The monumental madness of toppling Gandhi

It is true that Gandhi made racist remarks, but this does not define his legacy.

Saurav Dutt

Topics Politics UK World

Mahatma Gandhi is now in the proverbial firing line. Statues have become a key target of the Black Lives Matter movement. Earlier this month, demonstrators protesting against the killing of George Floyd daubed ‘racist’ near the base of Gandhi’s statue in London’s Parliament Square. This mirrors the concerns of the #GandhiMustFall campaign in Manchester, which accuses Gandhi of ‘virulent racism’ against South African blacks and argues that celebrating Gandhi promotes the current violence in Kashmir.

Gandhi’s words in South Africa were indeed diabolical. He campaigned in favour of racial segregation, arguing that Indians as a race were superior to ‘savages or the natives of Africa’. He used the racial slur ‘Kaffirs’ to refer to black Africans. Yet the key point to remember here is that Gandhi did not live in 2020. Gandhi arrived in South Africa in 1893. He was 24 years old when he made his remarks. And since then, he went through his own spiritual reformation amid the turbulence of empire.

We should judge people from the standards of the time they lived in, not by how we might feel today. Indeed, that means there will be many monuments to people we now think of as despicable. Public sculpture is a dialogue between the past and the present. If the present finds something about the past repellent, monstrous or abhorrent, then that should certainly be reflected in education and in how statues are presented. But to tear these statues down and to satisfy an emotional bloodlust is counterproductive and intellectually bankrupt.

A free society is not maintained by the brute force of easy answers, but with sometimes incredibly difficult compromises. Tyranny offers the easy answer – eliminating all the statues that displease us. But if we embrace the easy answer, soon there won’t be any statues left.

Those who want to tear down the statues are making a monumental error. The movement against historical statues seems to believe that others have a responsibility to agree with its views – anyone who fails to do so is evil and must be destroyed to the greatest extent possible.

While other social movements sought to win people over, this destruction in the name of tolerance creates an endless civil war that pits groups against each other. It stirs up division and hatred under the false facade of justice. Its only possible outcome is to force everyone to accept one myopic version of history while prohibiting everyone from having their own versions.

Gandhi, like any human being, was fallible. He had a lifetime of great work but also many instances of human frailty. Political error almost torpedoed his efforts. He narrowly escaped an early grave on innumerable occasions. In fact, that is what makes him more human and more inspirational.

One person to take inspiration from Gandhi was Martin Luther King. In 1959, King went on a five-week trip to India with his wife Coretta. During that trip, King met with Jawaharlal Nehru, G Ramachandran of the Gandhi National Memorial Fund, and Vinoba Bhave, a key disciple of Gandhi. When King arrived in New Delhi on 10 February 1959, he made his admiration for Gandhi clear. He said that Gandhian principles were a major influence on the civil-rights struggle in the American South. Given what is being said about Gandhi today, does King’s tacit support of Gandhian principles make him a useful idiot for racism?

Nelson Mandela – another follower of Gandhi – was able to put Gandhi’s racist remarks in context: ‘The prejudice was obvious, but Gandhi was reacting here not to African natives in general but to criminalised natives.’ According to Mandela, ‘we are looking at the young Gandhi yet to become the Mahatma, when he would be without any human prejudice save in favour of truth and justice.’ (1)

If Gandhi goes, could Mandela and King’s statues and monuments soon face the same fate?

Saurav Dutt is an author and political analyst.

(1) In Search of Gandhi: Essays and Reflections, by BR Nanda, Oxford India Paperbacks, 2004.

Help spiked prick the Covid consensus

So here we are – 15 weeks into Britain’s three-week lockdown. We hope you are all staying sane out there, and that spiked has been of some assistance in that. We have ramped up our output of late, to provide a challenge to the Covid consensus. But we couldn’t have done that without your support. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is completely free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you enjoy our work, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can donate here.Thank you! And stay well.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


David George

15th June 2020 at 8:39 pm

Haven’t heard anything about that reprehensible racist (among his multitude of failings) Karl Marx’s books getting banned and burnt.
Perhaps the Marxist BLM haven’t heard his claim that “n…..s are only three fifths human”, or choose to ignore it on the foolish assumption that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
If anything thoroughly deserves to be erased from history it’s the idiotic ravings of Karl Marx.

David George

15th June 2020 at 9:00 pm

A couple of Marx’s thoughts on other races:

Black inferiority, or natural bondage as he referred to it had been “assigned (to Negroes) by Nature. The Negro has strength and power to labour, but the Nature which created the power denied to him either the intellect to govern, or willingness to work.”
Marx wrote to Engels that Tremaux had “proved that the common Negro type is the degenerate form of a much higher one”

David McAdam

15th June 2020 at 7:57 pm

I wonder how these witless ‘protesters’ would react if us Scots demanded they hand over their property as compensation, modest as it would be, for the forced confiscation of our ancestors’ land during the Highland Clearances. Even though the Marquess of Staffordshire who initiated the clearance had provided financial assistance for the displaced, it would be fair game and in keeping with the ‘protesters”, one man guilty nation guilty, criteria. But unlike some people groups stuck in perpetual victim-hood supported by the aforementioned ‘protesters’ that presume to take offence on their behalf, we got over the harrowing episode, and moved on in giant strides.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.