were injured. No one claimed responsibility, but the US suspected the work of the Iran-backed Iraqi militia, Kataib Hezbollah. After all, it had quickly prasied the attack as a ‘precision jihadi operation’. So US forces in Iraq hit back, carrying out airstrikes against Kataib Hezbollah and other Iran-backed militia groups.

That predictably was followed by a retaliatory strike. Early this week, rockets hit the Besmaya training base south of Baghdad, where US-led coalition troops were present. Once again, no group has claimed responsibility, but the US has assigned it to Kataib Hezbollah.

It seems pretty clear that, far from de-escalating the conflict with Iran, and deterring Iran-supported attacks against the US and its allies, Soleimani’s killing has ramped up tensions. Iran-backed militias are continuing to mount quick, mainly rocket attacks on US military and political interests. And the US is continuing to respond, carrying out perfunctory air strikes on what are believed to be Iranian proxies operating in Iraq, and even, as of this Wednesday, increasing the sanctions the US has already imposed on Iran.

Soleimani’s killing wasn’t an end to, or, as some of Trump’s more excitable critics had it, a catastrophic turning point, in the conflict. And it certainly hasn’t brought Ayatollah Ali Khamenei to the negotiating table. It was merely adding yet more fuel to an existing fire. In fact, since late October, there have been 24 separate rocket attacks on the US embassy in Baghdad or bases where coalition troops are deployed. There has been no let-up since January and Soleimani’s death. Instead, there has been a continuation of the low-level, warlike trajectory on which US-Iran relations have seemingly been on since Donald Trump assumed the presidency, set about dismantling Barack Obama’s 2015 nuclear deal, and ramped up an impoverishing sanctions regime.

Some have pointed out just how absurd it is that this tit-for-tat escalation is happening as the Covid-19 crisis continues to worsen throughout the world. Especially so given Iran is arguably the worst-hit nation by Covid-19 outside of China – as of Tuesday this week, there were 16,000 infections and 988 deaths, including at least 12 Iranian politicians and officials, both sitting and former. Many believe the infection rate and death toll is far higher in reality. This is a perilous situation that has been made worse by America’s decades-old attempt to economically quarantine Iran, through sanctions.

But the fact that this conflict is continuing in the midst of the Covid-19 crisis tells us just how entrenched the antagonism now is, and just how irresistable is its momentum for political and military elites in both US and Iran.

What is most striking about this conflict, however, is not that it is continuing in spite of a deadly global flu pandemic. It is that it is being fought at a distance, in Iraq. It was there, of course, that the US assassinated Soleimani. And it is there that US forces are engaged in battles with Iran-backed militias. And this is what makes it so dangerous. For those Iran-backed militias, such as Kataib Hezbollah, currently launching rockets at US-led coalition forces, are entwined with the Iraqi state itself. This is because, during the conflict with ISIS, the Iraqi state relied on these militias as an effective frontline against ISIS, so much so, in fact, that they were collectively rebranded as the Popular Mobilisation Forces by the Iraqi government.

This means that the US is not simply fighting Iranian proxies in Iraq. It is also fighting elements connected to the Iraqi state. It therefore risks dragging the Iraqi state itself into a conflict with the US. After all, such is the post-ISIS reliance of the Iraqi state on Ira that in January, the Iraqi parliament passed a non-binding resolution calling for foreign troops to leave.

If anything, that is exactly what the US and its allies should do. Leave Iraq. Not to leave it to Iran, but to leave it to the Iraqi people. Because what tends to be forgotten as the rockets fly into army bases, and the US planes empty their munitions on militia camps, is that many Iraqis, both Sunni and Shia, have been openly protesting against Iran’s influence on the Iraqi body politic since last autumn. And they have been doing so at great personal cost, with reports now emerging that Iraqi security forces have been using military-grade tear-gas grenades to disperse them, killing and maiming many, and arresting and detaining many more.

The Iranian regime’s influence in the region, and in Iraq in particular, is nothing to be cheered. But the US’s sabre-rattling is not helping. It is forcing Iran and its proxy militias to bed in. And, above all, it is undermining the efforts of people, like the Iraqi protesters, to take control of their own affairs.

Tim Black is a spiked columnist.

Picture by: Getty.

spiked needs your support

Defending liberty isn’t easy – especially in times of crisis, when freedom is so often traded away in search of security. But amid the coronavirus pandemic we at spiked have continued to speak up for our principles, calling for more scrutiny of the authoritarian measures being wielded over us and more debate on the best way forward. To continue to do that, we need your help. spiked is free and it always will be, because we want as many people to read us as possible. But to keep spiked free we rely on the generosity of our readers, particularly those who can give regularly. Even £5 per month can make a huge difference to us. We know it’s hard out there for many of you, now more than ever. But if you support what we do here and you can afford to contribute, to make sure we can continue to produce our free and fearless journalism for anyone who wants to read it, please do consider making a donation today.

Thank you! And stay safe.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Jeremiah Johndon

24th March 2020 at 4:06 pm

As much as I got a kneejerk good feeling after the US wasted that general, I knew it wasn’t going to make things better

Geoff W

20th March 2020 at 9:17 pm

As Melanie Phillips said, we are the target of an Islamic holy war and till we start fighting that war and the ideology behind it we will never win! The “not going on like this” applies as much to the undeclared war with Iran as jihad attacks on European streets.

“Moreover, anyone who points out that Islamic terrorism is part of a holy war being waged against both the west and the not-Islamic-enough Muslim world is denounced for “Islamophobia”.

This also undermines those courageous Muslims pressing for a reform of their religion, often at risk to their lives, who have the ground cut from under their feet by westerners maintaining that the problem doesn’t lie within the Islamic world but with “Islamophobes” who claim that it does. [See also Islamic scholar Yahya Cholil Staquf]

If we really are not to “go on like this”, the first thing that needs to happen is that this dishonesty must end and the truth must publicly be told.

The government should start saying what it has flinched from saying: that the west is the target of Islamic holy war. It should say that, although many British Muslims pose no threat to anyone, too many in the community either believe the extremist precepts on which the jihad is based or passively go along with them; that too many groups and individuals revere, for example, Sheikh Yusuf Qaradawi who has endorsed human bomb attacks; that even among those Muslims who oppose violence, too many endorse poisonous ideas about the non-Muslim world which create the sea in which extremism and terrorism swim.

It should state bluntly that Muslims must start to take responsibility, both at home and abroad, for this war being waged in the name of their religion – and that the government will take all necessary measures to defeat it.”

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.