‘Nothing can justify this destruction of people’s lives’

Yoram Lass, former director of Israel’s Health Ministry, on the hysteria around Covid-19.

spiked

Countries across the world have been in lockdown for months in response to the coronavirus pandemic. The costs of the policy are enormous – in terms of life, liberty and the economy. But is it worth it to save lives? Yoram Lass was once the director-general of Israel’s Ministry of Health. Lass is a staunch critic of the lockdown policy adopted in his native Israel and around the world. He has described our response to Covid-19 as a form of hysteria. spiked caught up with him to find out more.

spiked: You have described the global response to coronavirus as hysteria. Can you explain that?

Yoram Lass: It is the first epidemic in history which is accompanied by another epidemic – the virus of the social networks. These new media have brainwashed entire populations. What you get is fear and anxiety, and an inability to look at real data. And therefore you have all the ingredients for monstrous hysteria.

It is what is known in science as positive feedback or a snowball effect. The government is afraid of its constituents. Therefore, it implements draconian measures. The constituents look at the draconian measures and become even more hysterical. They feed each other and the snowball becomes larger and larger until you reach irrational territory. This is nothing more than a flu epidemic if you care to look at the numbers and the data, but people who are in a state of anxiety are blind. If I were making the decisions, I would try to give people the real numbers. And I would never destroy my country.

spiked: What do the numbers tell us, in your view?

Lass: Mortality due to coronavirus is a fake number. Most people are not dying from coronavirus. Those recording deaths simply change the label. If patients died from leukaemia, from metastatic cancer, from cardiovascular disease or from dementia, they put coronavirus. Also, the number of infected people is fake, because it depends on the number of tests. The more tests you do the more infected people you get.

The only real number is the total number of deaths – all causes of death, not just coronavirus. If you look at those numbers, you will see that every winter we get what is called an excess death rate. That is, during the winter more people die compared to the average, due to regular, seasonal flu epidemics, which nobody cares about. If you look at the coronavirus wave on a graph, you will see that it looks like a spike. Coronavirus comes very fast, but it also goes away very fast. The influenza wave is shallow as it takes three months to pass, but coronavirus takes one month. If you count the number of people who die in terms of excess mortality – which is the area under the curve – you will see that during the coronavirus season, we have had an excess mortality which is about 15 per cent larger than the epidemic of regular flu in 2017.

Compared to that rise, the draconian measures are of biblical proportions. Hundreds of millions of people are suffering. In developing countries many will die from starvation. In developed countries many will die from unemployment. Unemployment is mortality. More people will die from the measures than from the virus. And the people who die from the measures are the breadwinners. They are younger. Among the people who die from coronavirus, the median age is often higher than the life expectancy of the population. What has been done is not proportionate. But people are afraid. People are brainwashed. They do not listen to the data. And that includes governments.

spiked: Do the lockdowns have any positive effect on people’s safety?

Lass: Any reasonable expert – that is, anyone but Professor Ferguson from Imperial College who would have locked down everybody when we had swine flu – will tell you that lockdown cannot change the final number of infected people. It can only change the rate of infection. And people argue that by changing the rate of infection and ‘flattening the curve’, we prevented the collapse of hospitals. I have shown you the costs of lockdown, but this was the argument in favour of it. But look at Sweden. No lockdown and no collapse of hospitals. The argument for the lockdown collapses.

spiked: Why have some countries suffered so much more than others from Covid-19?

Lass: For example, you can compare Italy to Israel. In the Middle East, this virus is not really working. There are two reasons. One is that there is a very young population, and the other is that the climate is different. In the latitude of 50 degrees, which is Europe, and 40, which is the north-eastern United States, the virus is much more viable. Italy has the oldest population in the world apart from Japan. Italians are also are heavy smokers and very social people – they keep hugging and kissing. If you look at the numbers, in 2017, 25,000 Italians died from flu complications. Now you have around 30,000 dying from coronavirus. So it is a comparable number. You should not ruin a country for comparable numbers.

spiked: What has it been like in Israel?

Lass: In Israel, we have two layers of fear. The hysteria is similar to the rest of the world. However, we have a prime minister who has been resuscitated by coronavirus by adding another layer of fear. I do not think there is any other prime minister who has spoken about coronavirus in terms of the medieval Black Death, the Holocaust and the end of humanity in this way. Did Boris Johnson mention the Black Death? I do not think so. That is the special situation in Israel.

spiked: How does coronavirus compare to past pandemics?

Lass: If you look at the 1950s, we had the Asian flu. In the 1960s, there was the Hong Kong flu. These were worse than this pandemic. Also, look at the story of swine flu in 2009, which began exactly the same as coronavirus. A new virus originated in Mexico. There was no vaccine so it was very frightening. It spread all over the world. It infected one billion people. A quarter of a million people died. But there was no lockdown, no Ferguson, nothing – people were far more interested in the economic crisis that hit a year before in 2008. They did not have time to give attention to this nonsense.

spiked: Will the pandemic be over soon?

