Separate currency? Why separate Scotland at all, Mr Salmond?
Want to read spiked ad-free? Become a spiked supporter.
The question of whether Scotland would be allowed to use the British pound if it became independent after this autumn’s referendum has become a political hot potato in the past week or two. Leading members of the three main parties in Westminster – most notably the chancellor of the exchequer, George Osborne – have all indicated that Scotland would not be welcome in a currency union with the rest of the UK should Scots vote for independence. The government of the UK central bank, the Bank of England, has also suggested there may be serious practical difficulties involved.
Today, the Scottish National Party leader and Scotland’s first minister, Alex Salmond, blazed back at the idea of Scotland being refused access to the pound and a say in currency policy. ‘I am publishing today an estimate of the transactions cost [Osborne] would potentially impose on businesses in the rest of the UK. They run to many hundreds of millions of pounds. My submission is that this charge – let us call it the George Tax – would be impossible to sell to English business.’
Indeed. It would be a problem – though hardly a huge one – for businesses trading across the border to have to handle different currencies. Just like it is for such businesses to have to handle different tax rates and laws. Which raises the question: why are we making things so difficult already? Scotland has a different legal system to the rest of the UK and has the power to vary tax rates already. Surely if we wanted to make life easier for people on both sides of the border, we should get rid of such barriers altogether?
Rather than demanding independence, the logic of Salmond’s argument is to sweep away the last vestiges of difference between Scotland and the rest of the UK, so that the constitutional arrangements properly reflect what has happened in the 300 years since the Act of Union: that the UK is one country inhabited by one people. Forget independence – let’s scrap devolution.
Rob Lyons is associate editor at spiked.
Help us hit our 1% target
spiked is funded by you. It’s your generosity that keeps us going and growing.
Only 0.1% of our regular readers currently donate to spiked. If you are one of the 99.9% who appreciates what we do, but hasn’t given just yet, please consider making a donation today.
If just 1% of our loyal readers donated regularly, it would be transformative for us, allowing us to vastly expand our team and coverage.
Plus, if you donate £5 a month or £50 a year, you can join and enjoy:
–Ad-free reading
–Exclusive bonus content
–Regular events
–Access to our comments section
The most impactful way to support spiked’s journalism is by registering as a supporter and making a monthly contribution. Thank you.
Comments
Want to join the conversation?
Only spiked supporters and patrons, who donate regularly to us, can comment on our articles.