Cambridge students say they could be ‘triggered’ by soldiers

The British Army has committed its worst atrocity yet: hurting students’ feelings.


Topics Politics UK

Cambridge University Students Union (CUSU) has said that the presence of soldiers at its annual freshers’ fair could ‘trigger’ students.

A motion to ban armed-forces personnel from carrying weapons at the freshers’ fair passed this week by 55 per cent. Stella Swain, the CUSU welfare officer who proposed the motion, said that the presence of soldiers could damage students’ mental health.

Army bods have hit back. Colonel Kemp, former commander of British forces in Afghanistan, told the Telegraph that the students were being ‘pathetic, to say the very least’.

CUSU’s move was part of a broader campaign to ‘demilitarise’ the university.

What is most striking here is not these students’ opposition to the military per se (Britain has certainly embroiled itself in numerous bloody conflicts), but the way in which their opposition to the military takes the form of complaints about their hurty feelings.

It is extraordinary that ‘the potential to detrimentally affect’ the ‘mental welfare’ of Cambridge students, as one SU officer put it, can even come up in discussions of British militarism. Cambridge students must be among the most pampered and privileged young people in the world. The narcissism is astonishing.

Perhaps these students can take some comfort in the military’s recent efforts to go woke. A recent Ministry of Defence (MoD) report emphasised the army’s desire to be more diverse and to be ‘recognised as a force for inclusion in wider society’.

Last year, the army launched a PR campaign of posters and TV ads calling on ‘snowflakes’, ‘selfie addicts’, ‘class clowns’, ‘phone zombies’ and ‘me me me millennials’ to sign up. One poster says: ‘Snowflakes – your army needs YOU and your compassion.’

And if that’s not enough, the army also plans to go green by phasing out fossil fuels in its trucks and tanks. Senior general Sir Mark Carlton wants the MoD to be ‘on the right side of the environmental argument, especially in the eyes of that next generation of recruits’.

But if today’s students are triggered by the mere sight of soldiers and guns, then these efforts are unlikely to pass muster.

Picture by: Getty.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Neil John

9th February 2020 at 4:35 pm

Ah Cambridge, home of cheating quizmasters who favour their alma mater, professional mismanagement of staff and screwed up the Academics USS pension scheme. Time the tax man took a long hard look at all the endowment income from legacies and properties?

T Hauxwell

6th February 2020 at 12:12 pm

I imagine Colonel Kemp and his colleagues wouldn’t want regiments full of molly coddled sissies anyway. They wouldn’t make it through basic training if the sight of a bit of camouflage gives them the vapours. The Duke of Wellington famously called the British Army the scum of the earth. He certainly didn’t refer to them as the over-educated spawn of the middling classes. CUSU has done the army a favour. Now they don’t have to bother spending money trying to recruit perpetual toddlers, they can go out and find young men and women with the backbone to get their hands dirty, and give them a job.

Michael Lynch

6th February 2020 at 10:09 am

What do you expect from a University that gave us Burgess and Maclean?

nick hunt

5th February 2020 at 9:16 pm

They confuse their defenders with their attackers. Could this be peak woke?

Jerry Owen

5th February 2020 at 10:03 pm

.. As opposed to Rod Liddle’s ‘peak w*nk’?

Coli Bailey

5th February 2020 at 8:04 pm

So are these poor things not going to use UK airports where there are armed police or go to the many other countries where the police are armed and in plain sight or the US where a large proportion of the population have firearms?

Jerry Owen

5th February 2020 at 8:46 pm

They won’t use airports it goes against their eco beliefs.


5th February 2020 at 11:45 pm

No, it’s their social inferiors that they want to stop using airports

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.