People need better working conditions, not yoga

The wellbeing fad is great for bosses and terrible for workers.

Neil Davenport

Share
Topics Politics UK

The Labour Party wants all government policy decisions to be gauged against people’s future health and wellbeing. The proposed Future Generations Wellbeing Act for England would, among other things, introduce a ‘health equality audit’ of government decisions.

What this might mean in practice is unclear. Among other elements, parts of the proposed act would link health measures to ‘environmental and climate emergency goals’. But Labour is also clearly capitalising on the increasing use of the concept of ‘wellbeing’ to assess policies and practices, a fad that is rife across public institutions and business.

The way wellbeing is playing out in public-sector and, increasingly, private-sector workplaces is striking. It has morphed into a set of practices that management and even trade unions have started to embrace.

Wellbeing policies at work are essentially management initiatives designed to improve staff’s mental health, stress levels and comfort. This can range from the availability of ‘de-stressing spaces’ in the workplace to free yoga classes, from mindfulness exercises to screen-break reminders.

Wellbeing looks primed to challenge working conditions as the focus of workplace organisation and concerns. This in itself is telling. Whereas demands for improved working conditions are about hours worked, the amount of breaks during the working day, and potential hazards in the production process, wellbeing policies focus on individual psychological and health matters.

And whereas it is workers and unions who fight for better working conditions, wellbeing policies are largely driven by management and the wider political establishment. (The new Ofsted criteria for inspecting schools, for example, stipulate that schools must take steps to boost the wellbeing of teachers.)

Websites offering consultancy on good wellbeing policies are quick to point out that they needn’t cost much to company or public-service budgets. The transparent aim is to increase the productivity of staff by ensuring that their wellbeing and mental health are looked after. A number of memes circulating from workplaces, about employers offering yoga in place of pay rises, reveal a healthy cynicism towards this approach.

As with ‘equal opportunity’ policies, wellbeing initiatives help burnish the authority of management, under the seemingly benign goal of ensuring ‘happiness’ among staff. There is potential here for snooping and monitoring the non-working lives of staff, too, as the ‘emotional’ and thus personal lives of workers become the concern of management and human-resources departments.

The wellbeing agenda, therefore, risks eroding the distinction between our working and personal lives. It can also lead to instances whereby our private opinions or views are deemed to be detrimental to the ‘wellbeing’ of staff in the public workplace (as was the case with an Asda worker sacked for posting a Billy Connolly joke on social media).

Far from being laughably soft and fluffy, then, the wellbeing agenda can be used as a pretext to discipline workers. When micromanaging the emotions of staff is a responsibility of management, those causing upset (even unintentionally) can face official warnings or even be dismissed.

What’s more, the emphasis on improving our psychological wellbeing can come at the expense of discussing salaries and pay rises. In a stagnant economy, with little innovation and dynamism and a great number of in-work poor, wellbeing policies promote the idea that our emotional health is more important than our material needs.

The wellbeing agenda is likely to contribute to, rather than simply compensate for, economic stagnation. It sets out to lower our horizons, asking us to focus on our inner selves rather than our living standards – to take time off because of ‘stress’ rather than work hard and demand a pay rise. (More work days are now lost due to absenteeism than strikes.)

Amid all the wellbeing jargon, we must remember that the most stressful situation an individual can face is not having enough money to get by on. It is an all-encompassing source of tension and dread that is difficult to brush aside. This is why unemployment is a far more stressful experience than mountains of tasks and deadlines at work.

So let’s forget aromatherapy and yoga classes. When it comes to providing personal contentment and security at work, it is still decent pay and conditions that matter most.

Neil Davenport is a writer based in London.

Picture by: Getty.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Comments

Puddy Cat

9th July 2019 at 9:04 am

It sounds like something that would appeal to a eugenicist! Another example of the old style paternalism where, under the guise of looking after you you might find your lives controlled. Take the old cradle to grave companies their company houses, company schools, whole cities given over. How could you in any way transgress against those endowing you and if you did where do you go? There is something here that smacks of the manorial system. Pretty soon you could see the emergence of local laws the emergence of coercion, to behave in the way that they want you to. We have seen the film system, where starlets had to behave in a particular way on pain of not getting parts (right down to whom it was that you married, absurd moral codes).

That people should vote for not having individual existences and not suffer the intrusion of systems into their lives is rather worrying. The idea of the ‘Keep’ in the castle that people could retire to in times of conflict, vassalage. To think that some vague assertion of puritanism could in any way lift your life. The most compelling argument against that was Dr Strangelove, where a character was so imprinted with thoughts of bodily purity that he ordered a nuclear war on the understanding that some were not pure.

The idea of mass involvement was a theme of National Socialism that Riefenstahl portrayed. So strange in a country of culture that well being was not portrayed as having an accomplishment, such as mastering a musical instrument, writing poetry or some other sensitivity but, rather, the expression of overall power as being seen in the building blocks of the perfection of the human body. Something attained not by any cerebral process and individually but by the subjugation of people into conformity.

So what use will we have for the imperfect? Perhaps a disinclination to exercise or to follow the mantra will make you an outsider. Already we see that general conversation among the young can centre on the gym and rather than having pride in ones body (a personal trait) you have to be beach ready or whatever the sticking plaster might be. The obverse side of things is young women are said to be put off sexual relations today maybe the rise of infection, perhaps the indelicacy of ones hulk of a partner may not help. Or, where once sensitivity was thought an admirable quality and led to people writing poems, adopting politeness and social graces to oil societies turbulent waters, the expression of one’s toned body only encourages self promotion, self assertion and no time in the day to read a book.

D. C. Morrow

9th July 2019 at 9:03 am

Such things are simply a distraction from the results of poor leadership and crass exploitation — distractions that make workers feel responsible for the flaws….

Jane 70

9th July 2019 at 6:52 am

Mindfulness instead of sick pay, holiday pay and a living wage.

A family member teaches yoga, and is a fully qualified practitioner.Undoubtedly yoga practice is beneficial for many, but it cannot be a substitute for decent working conditions.

Charles Stuart

9th July 2019 at 4:23 am

WHy is it that people can’t read history and see how massive government interference in life is always a mistake?

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.