New York City’s war on free speech

Employers and landlords who use the phrase ‘illegal alien’ could now be fined.

Brian Ericson

Topics Free Speech USA

New York City’s Commission on Human Rights has declared that the use of terms like ‘illegal alien’ by employers and landlords, to pejoratively describe undocumented people, is now punishable by fines of up to $250,000. New guidelines state that such speech violates laws against employee and tenant discrimination. This is government overreach under the guise of social justice.

The language of the guidelines is incredibly broad. ‘Threatening to call ICE when motivated by discrimination, derogatory use of the term “illegal alien”, and discrimination based on limited English proficiency are unlawful discriminatory treatment under the NYC human-rights law’, the commision has announced. It added that ‘use of the term “illegal alien”, among others, when used with intent to demean, humiliate, or harass a person, is illegal under the law’.

The new guidedlines won’t incriminate the average New Yorker walking down the street, as it applies only to employers, landlords and business owners. What’s more, similar anti-harassment laws have stood up in court before, and have been found not to violate First Amendment rights to free speech.

But the commission’s guidelines take discrimination bans to a new level. Previous anti-discrimination laws require evidence of ‘severe or pervasive’ conduct that can be objectively proven as harassment or discrimination. This new ban claims that severe and pervasive conduct is ‘only relevant to the damages’ caused by such behaviour. But how can we determine what kind of ‘damages’ are caused by such conduct? By what quantifiable measure can it be determined? The commission doesn’t provide a clear answer to this, thus paving the way for the state subjectively to punish all kinds of insensitive speech as discriminatory.

The new guidelines only get muddier from here. Threatening to call ICE ‘when motivated by discrimination’ or calling someone an illegal alien ‘when used with intent to demean, humiliate, or harass’ is now punishable by a fine. So it’s not enough for the commission to restrict speech. Apparently it is also itching to police intent. But how that intent is to be discerned also remains a mystery; all kinds of speech could thus be branded discriminatory.

As is so often the case these days, this authoritarian move has been branded a step towards social justice. The commission’s chair declared that the ruling was ‘one of the most protective in the nation’ and claimed it was necessary ‘in the face of increasingly hostile national rhetoric’. Now, terms like ‘illegal’ and ‘alien’ are dehumanising. Perhaps the term should be written out of US Code. Meanwhile, we as individuals should endeavour to see and talk about our fellow humans with more compassion. But the idea of prohibiting speech in this way – and even policing the motivation behind speech – is frighteningly Orwellian.

These new guidelines are only the latest step in New York City’s ongoing encroachments on free speech, which has included similarly overbearing regulations in the name of preventing sexual, racial and religious harassment. Perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised to see this coming from the least free city in America’s least free state. But the ban is still an unconstitutional exercise, and it desperately needs to go.

Brian Ericson is a Young Voices contributor based in Nashville. Follow him on Twitter: @brianscott67.

Picture by: Getty.

Rod Liddle and Brendan O'Neill
– live in London

Podcast Live

Podcast Live, Friends House, London, NW1 2BJ – 5 October 2019, 2.30pm-3.30pm

To get tickets, click the button below, then scroll down to The Brendan O'Neill Show logo on the Podcast Live page.

Help spiked prick the Covid consensus

So here we are – 15 weeks into Britain’s three-week lockdown. We hope you are all staying sane out there, and that spiked has been of some assistance in that. We have ramped up our output of late, to provide a challenge to the Covid consensus. But we couldn’t have done that without your support. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is completely free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you enjoy our work, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can donate here.Thank you! And stay well.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Gordon Miller

4th October 2019 at 4:58 pm

So, is Sting going to be arrested the next time he steps foot in NY? Or will he be arrested if he plays “Englishman in New York”, at his next NY gig?
Will New Yorker’s be arrested for playing the song at home on the stereo, a neighbor dials 911 and the cops arrive, will that person be arrested.
These may seem like stupid questions, but they have to be asked. You could be sitting on the subway listening to Sting at full blast, unlikely i know, and the person next to you is illegally in the US, they hear it, report you as soon as you and them get off, could you be arrested?
I know this won’t happen, probably. I hope. In fact it probably would. They are the people who are breaking the laws, but they get the protection! This is why #Trump2020

Andrew Leonard

4th October 2019 at 3:39 pm

The term ‘illegal alien’ refers to a person that has not met a certain standard – specifically, the legal requirements for becoming a citizen of the USA.

There are numerous standards in a multitude of domains that are required to keep a modern society functioning. The only direction that these standards should be negotiable, is upwards. Consideration for ‘hurt feelings’ and arbitrary claims of dehumanising effects, should be dismissed out of hand. Civilisation was neither built nor maintained by carefully tending to the subjective concerns of the weak minded. In fact, ‘care’ policies should be considered as potential or actual trojan horses.

If I had to sum up the problems with Western civilisation in one sentence, it would be:
The current orientation of Western culture, centres on across the board attacks and an undermining of social, cultural and political standards, most of which have been built up over many decades or centuries, for the benefit of both pragmatic and ideological agendas.

Most of these agendas are political, but some are financial (think sub-prime mortgages), and some are cultural (body positivity, modern art). The constant white-anting and all out attacks on standards is unsustainable, but how this trend is going to be reversed is a matter for speculation. If and how it is reversed will form a major element of 21st century history.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.