Trump’s high crimes and misdemeanours

If impeachment is the only way to hold our corrupt president to account, so be it.

Wendy Kaminer
columnist

Share
Topics Politics USA

‘Darker spirits’ have been cavorting in the halls of Congress, the House chaplain, a Jesuit priest, intoned in an 18 July chamber prayer: ‘In Your most holy name, I now cast out all spirits of darkness from this chamber; spirits not from You.’

Desperate times, desperate measures, but the exorcism failed. One week later, Republican Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell refused to allow bipartisan election security bills to reach the Senate floor for a vote. Why? As McConnell correctly stated, legislation aimed at safeguarding elections from foreign (or domestic) interference and requiring campaigns to report offers of help from foreign agents to the FBI would confer a ‘political benefit’ upon Democrats.

This is the state of our union. The Senate majority leader feels free to state openly and shamelessly that he chooses preserving Republican power over defending the integrity of our elections and protecting our democracy. He need not don even a pretense of patriotism. There is no real dispute about the fact that Russian operatives interfered in the 2016 election, on the side of Donald Trump, ‘in sweeping and systematic fashion’, the Mueller Report documented and Robert Mueller personally confirmed to Congress. His testimony was halting and its ‘optics’ were widely disparaged, but on the subject of election interference he was forceful and clear. Russians are preparing attacks on the 2020 election, ‘as we sit here’, Mueller testified, while other foreign actors are developing similar plans and capabilities. Or as a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report found, Russia targeted election systems in all 50 states in 2016, in what is suspected to have been a reconnaissance mission, seeking out vulnerabilities for future attacks. Russia’s cyber-activities pose a ‘real and urgent threat’, Republican Senate Intelligence Committee chair Richard Burr warned, to no avail. The president refuses to acknowledge the future threat or the previous, heavily documented Russian assistance he received in 2016, and the Senate majority leader is content to allow foreign interference so long as it aims to benefit Republicans.

Privately many Republicans in Congress are critical and wary of their ignorant, thuggish, autocratic president. Publicly they praise and pander to him in order to retain favour with the Republican base. Trump doesn’t have to shoot someone in broad daylight on Fifth Avenue to demonstrate his cultish support, as he once assured us he could do without consequence. He has been shown to have welcomed Russian electoral interference in his behalf, to have lied about his business dealings with Russia during the 2016 campaign, when he hoped to build or brand a Trump Tower in Moscow, to have lied repeatedly about his efforts to obstruct the Mueller investigation and to have lied in written testimony to Mueller. Still Republican obeisance to him has not wavered.

Trump and his congressional acolytes respond to these damning facts mostly by ignoring them and distracting their voters with conspiracy fantasies, painting the always aggrieved president as the victim of an attempted ‘deep state’ coup. (You’d never know Republicans once tried impeaching Bill Clinton merely for lying about sex.) They respond to these facts by race-baiting virtually everyone and red-baiting Democrats, labelling them socialists or even communists in a callback to the 1950s. No matter that socialists are a tiny minority among Democrats, communists are non-existent, and the Republican party favours arguably socialist subsidies for its farming base, as well as generous corporate welfare programmes.

Republicans have helped Trump smash through the ‘guardrails’ and constitutional norms that were once supposed to contain him. ‘I have the right to do whatever I want as president’, he recently declared. Of course Trump doesn’t have that right under the Constitution (which he has probably never read), but supine Republicans have given him that power – after lambasting Obama’s exercises of executive authority. These days, believing in the health and resilience of American democracy or the patriotism of the president and his minions is like believing in the tooth fairy, or the House chaplain’s attempted exorcism.

In relatively normal or less abnormal times, we could hope to vote the administration out of office, but given the documented vulnerabilities of our electoral systems and decreasing faith in their fairness, thanks partly to successful voter-suppression campaigns and false claims of voter fraud, that hope dims. An impeachment effort by the Democratic House may prove necessary and inevitable, even though it is bound to fail in the Republican Senate. Indeed, as some legal commentators have suggested, the House Judiciary Committee has effectively begun an impeachment inquiry by asking a federal court for access to grand jury testimony underlying the Mueller Report. The inquiry will be divisive, but no more so than the racially charged re-election campaign on which the president has already embarked. The impeachment process could at least draw attention to his high crimes and misdemeanors. It could, perhaps, restore some focus on the facts.

‘Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.’ Usually attributed to the late senator and presidential adviser Daniel Patrick Moynihan, this pithy statement of the obvious has never seemed more quaint.

Wendy Kaminer is an author, a lawyer and a former national board member of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Picture by: Getty.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Comments

Prodos Marinakis

2nd August 2019 at 7:31 pm

I thought for a moment I was reading The Onion.

kevin king

30th July 2019 at 11:30 pm

I would suggest the author sticks to the law. Her ignorance of what has been going on in American politics for the last 3 years is breathtaking.

Jerry Owen

31st July 2019 at 8:30 am

I keep saying that Trump could find a cure for cancer and he would still not get any credit. Kaminer like most ‘never Trumpers’ is incapable of logical joined up thinking, I’m surprised Spiked can’t do better than her. By all means have articles critical of Trump .. but these written by Kaminer are quite dreadful, especially when she deliberately misleads people by manipulating quotes. Kaminer has yet to commend Trump for anything whatsoever he has achieved .
Like him or loathe him he has made some smart moves.

Neil McCaughan

30th July 2019 at 7:08 pm

Of what is President Trump guilty?

Putting the Clinton gargoyle in her place? The world owes him thanks.

His success with the economy? 5.8 million fewer Americans are dependent on food stamps than when his useless predecessor was in office.

His personal success with women? Unlike Clinton he didn’t have t resort to rape, and unlike Obama he didn’t have to to settle for a Wookiee.

Trashing bien-pensant progressives with a well turned tweet?

Appointing judges to the Supreme Court as is his right?

Well what?

Hana Jinks

30th July 2019 at 7:37 pm

Insane stuff.

Jerry Owen

31st July 2019 at 8:38 am

Neil you are guilty off letting hard facts get in the way of Kaminers bigotry !
Kaminer is a never Trumper, so we can enjoy her tears again in 2020 !

Emmett Elvin

30th July 2019 at 6:54 pm

The Spiked editors must have thought it was feeding time at the zoo to toss their readership such laughable tosh. Sadly, not only is there no meat on these bones, it’s indigestible offal. A cursory sniff and then walk away was all this reader could manage.

Robert Weitzer

30th July 2019 at 5:16 pm

Aren’t there a thousand other sites that rehash Democratic party talking points in editorial form? Spiked’s American coverage is getting really weak… The dems want to control the flow of information. Period. Of course they won’t hesitate to use the fbi and other intelligence agencies to dig up dirt on republicans. But this will be exempt from claims of “foreign interference.” This is a partisan hack piece.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.