Drag Queen Story Time is not okay

Having drag queens perform for kids isn't open-minded or liberal – it's just creepy.

Jo Bartosch

Topics Feminism UK

I’m sure many of us have often thought that what’s missing from the early-years curriculum are men with plastic tits and spangly dresses reading books. But fear not, SNP MP Mhairi Black is on a mission to right this crushing injustice, championing the rights of queer-identifying five-year-olds across Scotland.

Last month, Black accompanied Nathan Mullen, a drag queen who performs under the name ‘FlowJob’, to Glencoats primary school to mark LGBT History Month. Mullen does work for an initiative for kids called ‘Drag Queen Story Time’ (DQST). And in addition to reading to reception classes at Glencoats, the pair educated the children about Section 28, a law introduced in 1988 (now repealed) that banned the ‘promotion of homosexuality’.

Shortly after the visit, it became apparent that Mullen’s social media was full of adult content. A gale-force Twitterstorm erupted, with the Glencoats’ headteacher, Mullen and Black accused of failing in their duty to protect children. Predictably, those who questioned the rationale behind inviting an adult entertainer into a primary school were smeared as bigots. Black tweeted that the criticisms were homophobic, and that a visit from a gay MP and drag queen when she was at school ‘would have made an immeasurable difference’ to the ‘difficult childhoods’ endured by her and her ‘LGBT classmates’.

Unlike Black and Mullen, I came of age under Section 28, and I never want to see people hidden away or made to feel ashamed of who they love. But it is fair to ask who exactly benefits from DQST – because, arguably, it isn’t children.

Pioneered by ‘queer activist’ Michelle Tea, DQST events were first trialled in 2015 at a public library in San Francisco. Now it has migrated over to Britain, too. Last month the British Library promoted an event with children’s drag entertainer Alyssa Van Delle, calling Van Delle a ‘hot’ performer who will ‘have you on the edge of your seat and gagging for more’.

DQST claims to offer ‘queer role models’ to children. But despite the popularity of its events, it remains unclear how a man in a lurid frock will make kids with two mums feel supported, or how DQST serves to stop the bullying of kids who don’t conform. Britain is a remarkably tolerant country and many children will have a same-sex couple somewhere in their family; aunties Clare and Kate are likely to be better role models than adult entertainers with X-rated social-media feeds.

DQST has been widely praised as ‘teaching tolerance’, but one of the great things about young children is that they don’t really have any preconceptions to challenge. DQST seems just to be an opportunity for straight middle-class parents to feel worthy and to bond over a post-performance soy macchiato.

Still, there is something more sinister to DQST. The male drag performers going into schools and libraries are routinely introduced to children as ‘she’. In this way, far from challenging stereotypes, DQST performances underscore the idea that womanhood is a gaudy, sexualised costume. Children are introduced to the use of preferred pronouns and the concept, popularised by queer theory, that ‘gender is a performance’.

At a fundamental level, this creates a disjuncture between what the child knows to be true and what the child is compelled to say. In this way, DQST teaches compliance; it is the conceit of arrogant activists who seek to indoctrinate children, not educate them. That this is happening under the guise of ‘inclusivity’ and within libraries and schools is a bitter irony.

There is some disquiet from within the drag scene itself about DQST. Gay drag queen Kitty Demure has compared DQST to having ‘a stripper or a porn star to influence your child’.

In a video that rapidly went viral, Demure addressed DQST’s fans, who want to show the world they’re not ‘Nazis’ or ‘homophobes’, telling them: ‘Honestly, you’re not doing the gay community any favours. In fact, you’re hurting us. We have already had a reputation of being paedophiles, and being perverts, and deviants. We don’t need you to bring your children around.’

To my mind, DQST is a sinister attempt to force an adult ideology on to children. Accusations of homophobia have been weaponised to silence critics. As Mhairi Black’s reaction to the Glencoats controversy shows, motivations must not be questioned when they come wrapped in sparkles and rainbows.

It seems we have learned nothing. Yet again, fears of ‘isms’ and causing offence have been put ahead of safeguarding. I fear the legacy of DQST will last long after Mullen has hung up his wig and size-10 stilettos.

Jo Bartosch is a journalist campaigning for the rights of women and girls.

Picture by: Getty.

Let’s cancel cancel culture

Free speech is under attack from all sides – from illiberal laws, from a stifling climate of conformity, and from a powerful, prevailing fear of being outed as a heretic online, in the workplace, or even among friends, for uttering a dissenting thought. This is why we at spiked are stepping up our fight for speech, expanding our output and remaking the case for this most foundational liberty. But to do that we need your help. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you want to support us, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can find out more and sign up here. Thank you! And keep speaking freely.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Ward Anthony

3rd March 2020 at 11:55 pm

This is happening here in Australia too.
What’s staggering is the hypocrisy. When a chaplaincy program was proposed for schools there were outcries of ‘indoctrination’! Yet a gay man in drag talking about gender issues… no social engineering or agendas there.

Ellen Whitaker

3rd March 2020 at 9:54 pm

I’m ashamed to admit that I’m confused. Is a drag queen a hyper-sexualized “G” performer, or a “T”?

The thing that scares me about DQST is that parents seem to have no power to prevent it.

Jim Lawrie

3rd March 2020 at 4:14 pm

Neotony has always been highly valued in the homosexaul world. Look at Oscar Wilde’s travels throughout Europe. Access to children is the prize most sought.

Ellen Whitaker

3rd March 2020 at 10:26 pm

Some homosexuals are pedophiles; most aren’t.
Some heterosexuals are pedophiles; most aren’t.

