Google: a company of contradictions
Ahead of this week’s live spiked debate, David Crow of City AM offers his thoughts on Google’s current predicament.
In the run-up to the live spiked debate ‘Has Google got too big?’, taking place in central London on Thursday 18 March, we have been publishing a series of articles on Google. Here, David Crow of London-based financial newspaper City AM ponders what lies ahead for ‘a fantastic company’.
Google is a company of contradictions. It claims to be open, but guards its secrets fiercely. It presents itself as a green company, but owns the world’s largest cluster of computers, using huge amounts of power to keep them cool. It is a quintessentially modern company that is run like a feudal kingdom. Although ‘don’t be evil’ is the search giant’s unofficial motto, many of its competitors see it as the devil incarnate.
Despite these incongruities – or maybe even because of them – Google is a force to be reckoned with. By far the biggest and the best player in search, it has built a huge online advertising empire that dwarfs rivals. For that reason, it was only a matter of time before regulators started sniffing around.
Nor will concerns over privacy disappear. Google has proven itself to be remarkably good at protecting customer data, but that isn’t enough. The risk is not Google itself, but the fact that so much of our information is now stored centrally on the web giant’s servers, rather than scattered on our own individual hard disks. That information is at risk of abuse, not by Google itself, but by rogue governments and authoritarians, as the firm found out in China.
The debate around Google often paints it as an unassailable rival that needs its wings clipped, but those that support such a position miss the point. Google does have heavyweight competitors, and often struggles to land blows on them. In social networking, it has made little headway against the likes of Facebook and Twitter, while it is neck-and-neck with Apple in the race to dominate the new generation of mobile phones.
Google stands at a crossroads. It is a fantastic company – few doubt that. Now it has to show shareholders that it can grow and innovate while fighting constant battles on the regulatory front, something arch foe Microsoft failed to do. And it must convince customers that it really is a force for good, not evil. I, for one, hope it succeeds.
David Crow is associate editor of City AM.
What do YOU think? Let us know by clicking here.
The spiked debate, ‘Has Google got too big?’, will take place at the Royal Society of Arts in London between 6.30pm and 8pm on Thursday 18 March. It’s a free debate, but to avoid disappointment book your place NOW: click here.
Previously on spiked
Jason Walsh asked if Google was an anti-capitalist scapegoat? Simon Davies warned that Google might steer us to a ‘privacy Chernobyl’. Andrew Orlowski said we’re all in Google’s crossfire. Rob Killick called Google a frenemy of the internet generation. Or read more at the spiked debate page Has Google got too big?.
To enquire about republishing spiked’s content, a right to reply or to request a correction, please contact the managing editor, Viv Regan.
Want to join the conversation?
Only spiked supporters, who donate regularly to us, can comment on our articles.