Why Labour’s National Education Service is a bad idea

Education is about so much more than employability.

Joe Nutt

Share
Topics Politics UK

The Labour Party is promising to create a cradle-to-grave ‘National Education Service’ (NES) modelled on the apparently unimpeachable NHS that would ‘provide free education for everyone throughout their lives’. Labour politicians have never been slow to exploit the public’s affection for our health service. But is there really any educational value in these plans?

Some years ago, I found myself sitting in A&E on a hot summer’s day close enough to reception to hear everything each newcomer said to the staff. The first to grip my attention was a family with a child aged about six or seven who had fallen over and grazed his knee. It was a simple graze that most parents would have cleaned up with hot water and soap, before covering it with a plaster. Two nurses exchanged looks and the child was booked in to see someone. After that, a woman explained to the receptionist that she’d been stung by a bee at a barbecue. When asked if she was allergic to bee stings she said no, but she too was booked in by the nursing staff and took a seat in an already hot and crowded waiting room. This, too, would be easily fixable with a visit to the chemist or a corner shop.

There is no doubt that the NHS provides a service we all value and admire, but in many ways, over decades, it has been the victim of its own success. You need only look at figures on obesity or visit A&E late on a Saturday night in any major city to start wondering whether the NHS might have played a role in shifting people’s sense of responsibility away from themselves and their families to the state. Even the most minor mental-health concerns – usually just a reflection of the psychological reality of being a homo sapiens in the 21st century ̵ are treated by the NHS.

Imagine a National Education Service 70 years on. Just as the NHS is now overused and has extended its purpose beyond recognition, it is not hard to see how an NES could be equally overloaded once people have got the message that the state is there to educate you throughout your life. There will also be no shortage of people eager to rethink that opportunity for their own political purposes. It surely won’t be long before problematic people find themselves being advised or even required to be ‘re-educated’.

But we don’t need to look that far ahead to see the shortcomings. The lifelong learning that the Labour manifesto envisages is a ‘free lifelong entitlement’ to training up to ‘Level 3’ and six years training at ‘Levels 4-6’ – from the equivalent of school-level to undergraduate level. From the off, it is clear that the NES elides education and training – two very different things. Education is about expanding minds, whereas training has a more rigid, tick-box character. Labour’s proposal assumes that further education and lifelong learning is entirely a matter of employability – a series of golden (or at least bronze) tickets to a better future. Take a course and earn more money. This is Legoland economics.

Jeremy Corbyn imagines his NES as an ‘escalator that travels with us upwards through our lives’. But reducing education in the public’s mind to such a utilitarian purpose would entrench the idea that the individual is merely a cog in a bigger, more important wheel – a national asset to be deployed by more ‘escalated’ minds.

The small print makes clear that the NES is little more than a state-run training scheme, churning out the kind of people politicians think the country needs. We can probably forget apparently frivolous things like freedom of choice or passion for a subject – the motives that have always fuelled people to become well-educated.

If what you care about is individual freedom and genuine education – including the freedom to educate yourself at any point in your life about anything you choose – then the last thing you need to do is step on to a state-run escalator.

Joe Nutt is the author of several books about the poetry of Donne, Milton and Shakespeare. His new book, The Point of Poetry, is published by Unbound.

Picture by: Getty.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Comments

kejadi kejadi

29th November 2019 at 5:17 pm

I am making $125 per hour working online on my laptop among my family. I continue doing work in my room talking to them. Its too easy to complete it no experience or skill required. You just need internet and PC/laptop. Hurry up and join the link………..golden.jobs67.com

Keith Lloyd

27th November 2019 at 9:20 pm

As a former Primary Education Headmaster I despair at what the (mainly Labourite) teachers are dishing out into young brains. The thought of a whole lifetime of this PC inculcation appals me. I am, though, heartened a little by the comments in the above posts.

Ven Oods

27th November 2019 at 12:39 pm

“”Why Labour’s National Education Service is a bad idea”
Because it’s Labour’s?

Jim Lawrie

27th November 2019 at 11:57 am

The State and its apparatchiks will not give people education and training vouchers to spend where they choose because that means control of what is provided and contracts to do so leave that cabal orf teacher, lecturers and training providers.

fret slider

27th November 2019 at 10:42 am

Schools – given their ever expanding remit – are Social Engineering Factories.

Education is a thing of the past now….

“The extra carbon dioxide is causing an enhanced greenhouse effect, greater than would happen naturally. There is a correlation between the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration, and temperature change. As the concentration of carbon dioxide has increased, the global average temperature has generally increased too.” https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zwdsjty/revision/6

This is completely scientifically false http://www.biocab.org/Geological_Timescale.jpg

It’s all about the social engineering and indoctrination now

William Murphy

27th November 2019 at 8:55 am

Further thought to my post on the library system as a National Education Service. We also have an International Education Service called the Internet which has educational material in mindbending quantities. If you cannot afford a cheap smartphone, you can use Internet access at your local library. Now that really is educational, but in a way that useless politicians will not appreciate. It makes it easier to work out when they are talking shite.

William Murphy

27th November 2019 at 8:50 am

We have had a National Education Service for decades. It is called the public library. It is a measure of how invisible this incredible service is that people take it for granted, like the sunshine. It existed in the USA and UK long before the NHS or welfare state was invented. How many people have improved their vocational or cultural prospects by diligent study at a library without being supervised by a state functionary?

It ought to be called the International Education Service because so many countries have libraries and, in principle, you can get books from any library via the interlibrary loan system.

Steve Gray

27th November 2019 at 8:09 am

‘It surely won’t be long before problematic people find themselves being advised or even required to be ‘re-educated’

There is already a prototypical version of this, which can be found in the state’s dealings with unemployed people.

For example, skilled workers from economic sectors in recession or collapse, such as construction or manufacturing, are routinely told that ‘the world has changed’ and are laid into, over their sense of entitlement to a skilled worker’s wage and prospects.

The mantra is ‘That is gone forever and you must accept that your attempt to better yourself and become more prosperous has ended in failure. Your future lies in zero-hours hand-to-mouth odd-jobbing.’

Dominic Straiton

27th November 2019 at 7:49 am

Being taught what to think by an imbecile is an entirely redundant concept. I would’t send any child of mine anywhere near the British education establishment. If in later life you cannot educate yourself you have had a terrible education thanks to the British education establishment.

NEIL DATSON

27th November 2019 at 6:51 am

Well, if it restricted itself to inculcate the absolute basics of self-help (what to do when your child grazes his or her knee, what to do when you’re stung by a bee being good examples) there might just be some small merit in it. More likely its primary consequence would be to encourage the dependency culture.

fret slider

27th November 2019 at 10:48 am

“” what to do when your child grazes his or her knee..””

These days the question is: Who do I sue…

Lloyd Reid

27th November 2019 at 4:45 am

Won’t be individual education. Would be mass brainwashing to keep the population ignorant and docile.

Philip Humphrey

27th November 2019 at 7:41 am

That is a problem for the leftists. The indoctrination starts to wear off after people leave fulltime education and discover the real world. No doubt lifelong education would have an element of PC and “wokeness” refresher, trading, although personally I doubt whether it would be effective.

Jim Lawrie

27th November 2019 at 12:22 pm

Given how much of the current resources are given over to the doctrine of political correctness, I tend to agree with you. But as always with leftists, the failure is not with the theory, but rather, is down to not enough of a bombardment, so batter it in harder, deeper, longer … They are impervious to the law of diminishing returns.

2 generations on and youngsters are as fed up with it as are their counterparts in Iran, totally monged by their education system based on the achievements, the glory and the sanctity of The Islamic Revolution.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.