Economic Freedom Fighters: South Africa’s answer to UKIP

Sharmini Brookes

Share
Topics Politics

On Thursday 21 August 2014, riot police in the South African parliament forcibly removed MPs from the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) from the house after they refused to obey the request of the speaker to sit down.

The shenanigans began when president and African National Congress (ANC) leader Jacob Zuma finished his prepared response to pre-set questions relating to the public protector’s report on misspent funds for his private residence, Nkandla. The EFF posed a follow-up question, asking if Zuma intended to pay back the money. They were interrupted by a ‘point of order’ from an ANC MP, who said the president had already responded to the public protector’s report and that further investigations would follow. The EFF countered by saying that the ANC was trying to avoid the question and continued to demand in chorus that Zuma ‘pay back the money’ owed to taxpayers. The speaker then ordered them to sit down and refused to allow the point of order they raised despite their numerous pleas. They continued their chanting until the speaker ordered the riot police to remove all of the EFF members.

Many South African citizens were shocked by the debacle. The EFF, known for its disruptive antics and anti-establishment rhetoric, is seen by citizens as something of a nuisance to parliamentary process. However, the EFF is really the only political party that is putting the ANC under pressure. Zuma and the ANC believe, somewhat smugly, that by saying nothing about the president’s expenses the issue will eventually disappear. This complacency is fuelled by the weakness of the main South African opposition party, the Democratic Alliance (DA). However, like the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in Britain, the EFF is starting to introduce some contention into South African politics, something which has clearly unsettled Zuma and his party.

The EFF itself, and its leader Julius Malema, are little more than opportunists. It has little political substance to offer. However, to some among the frustrated and sidelined masses of South Africa, the EFF’s willingness to stick two fingers up to establishment is refreshing. What’s more, the party’s protests have brought up legitimate questions about whether parliamentary protocol is stifling free speech and damaging South African democracy. Long may the EFF’s antics continue.

Sharmini Brookes is a writer based in Johannesburg.

spiked is free, and it always will be, which is why we need your help. We don’t have a paywall, or bonus content for paying customers, because we want our arguments for freedom and democracy, against misanthropy and identity politics, to reach as many people as possible. Which is why we ask those of our readers who can afford it to chip in. One-off donations are hugely appreciated, but monthly donations are even better. They allow us to plan for the future and to grow. Even £5 a month is a huge help. It’s much cheaper than your average magazine subscription, and it ensures that spiked is free and open to all. To make either a monthly or a one-off donation, click here. Thank you for your support.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Share
Topics Politics
Share