Susan Potter

3rd March 2020 at 11:14 pm

Yes…but the percentages aren’t the same…40%trans male inmates coming violent sexual crimes..as oppose to 19% norm prison pop..
And males are 20 times more paraphilic than females…so for a smaller lgb t pop…do they have higher percentage..of paraphilias..

Jessica Goldfinch

3rd March 2020 at 12:56 pm

I don’t mind blowing my own trumpet, but I’m a really good story-teller.

Grew up on it, with voices & actions, joining in, promenade performances…and passed it on to my daughter.

Lots of memories of us doing this during the 70s blackouts.

But as an enhanced DBS checked, menopausal, slightly wrinkled woman, who rarely wears makeup & dresses in everyday clothes is clearly no competition for sexualised parodies of women, flouncing about in tuck-wear.

The children’s faces at these events say it all. They know. Their instinctive boundaries are being eroded. It’s grooming.

These blokes have no boundaries.

Mightily hacked off with their effin entitled bs tbh.


3rd March 2020 at 1:50 pm

Are you Disgusted of Tunbridge Wells?

Rosie Maxima

3rd March 2020 at 4:03 pm

I agree, it is nothing more than manipulative grooming. And the kids do know. Why do adults always conveniently forget how it was to be a child and that we were really never very interested in having sex stuff rammed down our throats? I remember our very corny sex education classes where we had to watch a nudist family cavorting on a beach and a couple in slow mo ‘doing it’. If anything it caused us to feel very embarrassed and looking back, probably the real feeling was semi-violated. Real sex education happens organically and naturally through something called “growing up”.

Ven Oods

3rd March 2020 at 10:49 am

I’m waiting for the inevitable agitation to subject infants at school to a BDSM protagonist, just in case any of them fancies a life of ultraviolence.


3rd March 2020 at 1:47 pm

Just move to London if you like ultraviolence.

Danny Rees

3rd March 2020 at 9:52 am

Ok but is Spiked now calling for bans?

Stuart Mack

3rd March 2020 at 11:56 am

I don’t think anyone is calling for bans, rather that inviting drag queens into primary schools seems a bit sinister. If the children’s parents were informed and everybody was happy with it, then fair enough. It depends on what is said and what the pupose is. Where do you stop though. Why not teach sex education with real models?

Susan Potter

3rd March 2020 at 11:07 pm

Why teach primary age kids about sex…end of
They only need to know…boy/girl…male/female….and that those sexes are different…..and why….respect themselves and others regardless of the sex….gender comes later …

Jerry Owen

3rd March 2020 at 12:00 pm

Bans aren’t always a bad thing. Allowing children to be exposed to perversion is wrong and so yes, let’s have a ban.


3rd March 2020 at 1:49 pm

How’s the weather in Thanet, Jerry?

Jerry Owen

3rd March 2020 at 4:18 pm

Stormy in your little water logged brain is it ?
No comment on my correcting you on the coal mine closures on the XR thread ?

Danny Rees

3rd March 2020 at 7:32 pm

Ok then so it’s agreed that some censorship is good.

Chester Minnit

3rd March 2020 at 2:10 pm

I wouldn’t ban anyone from dressing or indeed undressing how they pleased, I would however ask them to consider where they do it.

Young children are not an appropriate audience for cross-dressers – that’s for the bedroom, the nightclub or the carnival float.

And before anyone (cough cough Zenobia) says that children should be exposed to gender diversity I’d respectfully ask you to read this article:-


Jerry Owen

3rd March 2020 at 8:31 am

‘Flowjob’ is of course a take on ‘blowjob’ it’s having a joke on little kids that don’t recognize it for what it really is.
It’s basically having a laugh at little kids expense.. a nudge nudge wink wink.. look at me I’ve had one over on the kids
If that is the attitude of this creature towards innocent kids he is debauched and sick in the head.

Rosie Maxima

3rd March 2020 at 3:56 pm

I too found that name and its hidden agenda to be very disturbing.

Linda Payne

3rd March 2020 at 7:44 am

Bet they don’t do this at Eton


3rd March 2020 at 1:46 pm

I bet they do.

H McLean

3rd March 2020 at 7:33 am

They’re grooming children to believe that no level of degeneracy is unacceptable. The overwhelming majority of people have no problem with people being gay, but queer is something else.

It’s important to understand the distinction, queer is the politicisation of being gay. It’s taking a supposedly ‘born this way’ state and using it to force society to submit to a postmodern political ideology that demands the erosion of the family unit.

Idiots like Mhari Black think that being gay gives them a right to force queer neoMarxist ideology on an unsuspecting public that only wants to be decent to their fellow human beings. It’s time to stop being afraid of being called ‘phobic’ by these activists. They are not your friends and they certainly do not have our children’s best interests at heart.

Rosie Maxima

3rd March 2020 at 4:05 pm

Very well said.

Susan Potter

3rd March 2020 at 11:00 pm

Agree…why would children be interested in the paraphilias…unless it’s the paraphilias who are interested in the children…yes..it’s called grooming…


3rd March 2020 at 1:11 am

To be fair, Mhairi is not the sharpest tool in the box.

Ven Oods

3rd March 2020 at 10:49 am

I doubt she’s the sharpest tool within her own choice of clothing on any particular day.


3rd March 2020 at 1:46 pm

Mhairi’s fashion choices are highly suspect.

Jerry Colonna

3rd March 2020 at 10:52 am

That comment makes no sense. Par the course with a racist nonce apologist.


3rd March 2020 at 1:46 pm

Bourgeois hypocrite. It made perfect sense.

Danny Rees

3rd March 2020 at 7:32 pm

I want way is this person a “nonce apologist”?

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.

Deplorables — a spiked film