Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
survey

abc def ghi jkl mno pqrs tuv wxyz index
Survey home
First thoughts
Final thoughts
Survey responses
RSS feed
Michael Baum
Gustav Born
K Eric Drexler
Marcus du Sautoy
Harold Kroto
Paul Lauterbur
Leon Lederman
Bernard Lovell
Sophie Petit-Zeman
Ingo Potrykus
Jack Pridham
Simon Singh
Jack Steinberger
Martin Livermore
director of the Scientific Alliance, and principal associate at Ascham Associates


Inspiration came gradually. At school, I preferred the practical dimensions of physics and chemistry to the complexities of Latin grammar. At university, chemistry seemed to be a sensible and useful choice of degree. Weekly essays could produce varying levels of inspiration (or not), but one topic stands out in particular.

I attempted, not very successfully, to construct a logical discussion of the second law of thermodynamics, based solely on the concept of increasing entropy. Apart from convincing me that I wasn’t cut out to be an academic, this helped me to realise the power of independent thought, which was certainly an inspiration of sorts.

When it came to getting a job, I found that I wanted to use my scientific training directly in the world of industrial research and development, rather than drifting towards accountancy or marketing. By this stage, you could probably say that the inspiration had crystallised as an intention to keep directly involved in science for good.

Looking back, the main reason for this seems to me to be that science teaches us not to accept everything we are told without question. Rather, science teaches us to take a sceptical view of the world, and to look for and examine evidence. The process of trying to weigh evidence, and draw conclusions as objectively as possible, is a constant source of stimulation.