Hong Kong: the brutal crackdown on democracy

Beijing and the Hong Kong government have nothing to offer but violence.

Martin Barraclough

Topics Politics World

The absence of any political imagination or willingness to compromise means that the government of Hong Kong has nothing to offer its population except more violence. The protesters are demanding that the autonomy of Hong Kong and universal suffrage – as apparently promised under Hong Kong’s Basic Law – be respected. But Beijing has made it abundantly clear that it has no intention of meeting these demands.

Today, Beijing reduced the Hong Kong authorities’ room for manoeuvre even further. After the high court overturned a government ban on the wearing of face masks at demonstrations, Beijing declared that Hong Kong’s courts have no right to decide whether any Hong Kong law is constitutional or not.
Goodbye ‘One Country, Two Systems’. With nothing in the political armoury, the Hong Kong government is now arming its police force with machine guns, tear gas, water cannons and a device that emits such high-volume sounds it can cause nausea or even shatter eardrums. Police in recent days have fired live rounds. At the time of writing, police are patrolling Central, the central business district, carrying M16 machine guns. Since the pro-democracy protests began, they have fired off thousands of rounds of tear gas, rubber bullets and bean bags.

They have now added mass, apparently random arrests to their intimidation tactics. Volunteer medics leaving the three-day siege at Hong Kong Polytechnic University (PolyU) have been detained alongside protesters. One student has died of head injuries after falling amid clashes with the police, though the exact chain of events and who is responsible is still unclear. Protesters have also accused the police of beatings, torture and even rape in custody. Meanwhile, at least in the world of social media, some protesters are believed to have been ‘disappeared’.

What has quite often disappeared are any identifying marks on police uniforms, making it impossible to pursue claims of abuse against individual officers. Adding to the intimidatory atmosphere are the occasional appearances of gangs of white-shirted thugs, probably triads, beating up suspected activists.

In recent weeks, the police have shown themselves to have no reluctance in arresting, detaining and intimidating secondary-school children and even elderly women. At the recent siege of Hong Kong PolyU, a group of 65 headteachers and a retired senior politician, Jasper Tsang, had to negotiate with the police to secure the safe release and passage of hundreds of secondary-school-age children from the campus.

Rather than subduing the protests, police violence and intimidation have caused the violence to escalate. Protesters have responded with makeshift weapons that include catapults, Molotov cocktails, spiked traps on roads, and crossbows. Photographs sent to CNN show cooking gas canisters turned into nail bombs. Horrifically, one man who remonstrated with protesters was set on fire. A 70-year-old man was hit on the head by a brick and died, though it’s unclear if he was hit by pro- or anti-democracy protesters. The protesters have hit one police officer in the leg with an arrow and have disabled one of the police water cannon trucks with a row of spikes laid out across a road.

Public support for the pro-democracy protesters may have lessened because of the increased violence and massive disruption. Though the most high-profile stand-off between protesters and police took place at PolyU, the demonstrations are by no means confined to student radicals. The students of PolyU only managed to hold out against the police for as long as they did because members of the public formed supply chains to send in food and medical supplies. Protests were also organised in other districts in attempts to lure the police away from the university siege. What’s more, the police now regularly patrol the central business district because every lunch hour, office workers come out and protest against their brutality. Those protests have been occurring in other spots across Hong Kong, too.

Many members of the public are undoubtedly put off by the protesters’ increasing use of violence. But widely circulated videos of the police driving vans at high speed and a motorbike towards crowds tend to reinforce dislike and distrust of the police rather than the protesters.

An optimist might argue that the way ahead for the Hong Kong government is to make sure that local elections – currently slated for Sunday – go ahead as planned. But there is a serious possibility they will be delayed. Usually, these elections are about little more than who empties the bins, meaning low turnout is common. But this time, the elections have been widely anticipated as a chance to give the authorities an electoral slap in the face.

A further provocation could be the planned reintroduction of Article 23 – a national security law prohibiting treason, secession, sedition and subversion, which is widely seen as a thinly veiled attack on Hong Kong’s democratic aspirations. In 2003, attempts to implement Article 23 provoked 500,000 people to march, leading to its withdrawal.

Both a delay to elections and the implementation of Article 23 are likely to cause further unrest. If the past few months have proven anything, it is that Hong Kong’s elites will always take the move most likely to fan the flames. It will be difficult for the authorities to end the demonstrations without making concessions. But Beijing is not in the mood to compromise.

Martin Barraclough is a writer based in Hong Kong.

Picture by: Getty.

Let’s cancel cancel culture

Free speech is under attack from all sides – from illiberal laws, from a stifling climate of conformity, and from a powerful, prevailing fear of being outed as a heretic online, in the workplace, or even among friends, for uttering a dissenting thought. This is why we at spiked are stepping up our fight for speech, expanding our output and remaking the case for this most foundational liberty. But to do that we need your help. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you want to support us, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can find out more and sign up here. Thank you! And keep speaking freely.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


alan smithee

19th November 2019 at 3:02 pm

Meanwhile in Bolivia….The message here is that if you are well heeled the US will support you , if not you will be shot dead as in Bolivia this week.

Draziwd Nim

19th November 2019 at 12:06 pm

The moment protesters donned masks and started lobbing Molotov cocktails, beating up people who disagreed with them, producing improvised nail bombs and shooting potentially lethal arrows at the police, they moved beyond legitimate protest into active insurrection that was only ever going to invite greater violence from the police. The protesters needed to maintain the moral and political high ground. By adopting morally indefensible tactics, they signally failed to do this. And worse, they have made it infinitely easier – from a PR and political point of view – for the state to resort to fully weaponised repression. The protestors have failed to understand that what goes down without challenge in Portland, Oregon will eventually – and I think inevitably – be met with deadly force in the streets of Hong Kong. And the people acting as their cheerleaders will bear at least some responsibility for that terrible outcome.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.