The BBC’s story was keen to offer us something else to fret about. Since the coalition government introduced new guidance trusting schools to deal with namecalling and bullying as they see fit, the number of reports of ‘racist’ incidents to local authorities has, apparently, fallen. For dyed-in-the-wool official anti-racists, freeing schools from state monitoring and intervention can mean only one thing: racism in schools will now incubate and grow. In other words, the stats from the New Labour years were simply a wake-up call for how utterly racist British society really is – and official anti-racist policy in schools is the only thing preventing the cultivation of a generation of bad seeds. Moreover, the stats also showed that teachers will only tackle the malignant racism in their midst if they are forced into action by government policy.
None of this could be further from the truth. Today, instances of adult-world racism (both real and imagined) are far more likely to be dragged into the limelight than swept under the carpet. Unlike in the relatively recent past, today it is the rarity of racist violence and prejudice that makes its occurrence so shocking to us. I’m glad we are shocked, but to view such instances as ‘the tip of the iceberg’ is nonsense. And to view instances of playground namecalling, banter and children using words they don’t really understand as also ‘the tip of the iceberg’ is nothing short of surreal.
Twenty-first-century British kids are, if anything, doing anti-racism all by themselves. As the soon-to-be-published 2011 census will show, this is a generation more ethnically and culturally mixed than any before it. In fact, the exponential rise of the ‘mixed-race’ population is mindblowing. Every day, communities of schoolchildren invent a version of colour-blind, multi-ethnic interaction right under the noses of the handwringers. And yes, of course they insult each other and trade ‘inappropriate’ banter – they’re kids!
It’s a particularly cynical, miserable brand of ‘anti-racism’ that wants to convert the world of children behaving childishly into a maelstrom of racist word offences. No doubt this gives the modern-day anti-racist a new role in promoting state intervention in schools before racism takes hold of the wee ones. But while socially engineering a squeaky clean ‘anti-racist’ future may be a good fantasy for some, surely even the most ardent advocate of mandatory racist-incident reporting must know that the figures in the news are actually the product of anti-racist policies and not a reflection of genuine racism?
Sarah Soyei seems, at least, to know that the latest figures are an artefact of the reporting regime. On BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, she accepted that ‘the rising figures are not necessarily due to a rise or fall in racism – it could be due to a local authority taking racism more seriously’. But for Soyei, it feels safe to assume that incidents are ‘notoriously underreported’. She’s right – if schools were pushed far harder, they could no doubt record many more instances of ‘chocolate bar’, ‘blackie’, ‘pastey face’, ‘broccoli head’, and so on. But this ain’t racism.
I appeared on BBC Radio West Midlands the same day to discuss this story. Responding to my criticism of the story, veteran anti-racist campaigner Maxie Hayles said, ‘Oh my God, what a sad day this is, what a sad day to hear someone talking about “trivial incidents” by children, childish behaviour… The reality is that the very fabric of this society is racist and institutional racism is rife here. The local authority and schools need to take over the playground… Some of those young people should be prosecuted. The parents should be held responsible and educated because we’re breeding a lot of young racist thugs. In a few years we won’t be different from any other countries in Europe.’ The presenter interjected: ‘I’ve got to say my experience of schools isn’t that at all Maxie, that’s a little harsh, we’re talking about a minority here!’ Hayles was irritated: ‘A minority! Are you kidding me? You just told me that we’ve got a situation where 80,000 incidents have been recorded in schools over a four-year period!’ Never mind the real lived experience of people in schools. There is now a statistic out there, with a life of its own, which seems to prove that racism is rife. No further discussion is required, no critical faculties need to be engaged.
The practice of schools reporting numbers of ‘racist incidents’ to local authorities began in 2002. So you have to ask, how is it that all those past generations of kids untouched by official anti-racist policy somehow managed to form such a liberal, overwhelmingly anti-racist society of adults? I suspect the answer Maxie Hayles or Sarah Soyei would give is that they didn’t; nothing much has changed and racism just went ‘underground’ to flourish in those nasty white working-class council estates or deep inside our unconscious.
The idea that nothing much has changed requires a grotesque bending of reality assisted, in no small part, by fashionable notions of rotten humanity forever on the cusp of something ugly. But it’s worse than that. Today’s anti-racist mindset erases all trace of politics and power. With racism redefined as a disease of the masses, state policy is held aloft as a righteous purifier.
Adrian Hart is author of Leave Those Kids Alone: How Official Hate-Speech Regulation Interferes in School Life and Manifesto Club report, The Myth of Racist Kids – Anti-Racism Policy and the Regulation of School Life. For more information, visit his website.
For permission to republish spiked articles, please contact Viv Regan.