‘Sikhs have been forgotten in the hate-crime debate’

Hardeep Singh on how Sikhs have been caught in the crossfire of post-9/11 hate.

spiked

Share
Topics Books Politics UK

Since 9/11, Sikhs in the West have been attacked, and in some cases killed, by violent racists. They have effectively been caught in the crossfire of anti-Muslim sentiment. Hardeep Singh, deputy director of the Network of Sikh Organisations, says this is one of the great overlooked parts of the hate-crime discussion. He sat down with spiked to talk about Racialisation, Islamophobia and Mistaken Identity: The Sikh Experience, a new book he has co-authored with Jagbir Jhutti-Johal.

spiked: What was your motivation for writing this book?

Hardeep Singh: I guess it’s a few things. I know a lot of people who have faced the reverberations of the post-9/11 environment. I had that firsthand experience of suffering a backlash, such as people mocking you, calling you ‘bin Laden’. I remember after the Boston bombings I was just walking in town wearing my rucksack, and three guys turned round and said ‘Don’t press the button!’.

But a lot of people in the British Sikh community had suffered serious consequences. And in America – as we explore in the book – it was far worse: there were revenge attacks where people were murdered. So the motivation for writing the book came from my personal experience, but also the broader experience of people in the Sikh community both here and in America.

spiked: What changed with 9/11?

Singh: Those images that were being transmitted across Fox News, of Osama bin Laden and his deputy with their turbans and flowing beards, were seared into the American consciousness. These were the guys that were responsible for the events. And therefore, when people saw someone with a turban and a beard, they associated those religious symbols and that image with the enemy. And the reality is, both in America and the UK, the majority of people who wear turbans and have long beards are Sikhs.

The term that we’ve used in the book is ‘mistaken identity’. This had real and serious consequences for Sikhs worldwide. But it has not really been recognised so far in government policy in the UK. So going back to your previous question, that was another reason why we felt it was important to highlight what has happened, and highlight where we think things need to change. We think that parity for people of all faiths and none should be where the policy should be.

spiked: Isn’t hate crime an unwieldy concept to begin with?

Singh: Yes, this concept of hate crime is, in some ways, problematic, because when someone burgles or robs someone it is not exactly a ‘love crime’. That’s the first thing. There are other people who face prejudice, like people with ginger hair and people who are elderly. People with glasses at school will get bullied. Difference motivates prejudice, and that could be seen to be the case across the board.

But our point is that the Sikh community, in terms of government policy and the broader discussion of hate crime, has been marginalised. For the book we did an audit of press reports about hate crime. In the first period we looked at — 2014 to 2015 — Sikhs weren’t mentioned at all. I think there was a vague reference to an incident in 2015, when there was an attempted beheading of a Sikh dentist in Wales by a guy who was influenced by National Action and Jihadi John. (It was a kind of revenge attack for Lee Rigby.) The media just referred to him as a young Asian dentist. So that just shows that even when Sikhs have suffered, they remain invisible.

spiked: Has it not been to the benefit of Sikhs that they are not often considered a ‘victim group’?

Singh: That’s an interesting point. There are a few things to this. When it comes to policy, lobbying, the squeaky wheel gets the oil. When the government’s plan for tackling hate crime, Action Against Hate, was published in 2016, Sikhs were barely even mentioned.

But I think the other aspect to this is about Sikh teaching. Even when we had a price on our heads under various tyrants in history, when a Sikh would meet another Sikh they’d say they are in high spirits to one another. Rather than bemoaning their predicament and the situation they were in, they would always be upbeat and optimistic. So I think it stems from a doctrinal attitude that we can trace back to our forefathers.

Sikhs have also integrated very well in Britain, and the Sikh community is often talked about in that context. In terms of the honours system, increasingly a lot of people within the community are being recognised for their contribution. And I think it boils down to values. Sikh values promote equality for women, equality for all. There’s a belief that we’re all part of one big family. The 10th Guru’s edict is quite unequivocal: recognise the human race as one. And these teachings, they are hand-in-glove with Western liberal democracy.

But regardless, what we need is a fairer approach to this particular area, and that applies to everyone. At the moment, as we’ve demonstrated in the book, the focus is very narrow, mainly on the Jewish and the Muslim communities. And understandably so. But that shouldn’t be at the expense of anyone else.

Hardeep Singh was talking to Fraser Myers.

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.