Lass: The virus, like the influenza virus, is saying farewell to western Europe for sure. The same in the Middle East. In the United States, we do not know yet, so we should talk in a month from now. But nothing can justify this destruction of people’s lives. It is unbelievable.

Yoram Lass was talking to Fraser Myers.

Help spiked prick the Covid consensus

So here we are – 15 weeks into Britain’s three-week lockdown. We hope you are all staying sane out there, and that spiked has been of some assistance in that. We have ramped up our output of late, to provide a challenge to the Covid consensus. But we couldn’t have done that without your support. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is completely free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you enjoy our work, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can donate here.Thank you! And stay well.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Comments

Ron S

26th May 2020 at 2:32 pm

This character is an absolute charlatan!
I live in Israel and follow his clownlike appearances in the media.
At first, he claimed the virus will not even get out of China, so there is no need for any safety measures at all. after he insisted that it is not Sever then seasonal flu and so on.
he never gave any explanation to the spike in general mortality rate, where covid19 strike, as it does not sit with his claim of altering the cause of death to COVID 19.

Kemo Sabe

27th May 2020 at 7:15 am

As he pointed out, “safety measures” don’t alter the final number infected.

Temporary spiking of general mortality and mis-recording of deaths as Covid are not mutually exclusive. There is also a documented drop in mortality from other causes in the same timeframe as that spiking in US data, which one would expect from mis-recording.

Seasonal flu can kill up to 650,000 annually; he’s correct that this event is within the same range. No charlatan here, rather someone being clear and honest about the facts.

Shelley Alvarez

29th May 2020 at 2:28 am

If this character is a charlatan, is the PM who talks about the Black Death and imposes a medieval quarantine (imitating the Chinese police state just like the rest of the so called Free World) a sensible man?

Let’s look at the data that the “charlatans” from the “Istituto Superiore di Sanità” of the Italian National Health Service have published here:
https://www.epicentro.iss.it/en/coronavirus/bollettino/Report-COVID-2019_21_may_2020.pdf

“Mean age of patients dying for SARS-CoV-2 infection was 80 years” (31,096 deaths recorded to May 21st 2020). Based on a sample of 3,032 patients dying in-hospital: 59.6% had 3 or more comorbidities, 21.4% had 2; only 4.1 % had none. The diseases are listed as: Ischemic heart disease, Atrial fibrillation, Heart failure, Stroke, Hypertension, Type 2-Diabetes, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Active cancer, Chronic liver disease, Chronic renal failure…

And this is no new info at all: “On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12 per cent of death certificates have shown a direct causality from coronavirus, while 88 per cent of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity – many had two or three,” said Professor Walter Ricciardi, scientific adviser to Italy’s minister of health. (The Telegraph, March 23rd).

So it really seems the world has gone hysterical over this pandemic. It’s a very harmful and dangerous situation.

Doly Garcia

25th May 2020 at 2:02 pm

Israeli operatives have a reputation for lots of things, being truthful sources free of propaganda is not one of them. But let’s leave that aside.

The social media explanation for the reaction of governments doesn’t hold any water. China, the first country that had the virus, had a serious crackdown on social media. It’s also a country that ended up having some of the most restrictive measures. Was it because of social media? Of course not! They had that controlled.

The story about “changing the labels” of what people died from doesn’t hold any water either, because the numbers say that an awful lot more people died than they usually do this time of the year. This is true even in countries with little or no restrictions, like Brazil. So you can’t claim that the lockdowns killed those people.

Sweden, that keeps getting talked about, may not have a hard lockdown, but it certainly has social distancing restrictions and the police will enforce them. So you can say that softer measures are better in your opinion, but you can’t use Sweden to argue against any measures at all.

So, with this information, does this man look like he’s interested in spreading the truth or in confusing propaganda?

Ron S

26th May 2020 at 2:46 pm

well said.
this guy knew “Everything” from day one. and as his predictions have grown further from reality he started making up basic facts to keep face.

Dan Under

29th May 2020 at 10:50 pm

Doly G, hoisting the rainbow swastika gives your game away. As for the hand waving, ‘the numbers say that an awful lot more people died than they usually do this time of the year’ let’s see the comparative data, after the current nonsense masquerading as data is adjusted and corrected for intentional distortion. 15% more than the usual number seen in a ‘flu epidemic (2017) is not ‘an awful lot more’ particularly when the COD is, for the majority, routinely and intentionally confounded by comorbidity, and then attributed to a singular novel virus causation. Lock down has made matters massively far worse and downstream, the sequelae appear socioeconomically devastating. Dr Yoram Lass underscores those points. You may also recall Dr Bruce Aylward of the UN WHO spouting about coming for your children, removing family members from close domiciled lockdown confinement imposed by the State where intrafamily spread was thought rampant. The subject of discussion here is not about the established and effective measures of social distancing, PPE, protection of vulnerable groups, track/tracing & isolation, and widespread random population testing. It is about the murderous devastation and failure of penal-like constraint.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.