It’s now woke to like Louis Farrakhan

Why are so many celebrities praising a notorious anti-Semite?

Nick Dixon

Share
Topics Politics USA

‘Peak woke’ is a phrase we hear a lot these days. It means the belief that we have reached a point of ideologically driven stupidity so great that we simply cannot go any higher.

But invariably we find that what we assumed to be the peak was a mere foothill, as another brave pioneer once again tries to scale the terrifying summit of Woke Mountain.

The latest of these expeditions involves the burgeoning gang of celebrities who have taken to praising Louis Farrakhan.

Yes, it is now woke to be into Louis Farrakhan. If 2020 was a sentence, that would be it.

Farrakhan is an American minister and activist known for his work within the black community, as well as for calling Jewish people ‘termites’, and believing that white people are an evil race created by a scientist named Yakub in a eugenics experiment.

Pretty standard, really.

A gifted speaker, he has managed to remain in the public eye for decades. He is the Bono of Black Power, the will.i.am of the Nation of Islam, the Madonna of thinking white people were made by a mad scientist who lived in a cave.

All right, that last one doesn’t work.

Farrakhan popped up once again recently when popular rapper and actor Ice Cube began effusively praising him on Twitter.

Some were disappointed in Cube, others didn’t seem to mind. And I must say as a free-speech absolutist, I find there is something refreshing about someone just being open about their beliefs, however mad and hateful said beliefs may appear.

At least that person is being honest, so we can see what they’re about. Better out than in, type of thing. Ice Cube seems to reckon black people are the best ones of all the people and he doesn’t care who knows it.

He is also presumably okay with anti-Semitism and hating white people, though I can’t confirm this and I should state that my own strong beliefs involve not getting sued (again).

At least Cube’s position makes some sense from his perspective. He wants what’s best for what he sees as his people, and is apparently not that arsed about certain other races.

Plus, he’s always been political, and kind of angry about stuff. He’s done the research, even if he’s been going to the wrong libraries.

Where it got really weird was this last week, when all manner of incredibly unlikely celebrities started jumping on the Farrakhan fun train.

Aggressively clueless internet personality Jameela Jamil (sorry, I mean aggressively clueless ‘actress, presenter, model, writer and activist’ Jameela Jamil) managed to open up her own Instagram and post a video of Farrakhan with the caption:

‘Someone please tell me the name of this extraordinary man who so perfectly sums up white fear in under a minute.’

The caption was, being generous, batshit bonkers.

It sounded like Downton Abbey with a sprinkling of Downfall. ‘Darling, who is that dashing fellow who believes white people are subhuman and Jews are insects? I simply must make his acquaintance.’

But let’s be fair, she didn’t know anything about Farrakhan. She just dug his hip take on ‘white fear’.

Well, call me a totally cucked incel, Jameela, but one could be forgiven for having some fear of a charismatic, influential leader who thinks your whole race is pure vermin. That kind of thing has gone wrong before.

However, as a comedian I do appreciate that he kept his set tight. One minute is pretty punchy when you’re condemning an entire people.

Well. Then things got really wild.

Sassy comedian — sorry, sassy ‘actress, writer, television host, producer and activist’ (gotta have the activist in there) — Chelsea Handler also posted the Farrakhan video straight to ‘the gram’ with the caption ‘I learned a lot from watching this powerful video’.

What — one might reasonably ask — the f*** is going on?

How did Farrakhan suddenly become so Farra-kool??

And why does the caption sound like she’s reading it out during an interrogation? ‘I learned a lot from watching this powerful video and I now see Mr Farrakhan is the truth and the way. All hail this dashing fellow who distills white fear in seconds.’

Handler then doubled down in the comments. When asked if she would ever share a video of Hitler, she replied:

‘no, because Hitler was responsible for killing millions of lives [sic]. Farrakhan is just responsible for his own promotion of anti Semitic beliefs. They are very different.’

It is true. Killing millions of lives is one of the worst things you can do.

But apparently anti-Semitism in general is cool with Chelsea, as long as you don’t get all genocidey about it.

You’ve got to hand it to Handler: defending anti-Semitism is a gutsy move. Especially when your grandfather was, like Chelsea’s, an actual Nazi. Not the kind that she likes to call other people, but one of the proper ones, with the uniform and everything.

Or at least, he fought in the war for the Germans. According to an article I read, that doesn’t necessarily make him a Nazi, but I’m too spun out on white fear to be able to tell the difference.

Wait, though, it gets even more insane.

Incredibly for someone supporting Farrakhan, Chelsea Handler has one Jewish parent and one white parent.

