When did tourism become a crime?

Venice’s new rules for tourists are making life hell for locals, too.

Dominic Standish

Topics Politics World

This month, two German tourists were fined a total of €950 and banished from Venice. Their crime? Making coffee on a portable cooker near the steps of the Rialto Bridge. Photographs show that they were not obstructing anyone and there was no evidence of any littering. So why were they treated so harshly?

In May, Venice City Council approved a range of new regulations. Wrongdoers can be sanctioned with fines from €25 to €500 and can even be handed a ban from the local area, known in Italian as a Daspo. The Daspo was introduced in Italy to ban football hooligans from football stadiums. Venice City Council agreed to apply a city-wide Daspo to anyone charged with ‘anti-social’ behaviour. In the first three weeks since the new regulations were agreed, 26 people were issued with Daspo orders.

So what constitutes anti-social behaviour under the new regulations? First, noisy stag or hen-type parties and even university-degree celebrations (an important Venetian tradition in a city with many students) are banned from Monday to Thursday between 8pm and 8am. During the same hours, although every day this time, there is a ban on consuming alcohol outside designated areas. From 2021, plastics will be banned from all bars, restaurants and takeaway outlets. Even before these new rules, there was already a €200 fine for sitting down outside to consume food or drinks, except within designated areas. Similarly, last year, Florence imposed fines of up to €500 for people eating outside in some parts of the city centre.

Bathing suits have been targeted by the authorities, too. Venice has banned wearing a bikini or being bare-chested while walking through the city or travelling on a boat. An unfortunate 23-year old Canadian tourist was fined €250 for sunbathing in a bikini in Venice’s public gardens at the end of June. Barcelona City Council also now fines people for wearing bathing suits in its city centre.

Tourists are forbidden from placing ‘love lock’ padlocks on railings. Bicycles are banned from the historical centre and kids’ scooters are only permitted outside areas where there are monuments – and only if the rider is under 12 years old. Three French tourists were fined €100 each for locking up their bikes and leaving them in an alleyway. Two British tourists faced a double fine for troubling nobody at all: they were fined €250 each for being bare-chested and €100 each for pushing their bikes – by hand – through Venice’s historic centre.

Worse still, other Italian cities have followed suit. In early June, Rome’s City Council agreed to start fining people for bathing in fountains, dressing as centurions, taking part in pub crawls, being bare-chested, dragging wheeled suitcases over historic staircases, ticket touting, eating near monuments, singing on public transport, and even for hanging laundry out to dry between buildings – a local, Roman habit.

As this last example shows, while many of these measures are aimed at tourists, they place restrictions on local people, too. Thanks to Venice’s nighttime ban on outdoor drinking, organisers of traditional summer Venetian street parties found they needed to apply for permits for the first time ever. Many simply cancelled their parties. What’s more, the ‘locals’, whom measures like these are supposed to protect, travel as well. Venetians will also be tourists in other cities in both Italy and around the world.

Cities ought to be welcoming visitors. But after years of concern about ‘overtourism’ – with local councils essentially treating tourists as environmental and cultural hazards – it is no surprise that tourists are now being criminalised. Venice could certainly manage tourism better. But it is not faced with anywhere near the levels of ‘anti-social behaviour’ that could ever justify such petty restrictions.

From Venice to Rome, Barcelona and Amsterdam, local councillors are treating normal behaviour which harms no one as criminal. This needs to stop.

Dominic Standish is the author of Venice in Environmental Peril? Myth and Reality. Visit his website here.

Picture by: Getty.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Hana Jinks

30th July 2019 at 7:48 pm

This is beyond how gay a thing that I’d comment on.

This surely calls inro question the gay agenda of spiiiiked. Its just too gay.

Hana Jinks

30th July 2019 at 7:49 pm


Jane 70

29th July 2019 at 3:23 pm

This is a silly and biased article: having lived for many years in Bath, I know from direct experience, that mass tourism is not an unalloyed good .

Pressures on space, local infrastructure, plus noise, mess and congestion leave their mark.

Locals who have long standing family ties are forced out of cities like Bath and Barcelona and Venice, unable to find affordable accommodation. Many of those affected supply the essential labour which keeps the tourist industry flourishing and many are poorly paid.

I can recall well the mounting frustration felt by many Bathonians when local bus stops were regularly blocked by illegally parked tourist buses. The council eventually took action, but this took time.

Here in my small town on Scotland’s west coast, we have to endure an annual noisy, extremely badly behaved influx of teens, who drink, fight, have sex in public on the beach and generally make a nuisance of themselves.

This pattern is repeated in neighbouring towns and spoils everything, both for locals and visiting families with young children.

The local cops now have a special task force, to try and contain the invasions, but I know of friends and acquaintances who’ve found teens drinking and sunbathing in their gardens .

The sheer numbers of people travelling create pressures which responsible city authorities are doing their best to contain, in the hope that unique cities like Barcelona and Venice will not succumb to irreversible damage and decline.

Of course people want to travel and enjoy new places of interest, but there must be a balance between the mass tourism industry’s agenda and the interests of local residents.

Keith Phillips

29th July 2019 at 3:03 pm

The obvious intention behind these new outright draconian laws is fairly simple to understand if you think about it, only rich people who know how to behave in the proper manner are allowed to travel to other countries. The rest of us plebs have to stay home and put up with life’s drudgery , don’t worry though the important people have figured out a way to alleviate at least some of that drudgery for us rather than allow the likes of us to travel to far off exotic lands they will instead send us an endless supply of culturally enriched invaders er sorry immigrants for us to play with here at home, mostly those from third world African and Middle Eastern countries! I mean what more could we ask for?

Jerry Owen

29th July 2019 at 2:13 pm

Disagree with this article , Venice is almost a museum , it is also sinking, It needs to be respected not trashed by yobs who would be better suited to Ibeza.
Venice is steeped in culture and history.

Jim Lawrie

29th July 2019 at 3:10 pm

No pun intended with the word “steeped”?

Jim Lawrie

29th July 2019 at 10:45 am

When did alcohol and cocaine fuelled mobs of bullies become tourists?

The authorities shirk their responsibility for dealing with the sale of these products.

So called stag and hen parties are banned from many cities and almost all accommodation, so they’ve most likely lied in order to be there in such groups.

Yvonne Marascalchi

29th July 2019 at 9:53 am

Have you been to Venice recently? It’s a complete shambles overrun by tourists, many of whom have no idea how to behave or dress appropriately. Consequently rules have to be applied and, if necessary, fines handed out. My husband was born there and we make annual visits so I have followed the deterioration of the city first hand.

Jim Lawrie

29th July 2019 at 3:12 pm

It’s the same in the tourist hotspots in the North of Scotland.

Ven Oods

29th July 2019 at 9:20 am

Surely, it’s not the tourism that’s being targeted; it’s the thoughtless behaviour?
Example: I’m a tourist, so I’m on holiday. I can party on my balcony until 3am every night, because I can sleep as late as I like. Not so the poor local next door, who needs his kip before going out to work next day.
Businesses love mass tourism; local residents, not so much; hence the recent restrictions on Airbnb, where empty properties are given over to short-stay visitors who have nothing to lose from any antisocial behaviour.

christopher barnard

29th July 2019 at 9:05 am

All this sounds like xenophobia to me. I’m surprised that liberals are not voicing their disgust.

Oh, I forgot. Most of them hate tourism as it ruins their cultured ‘travel’ arrangements.

Stephen J

29th July 2019 at 8:29 am

This is EU thinking at work.

They are busily creating a museum across over 60% of the continent, daft buggers.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.