‘Sikhs have been forgotten in the hate-crime debate’

Hardeep Singh on how Sikhs have been caught in the crossfire of post-9/11 hate.


Topics Books Politics UK

Since 9/11, Sikhs in the West have been attacked, and in some cases killed, by violent racists. They have effectively been caught in the crossfire of anti-Muslim sentiment. Hardeep Singh, deputy director of the Network of Sikh Organisations, says this is one of the great overlooked parts of the hate-crime discussion. He sat down with spiked to talk about Racialisation, Islamophobia and Mistaken Identity: The Sikh Experience, a new book he has co-authored with Jagbir Jhutti-Johal.

spiked: What was your motivation for writing this book?

Hardeep Singh: I guess it’s a few things. I know a lot of people who have faced the reverberations of the post-9/11 environment. I had that firsthand experience of suffering a backlash, such as people mocking you, calling you ‘bin Laden’. I remember after the Boston bombings I was just walking in town wearing my rucksack, and three guys turned round and said ‘Don’t press the button!’.

But a lot of people in the British Sikh community had suffered serious consequences. And in America – as we explore in the book – it was far worse: there were revenge attacks where people were murdered. So the motivation for writing the book came from my personal experience, but also the broader experience of people in the Sikh community both here and in America.

spiked: What changed with 9/11?

Singh: Those images that were being transmitted across Fox News, of Osama bin Laden and his deputy with their turbans and flowing beards, were seared into the American consciousness. These were the guys that were responsible for the events. And therefore, when people saw someone with a turban and a beard, they associated those religious symbols and that image with the enemy. And the reality is, both in America and the UK, the majority of people who wear turbans and have long beards are Sikhs.

The term that we’ve used in the book is ‘mistaken identity’. This had real and serious consequences for Sikhs worldwide. But it has not really been recognised so far in government policy in the UK. So going back to your previous question, that was another reason why we felt it was important to highlight what has happened, and highlight where we think things need to change. We think that parity for people of all faiths and none should be where the policy should be.

spiked: Isn’t hate crime an unwieldy concept to begin with?

Singh: Yes, this concept of hate crime is, in some ways, problematic, because when someone burgles or robs someone it is not exactly a ‘love crime’. That’s the first thing. There are other people who face prejudice, like people with ginger hair and people who are elderly. People with glasses at school will get bullied. Difference motivates prejudice, and that could be seen to be the case across the board.

But our point is that the Sikh community, in terms of government policy and the broader discussion of hate crime, has been marginalised. For the book we did an audit of press reports about hate crime. In the first period we looked at — 2014 to 2015 — Sikhs weren’t mentioned at all. I think there was a vague reference to an incident in 2015, when there was an attempted beheading of a Sikh dentist in Wales by a guy who was influenced by National Action and Jihadi John. (It was a kind of revenge attack for Lee Rigby.) The media just referred to him as a young Asian dentist. So that just shows that even when Sikhs have suffered, they remain invisible.

spiked: Has it not been to the benefit of Sikhs that they are not often considered a ‘victim group’?

Singh: That’s an interesting point. There are a few things to this. When it comes to policy, lobbying, the squeaky wheel gets the oil. When the government’s plan for tackling hate crime, Action Against Hate, was published in 2016, Sikhs were barely even mentioned.

But I think the other aspect to this is about Sikh teaching. Even when we had a price on our heads under various tyrants in history, when a Sikh would meet another Sikh they’d say they are in high spirits to one another. Rather than bemoaning their predicament and the situation they were in, they would always be upbeat and optimistic. So I think it stems from a doctrinal attitude that we can trace back to our forefathers.

Sikhs have also integrated very well in Britain, and the Sikh community is often talked about in that context. In terms of the honours system, increasingly a lot of people within the community are being recognised for their contribution. And I think it boils down to values. Sikh values promote equality for women, equality for all. There’s a belief that we’re all part of one big family. The 10th Guru’s edict is quite unequivocal: recognise the human race as one. And these teachings, they are hand-in-glove with Western liberal democracy.

But regardless, what we need is a fairer approach to this particular area, and that applies to everyone. At the moment, as we’ve demonstrated in the book, the focus is very narrow, mainly on the Jewish and the Muslim communities. And understandably so. But that shouldn’t be at the expense of anyone else.

Hardeep Singh was talking to Fraser Myers.

Let’s cancel cancel culture

Free speech is under attack from all sides – from illiberal laws, from a stifling climate of conformity, and from a powerful, prevailing fear of being outed as a heretic online, in the workplace, or even among friends, for uttering a dissenting thought. This is why we at spiked are stepping up our fight for speech, expanding our output and remaking the case for this most foundational liberty. But to do that we need your help. spiked – unlike so many things these days – is free. We rely on our loyal readers to fund our journalism. So if you want to support us, please do consider becoming a regular donor. Even £5 per month can be a huge help. You can find out more and sign up here. Thank you! And keep speaking freely.

Donate now

To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.


Jason Daves

3rd November 2019 at 11:30 pm

The only “hate crime” debate I know of is why there are so many fake “hate crimes” that end up being minorities trying to frame Whites. With all this talk of “racists” and “nazies” in MSM you’d think you’d occasionally see a “racist” or “Nazi”. I never have; maybe they’re like Bigfoot.

Willie Penwright

19th October 2019 at 10:43 am

If you move to a country and refuse to integrate of course you will be treated differently. It’s what you want when you wear silly hats and attend a club/organisation/religion whose traditions and values are anathema to the natives.
When you rear your children in the bizarre ‘beliefs’ of your club and tell them they are different, and dress them differetly etc, it would be foolish to expect that you will be treated the same as the natives.
The multiplicity of religions, cults and sub-cults in Britain, demanding equality while refusing to integrate, is the problem.
There should be no immigration without integration.

This post is awaiting ‘moderation’.

Danny Rees

19th October 2019 at 3:11 pm

Except it was moderated and approved and now we can see it and laugh at how stupid it is.

Willie Penwright

19th October 2019 at 4:13 pm

Easily amused. I don’t suppose you could refute it.

jessica christon

25th October 2019 at 2:03 pm

“There should be no immigration without integration.”

I agree, but we have a back end approach to it and that’s the problem. While virtue signallers berated us for our initial offer to take ‘only’ 5,000 Syrian refugees from a UN camp a few years ago, Japan took in about 15 of them. But those who they took weren’t just anyone; they were business people who were secular and well educated, already had close connections with Japan and spoke Japanese, etc.

This is how it should be done in my view; the readiness to integrate of any would be immigrant should be seriously vetted at the up front so that they hit the ground running like the Ugandan Asians did. Our back end approach doesn’t work because there isn’t much practical that can be done about it once they’re already here if they don’t want to know.

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to comment. Log in or Register now.