If white people really were created in a sick breeding programme, as Farrakhan claims, she would be the apotheosis of his theory. An unholy combination of the two races he despises, who has somehow developed self-awareness and become so convinced of her own wretchedness that she ironically looks to her greatest enemy to explain why she is evil.

Projected self-loathing is clearly one possible reason why people like Handler behave like this. Another guess would be virtue-signalling careerism. But I’m not sure. From what I’ve seen, a lot of it seems to be genuine, if grossly misguided, conviction.

After all, if you’re going to scale the Mountain of Woke, you’re going to need all the get up and go you can muster.

What’s extra troubling to me — the topping on this massive slice of trouble cake — is that every denouncement of the Farrakhan fan girls (oh, did I mention Jennifer Aniston, Michelle Pfeiffer and Jennifer Garner also liked Handler’s Instagram post? You go girls) mentions Farrakhan’s anti-Semitism, but no one, not a single digital soul I can find on Twitter, points out his ultra-racist, anti-white eugenics theories.

A couple of accounts cited his alleged misogyny and homophobia, but nothing on the white thing.

White people are apparently now so hated that it’s just a given that you won’t get any traction at all suggesting they are anything other than the actual scum of the earth.

‘What? White people are inherently evil subhumans created by a mad scientist? Mate, that’s just true. You can’t get them on the facts.’

To me it’s all ‘a bit off’. Still, I suspect we are yet to reach peak woke.

What will it be — Taylor Swift recontextualising Hitler’s vegetarianism? Kim Kardashian imploring us to consider Genghis Khan’s uniting of the nomadic tribes of Northeast Asia? Mickey Mouse making the case for phrenology?

I shudder to think. But then again, maybe I am just literally trembling with white fear.

Nick Dixon is a stand-up comedian and writer. Follow him on Twitter / Instagram / TikTok: @nickdixoncomic

Picture by: Getty.

Help spiked prick the Covid consensus

So here we are – 14 weeks into Britain’s three-week lockdown. We hope you are all staying sane out there, and that spiked has been of some assistance in that. We have ramped up our output of late, to provide a challenge to the Covid consensus. But we couldn’t have done that without your support. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is completely free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you enjoy our work, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can donate here.Thank you! And stay well.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Comments

forgotusername again

27th June 2020 at 5:13 am

The mainstreaming of Farrakhan and his acolytes is nothing new.

A 2018 Rasmussen poll found that 50% of registered Black voters (Democrats ?) held a positive view of Farrakhan.

It is unclear if their support for Farrakhan is predicated on his hatred of Jews (and white people) or in spite of it.

Former leaders of the popular Democrat “Women’s March” (Tamika Mallory, Linda Sarsour & “Bob” Bland) cited Farrakhan’s “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews” to first condemn, and then justify the removal of Jewish women from leadership positions.

Two of the most influential and powerful Democratic Congresswomen Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib take turns emulating the good Minister:

Omar invoked Der Sturmer styled “dual loyalty” and “nefarious Jewish money” tropes with her gleeful “…all about the Benjamins…” Jew smear.

Rashida Tlaib blithely retweeted a blood libel of an unsourced, unproven, and untrue claim that Israeli Jews kidnapped and executed a seven-year-old Palestinian boy.

Fortunately for the Democrat Party, the lemming-like loyalty of Jewish Democrats is unbreakable and short of introducing legislation to mandate they wear Star of David armbands 70% of them will vote for Farrakhans Party of choice.

L Strange

22nd June 2020 at 7:48 pm

Reminds me of the fawning over Ta Nehisi Coates by self-flagellating white folks. It’s got something of the same flavour to it, though the Coates-ians probably have better reading comprehension than the recent entryists of Team Farrakhan.

One of the reasons that Malcom X fell out with the Nation of Islam ‘purists’ is that he found out that their Big-Headed Scientist Yakub theory (yeah, apparently he’s supposed to have had a freakishly massive head!??) had absolutely nothing to do with Islam. He visited Saudi and the clerics he spoke to were pretty shocked at what their supposed American Branch were gibbering about.

Vivian Darkbloom

22nd June 2020 at 8:50 pm

Ta Nehisi Coates’ promotion of “black pessimism” is very dispiriting. “Between the World and Me” was a very depressing experience and I was relieved to finish it despite enjoying the fluid prose stylings. Immediately after I read Thomas Chatterton Williams’ “Losing My Cool” and it was a much more positive and uplifting read which restored – briefly – the optimistic side of my character.

Ta Nehisi Coates has nothing on Schopenhauer as regards pessimist philosophy. He’s much more of a nihilist, which seems to chime more with the zeitgeist; hence his relative popularity I suppose. Or is it that he appeals to the performative guilt of rich dim-witted white Americans?

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.