Johnny Depp and the dangers of ‘believe women’

New evidence suggests that Amber Heard was not the innocent victim she claimed to be.

Ella Whelan

Ella Whelan


It’s typical for celebrity marriages to be short-lived and mired in scandal. But the 15-month union between Hollywood stars Johnny Depp and Amber Heard has caused more of a stir than usual because of accusations of domestic violence and abuse.

After filing for divorce in May 2016, Heard was granted a restraining order against Depp. Leaked photos from court documents emerged that seemed to show Heard with a bruised face. A video was also leaked of Depp apparently throwing wine bottles and glasses around a room. More leaked documents revealed that Heard claimed to have been physically and emotionally abused by Depp throughout their relationship. Depp’s lawyers claimed this was merely an attempt to gain an early financial settlement. Eventually, the pair settled out of court, signing non-disclosure agreements to prevent them from discussing the relationship publicly. Heard dropped her restraining order and that seemed to be that.

But that wasn’t the end of it, of course. Two years later, Heard wrote an op-ed for the Washington Post. She talked about how she had ‘felt the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out’. While careful not to name Depp directly, she claimed she ‘had the rare vantage point of seeing, in real time, how institutions protect men accused of abuse’. She argued that her own experience had shown her how important it is to fight for legal change, including the extension of Title IX regulations in universities and the strengthening of domestic-violence laws.

In response to the Post piece, Depp filed a defamation claim against Heard for $50million. He claims that the piece presupposes that he is a domestic abuser and she is a victim. And last week, the Daily Mail published a recording of a conversation between the couple in 2015 that complicates matters further. In it, Heard admits that she was herself violent and abusive towards Depp during their short-lived marriage.

What Heard and Depp did or didn’t do is a matter for them and their lawyers. But the commentary around this case has been extraordinary, and the latest revelations show the dangers of ‘believing the victim’, as we are so often exhorted to do in situations like this. Indeed when Heard filed for divorce in 2016, the media world, which was about to be swallowed by the onset of the #MeToo movement, used this celebrity case to try to teach the rest of us a lesson.

A long Vox column chastised the public for not ‘believing’ Heard, citing a string of unpleasant comments, posted under a gossip column, claiming that Heard was blackmailing Depp. ‘That’s what usually happens when a woman accuses a powerful and beloved man of hurting her’, the column read. Grazia even criticised Depp’s daughter for defending him, insisting that Heard’s ‘voice counts and our insidious, doubting voices do not’.

Meanwhile, the Guardian invoked Charlotte Bronte in an article celebrating Heard’s newfound freedom from her alleged abuser: ‘Reader, she left him.’

But what the Depp-v-Heard case has revealed is not our deep-seated hatred for women who speak out about domestic abuse, but the corrosive effect of contemporary feminism on justice. For feminist campaigners, justice should be for one side only – the accuser. When campaigns like #IBelieveHer and #MeToo insist we automatically believe accusations of sexual abuse or harassment, the principle of innocent until proven guilty is thrown out of the window.

Depp alleges that Heard faked the assault against her. Whether or not that is true, or if the two were in fact attacking one another, this case should give some #MeToo types pause for thought. Relationships are rarely black and white, especially when they break down. What’s more, the push to believe all women creates an unrealistic picture of women as fragile, angelic and incapable of being wrong. This denies an important truth – that we women can be just as rough, tough and ugly as men.

If we want better justice for women and men, we should not jump to conclusions before all the facts are available.

Ella Whelan is a spiked columnist and the author of What Women Want: Fun, Freedom and an End to Feminism.

Picture by: Getty.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


American Reader

19th February 2020 at 7:57 pm

Amber Heard sucked the life out of Johnny Depp! Look at him before her, and after. And look at her before him, and after! How can people not see the visual difference? Are they blind?

Lauder Eric

17th February 2020 at 1:19 am

Looks like Ella is in damage control mode.

I’m not convinced: Amber Heard is a liar and should be jailed, the situation is absoutely black and white.

martin dufresne

8th February 2020 at 6:09 am

“…Depp alleges that Heard faked the assault against her. Whether or not that is true, or if the two were in fact attacking one another, this case should give some #MeToo types pause for thought…”

Logics doesn’t seem to be the author’s forte. “#MeToo types” have a much more sophisticated analysis than what she credits them with and their focus is on slap-dash attempts to discredit women… such as hers.

steve moxon

8th February 2020 at 5:47 pm


Claire D

9th February 2020 at 8:27 am

#MeToo was a moral panic in response to the TV serialisation of The Handmaid’s Tale. Hysteria swept across the US and the UK, it even reached the House of Commons (The President’s Club scandal and Jess Philip’s performance in particular).
So the idea that “#MeToo types” are capable of rational thought is highly unlikely.

Cedar Grove

7th February 2020 at 10:45 pm

It’s irrational and unfair to “believe” one party to a dispute before an alleged offence has been investigated.

But I think this policy was intended to counterbalance the recorded bias in believing men and thus dismissing women without a hearing.

What we should do is investigate as if each of the two people involved were accepted as truthful: with effort, we can usually conclude with accuracy whether either or both are lying.

steve moxon

8th February 2020 at 5:50 pm

What?! The default, which is deep in all of us, is to believe the woman and regard the man as a scumbag. And this hopelessly biases any examination of a “one person’s word against another’s” scenario, which usually is absent clear evidence.

Michael Lynch

7th February 2020 at 11:02 am

This is merely a story about another gold digger who has used every trick in the book to get her way including modern feminist values. I’m sick to the back teeth of hearing these rich Hollywood types bleat on about victimhood.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.