Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
survey

abc def ghi jkl mno pqrs tuv wxyz index
Survey home
Introduction
Survey responses
RSS feed
Anjana Ahuja
Julian Baggini
Philip Ball
Marlene Oscar Berman
Gustav VR Born
K Eric Drexler
Marcus Du Sautoy
Edmond H Fischer
John Hall
Tim Hunt
Wolfgang Ketterle
Leon Lederman
Matt Ridley
Raymond Tallis
Frank Wilczek
Lewis Wolpert
Austin Williams
Director Future Cities Project


Over the last 20 years, the computer has altered how the architectural profession designs, tests and even builds buildings. From 2-D drawing packages to virtual fly-throughs; from Just-in-Time fabrication data to document management, the computer has undoubtedly opened up new possibilities. But it’s so ubiquitous that celebrating ‘the computer’, per se, is not enough. It can also seem to downplay architects’ creative autonomy and that’s not my intention.

However, it was when I first saw a primitive rapid prototyping device on BBC’s Tomorrow’s World in the early 80s, that I realised that this was the future. Even more exciting than holography, this was a means of inputting data from a computer drawing, which could be turned into a real, live three-dimensional model before your very eyes. By directing a laser into a tank of photopolymer, a 3-D screen image can be transformed into a solid replica.

Its first commercial application is now just 20 years old this year and it is still in its infancy: slow, uneconomic but utterly remarkable. Nowadays, stereolithography or laser sintering, can transform an image into a physical object using cheaper and more accessible machines. The potential for architects and engineers to test out ideas, and explore what elements will look like is exciting enough. The scope for creating the very object - or the whole building - rather than a scale model, is something I may have to wait another 20 years for.