Marcus Ball thinks you’re thick

The man behind the Boris Johnson legal action admitted as much to spiked’s Tom Slater.


Topics Brexit Politics UK

Marcus Ball is in the news today. He’s the bloke who has crowdfunded a legal action against Boris Johnson, alleging the Vote Leave leader committed misconduct in public office when he said during the referendum that the UK gave £350million a week to the EU.

We won’t get into the £350million debate again. Let’s just say that all politicians spin, voters know this, and we’re still waiting on George Osborne to apologise for his mad claim that Brexit would cost us all £4,300 a piece.

What’s more worrying here is that well-funded individuals – Ball used some of the cash he raised to pay for a plush London flat, professional headshots and ‘self-defence classes’ – are being allowed to haul politicians they disagree with before the courts.

Ball’s lawyers insist his campaign did not aim to ‘prevent Brexit’, even though, as the Telegraph reports, his original crowdfunder used precisely those words. He was also pretty explicit about what he thought about voters when he debated spiked’s Tom Slater at the offices of the Express back in 2016:

But of course, all this taking Boris Johnson to court business has nothing to do with politics, or not liking the referendum result. Would Marcus lie to you?

Picture by: YouTube.

What we could do with your £5 per month

For less than the cost of two copies of the Guardian, you can help spiked become bigger and better and bolshier than ever. All of our articles and podcasts and essays are free, and we want to keep it that way. But to do so we ask our wonderful readers, if they can afford it, to chip in – ideally with a monthly donation. It might not sound like much, but donating as little as £5 per month has a transformative impact on our work. Knowing that we have your regular support means we can keep going and growing. So if you like our work and want to support us, please do consider signing up.

Thank you!

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Jim Lawrie

16th April 2020 at 12:43 pm

There’s another case in the offing with Aidan O’Neill QC spearheading it. This time to have the courts order Westminster to mandate IndyRef2.

There are plenty out there who think us all too thick to choose the correct government, or form of government.

Aidan O’Neill believes that there are many situations where the law must trump politics. And when we transgress, he’ll step in. If anyone thinks him and his like were seen off by a General Election, think again. They don’t think election results apply to their ideas and politics.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.