No, vaccines shouldn’t be used to ‘level the playing field’

‘Older populations are whiter’ so should have lower priority for vaccination, say US academics.

spiked

Share
Topics Politics Science & Tech USA

Woke types can’t resist politicising everything. Now, they have even come for the Covid vaccine.

Some US academics are arguing that elderly people should have lower priority for vaccination, because they are more likely to be white. The New York Times picked up the story.

The New York Times story references ethics and health policy expert Harald Schmidt. ‘Older populations are whiter’, he says. ‘Society is structured in a way that enables them to live longer. Instead of giving additional health benefits to those who already had more of them, we can start to level the playing field a bit.’

Yes, you read that right. Here is an academic proposing de-prioritising society’s most Covid-vulnerable – risking their health so as to achieve social justice. With thousands of Americans dying every day, many of them elderly, such a policy would inevitably mean more deaths.

Harvard epidemiologist Marc Lipstich is also referenced in the piece. He says teachers should not be counted as essential workers because they ‘have middle-class salaries, are very often white and they have college degrees’, meaning they are ‘not among the most mistreated of workers’. Exactly why someone’s economic, racial or educational background should dictate the priority of their health is unclear.

It is no doubt true that Covid disproportionately impacts on ethnic minorities and the worst-off. But by far the most vulnerable people in our society are the elderly and those with serious health conditions. The idea that they should be anywhere other than front of the queue for vaccination is absurd. To bring ideological racial and social-justice goals into the equation is even more ridiculous.

Let’s just focus on getting the most at-risk vaccinated as quickly as possible, and leave divisive nonsense like this aside.

Picture by: Getty.

spiked is free, and it always will be, which is why we need your help. We don’t have a paywall, or bonus content for paying customers, because we want our arguments for freedom and democracy, against misanthropy and identity politics, to reach as many people as possible. Which is why we ask those of our readers who can afford it to chip in. One-off donations are hugely appreciated, but monthly donations are even better. They allow us to plan for the future and to grow. Even £5 a month is a huge help. It’s much cheaper than your average magazine subscription, and it ensures that spiked is free and open to all. To make either a monthly or a one-off donation, click here. Thank you for your support.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Share