Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
survey

abc def ghi jkl mno pqrs tuv wxyz index
Survey home
Introduction
Survey responses
RSS feed
Anjana Ahuja
Julian Baggini
Philip Ball
Marlene Oscar Berman
Gustav VR Born
K Eric Drexler
Marcus Du Sautoy
Edmond H Fischer
John Hall
Tim Hunt
Wolfgang Ketterle
Leon Lederman
Matt Ridley
Raymond Tallis
Frank Wilczek
Lewis Wolpert
Dr Dennis Hayes
joint president, University and College Union, founder Academics for Academic Freedom


The Socratic dialectic begins with the eristic game; Socrates asks a series of questions, often requiring only ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answers, that force the person questioned into self-contradiction. This method of revealing the falsity of strongly held beliefs leads Socrates’ protagonists into an impasse, or aporia, from which, stunned and confused, they can move from falsity to truth.

Over two millennia later, the Socratic dialectic is more important than ever. Upsetting people’s beliefs is now held to be ‘offensive’ and, fearful of this charge, teachers have abandoned the search for truth in favour of a non-judgemental approach that leads students into a therapeutic impasse. Therapy is the new hemlock