Microsoft versus the Malthusians
It does often seem as if the planet is overpopulated… by Malthusians. It often seems as if hardly a day goes by without some public figure declaring that the human population needs to be curbed.
At Davos last month, environmental campaigner Al Gore once again called for the imposition of ‘fertility management’ in Africa. The unashamedly Malthusian campaign group, Population Matters (PM), spoke out in favour of cutting benefits for families who had more than two children because ‘the single biggest thing you can do for the planet is to have a smaller family’. And PM patron David Attenborough continues to insist, in interview after interview, that fecund human beings are a ‘plague upon the Earth’.
The optimism in the most recent annual letter from Bill and Melinda Gates, then, comes as a breath of fresh air. In Three myths that block progress for the poor, the Gates celebrate human potential and do not pull their punches when it comes to Malthusian misanthropists (they also criticise the idea that ‘Foreign aid is a big waste’ but, in this instance, two out of three ain’t bad).
‘By almost any measure’, their letter begins, ‘the world is better than it has ever been. People are living longer, healthier lives. Extreme poverty rates have been cut in half in the past 25 years. Child mortality is plunging.’
And yet, the Gateses assert, ‘at international conferences and at social gatherings’ they repeatedly hear from politicians and CEOs that things are getting worse. ‘[This reflects] a dim view of the future, one that says the world isn’t improving but staying poor and sick, and getting overcrowded.’
The Gateses lay out the opposite case: ‘[T]he world is getting better, and […] in two decades it will be better still… billions of people will have been lifted out of extreme poverty.’ They see taking on Malthusian myths as a necessary part of the fight against the Mathusian fetters on progress. As Melinda Gates writes: ‘Anxiety about the size of the world population has a dangerous tendency to override concern for the human beings who make up that population… Human beings are not machines. We don’t reproduce mindlessly. We make decisions based on the circumstances we face.’
Take that David Attenborough! He seems to have convinced himself that humans have little more control over whether or not they choose to reproduce than bonking bunny rabbits in a BBC documentary.
The expansion of the human population should be celebrated. As the Gateses put it: ‘As more people are educated, they will contribute to solving [the world’s] problems.’ Likewise, any reduction in the burgeoning population of Malthusians telling us we should all have fewer kids should be warmly welcomed.
Patrick Hayes is a columnist for spiked.
To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.
Want to join the conversation?
Only spiked supporters, who donate regularly to us, can comment on our articles.