Comments

Jason Daves

3rd November 2019 at 11:30 pm

The only “hate crime” debate I know of is why there are so many fake “hate crimes” that end up being minorities trying to frame Whites. With all this talk of “racists” and “nazies” in MSM you’d think you’d occasionally see a “racist” or “Nazi”. I never have; maybe they’re like Bigfoot.

Willie Penwright

19th October 2019 at 10:43 am

If you move to a country and refuse to integrate of course you will be treated differently. It’s what you want when you wear silly hats and attend a club/organisation/religion whose traditions and values are anathema to the natives.
When you rear your children in the bizarre ‘beliefs’ of your club and tell them they are different, and dress them differetly etc, it would be foolish to expect that you will be treated the same as the natives.
The multiplicity of religions, cults and sub-cults in Britain, demanding equality while refusing to integrate, is the problem.
There should be no immigration without integration.

This post is awaiting ‘moderation’.

Danny Rees

19th October 2019 at 3:11 pm

Except it was moderated and approved and now we can see it and laugh at how stupid it is.

Willie Penwright

19th October 2019 at 4:13 pm

Easily amused. I don’t suppose you could refute it.

jessica christon

25th October 2019 at 2:03 pm

“There should be no immigration without integration.”

I agree, but we have a back end approach to it and that’s the problem. While virtue signallers berated us for our initial offer to take ‘only’ 5,000 Syrian refugees from a UN camp a few years ago, Japan took in about 15 of them. But those who they took weren’t just anyone; they were business people who were secular and well educated, already had close connections with Japan and spoke Japanese, etc.

This is how it should be done in my view; the readiness to integrate of any would be immigrant should be seriously vetted at the up front so that they hit the ground running like the Ugandan Asians did. Our back end approach doesn’t work because there isn’t much practical that can be done about it once they’re already here if they don’t want to know.

Ven Oods

18th October 2019 at 11:36 pm

I don’t remember being previously aware of this problem, which probably only underlines Singh’s point.

m Gould

18th October 2019 at 7:24 pm

Back in the late 60’s in the army we had a sikh. He was the privileged one. No one wanted him their troop. He was unreliable and played on his religion.
If you go into any minority religious enclave other than Christian you will have problems.
I would like to see them gone along with the rest of the third world multiculturalism because it does not work.

Amin Readh

25th October 2019 at 10:24 pm

Tough tits. We are not just here to stay but to replace you. Get used to it.

Rob Maloney

18th October 2019 at 5:28 pm

While I find anti- acts of action or speech against any people deplorable, we must distinguish between genuine hate and lunkheaded boorishness. In NJ USA a year ago, there was a fuss over a perhaps disrespectful ref to NJ state atty. gen. by radio hosts on a call-in program. These were not news professionals; just on-air personalities. Here is the story. they were “reeducated.” But I don’t think their action was “hate” just perhaps “bad taste.” Calling everything hate just devalues the term. Here is the story: https://www.foxnews.com/us/longtime-radio-hosts-off-air-after-calling-new-jersey-attorney-general-by-abhorrent-and-xenophobic-nickname

Mark Lambert

18th October 2019 at 12:12 pm

A sort of linked point I suppose……

On a radio show some months ago, a caller was talking of the problems of Muslim integration, quoting a few writers and reports etc. The radio host stopped him and came out with an anecdote. He said:

“The other day I saw a video of a Sikh wedding and they were singing ‘football’s coming home’. If that is not integration, I don’t know what is”.

There was a slight pause, but obviously the caller said, “I wasn’t talking about Sikhs………”

A Game

18th October 2019 at 6:43 am

I suppose muslims and jews get the most attention because one group won’t stop trying to kill the other.
But very good interview and excellent premise of a book. We are in a society of extreme social control… how on earth have the “good people” managed to overlook this marginalisation? Another example of their insincerity. They promote themselves as not needing the wheel to squeak before it gets some oil. Oh dear. Turns out they are liars.
The only way for the Sikh members to achieve their goals is to help pull down the victim culture of identity politics. For integrating, you’ve been overlooked, despite taking your unfair burden of backlash. Its outrageous to expect successful people in society to have to start playing hurt and gormless just to be included in all the rhetoric.
Perhaps a higher profile fought for in the media, etc, will help your flock get a better go.

Andrew Best

18th October 2019 at 6:15 am

Worked with a few sikhs over the years, always in my experience good people.
Saw a police officer once with a turban and the badge on it and I suppose if it is designed to stop a sword blow it will stop a bottle or a brick
Shame they get targeted by idiots who have no idea about history or other cultures

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.