Sadiq Khan’s naked hypocrisy

Why is the London mayor throwing money at some underwear ads while banning others?


London mayor Sadiq Khan has awarded £500,000 worth of free advertising on the London Underground to hosiery brand Nubian Skin.

The brand’s ‘A different kind of nude’ campaign was unveiled by the mayor as the winner of a Transport for London competition to promote diversity in advertising. The adverts, to be displayed in prominent positions across the tube network, feature men and women in nude-toned underwear.

Most people are fine seeing men and women in underwear and are unlikely to find anything offensive about the adverts. But Sadiq Khan – notoriously – does not like to see women in underwear in adverts.

One of Khan’s first moves as mayor was to ban Protein World’s ‘beach body ready’ adverts, which featured a fitness model in a bikini.

‘As the father of two teenage girls, I’m extremely concerned about this kind of advertising, which can demean people, particularly women, and make them ashamed of their bodies’, he said at the time.

Much of the feminist backlash to the beach-body adverts (rather ludicrously) presented itself as being about ‘body shaming’, as if the mere presence of a conventionally attractive woman can demean others. Yet Khan’s TfL has also banned adverts featuring partial nudity on entirely prudish grounds.

In 2017, TfL banned an advert for Heist, a tights brand. The ad showed a model leaping into the air. She was wearing only Heist tights and was therefore – horror of horrors – exposing her naked back to unsuspecting commuters.

The advert was branded ‘overly sexualised’ and the tights company was ordered to cover up the offending back.

Censorship is clearly the norm in Sadiq Khan’s London. (And that’s before we even get on to TfL’s ban on junk-food advertising, which was so restrictive that even TfL’s own advertising was censored.)

The grounds for censorship are totally opaque. Most tube users will struggle to divine why one underwear advert is empowering, but others need to be taken down.

Sadiq the censor needs to drop the double standards and the woke puritanism that drive his advertising policy.

Picture by: Mayor of London / Twitter.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Aunty Podes

15th February 2020 at 2:23 am

The ad offends me, horribly! It disturbs me! Some of the apparently naked bodies depicted make a bulge in my shorts – it’s summer here! They raise my blood pressure and pulse rate, even. It is jst not good for a guy of my age to be stirred in this way. Is that the beginnings of a pain in my chest?
Just watch out, Khan, you idiot, and naughty Nubians – if I have a heart attack – AND DIE – my wife will be after you with her entourage of top-grade silks – suing the pants off you all!

John Drewry

15th February 2020 at 12:13 am

The truth is that the topless back is a much more beautiful picture than the covered one. Whilst ‘beautiful’ may be an exaggerated description of advertising, photography can certainly extol beauty. And so much of what we are now discouraged from admiring is beauty.

Hugo van der Meer

14th February 2020 at 11:46 pm

Half a million quid..
What a little cungina he is.

Peter Wilson

14th February 2020 at 8:39 pm

I’m not on Twitter, but surely #SadiqKhanisracist should be trending about now. It’s hard to be more blatant than that

Rick O’Shay

12th February 2020 at 6:15 pm

Who was it that called Khan “The mad mullah of Londonistan”? He was clearly correct.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.