Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Summer school
Top issues
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Parents and kids
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
a-b c-d e-h i-l m-n o-r s-u v-z index
Tracey Brown
director of Sense About Science

Our ability to develop knowledge scientifically, and to relate to the benefits of that knowledge, depends on having a grasp of how knowledge has advanced through critical thinking and objective study. I really puzzle over how we’ll take forward a tradition of critical thinking for the generation coming along behind me.

The challenge will be how to anticipate a generation schooled in an ever-more suspicious attitude to evidence and ambivalence about the authority of accumulated knowledge. It’s an outlook that, while it’s always hung around, hasn’t really put down roots since the early days of the Renaissance. The way suspicion of knowledge presents itself today is in the challenge of cynicism, conspiracy theories and the ‘celebration’ of perception over objective study. This even lacks the cuteness of the early days of relativism, where at least people had some joy, albeit intellectually barren, in escaping the constraints and discipline of acquiring knowledge. Now, the new cohort is to be born into tired, joyless questions about conspiracies and agendas, in other words creating reality out of your prejudices, instead of trying to develop your thinking to account for reality.

This challenge, which will shape the extent to which society can appreciate and relate to science, will also affect our capacity to deal with changes and work out what their likely impact will be. Fortunately – and this is a big fortune - grasping the counterintuitive nature of a scientifically derived study, confounding our own prejudices and perceptions in any way, is liberating. Contrary to the view of the hero of the popular Clooney film, Good Night and Good Luck, we don’t all have to be prisoners of our own experience and prejudices. At certain moments, there is nothing more exciting than discovering you are wrong. In the absence of much else in public life, we need to make sure this liberating capacity isn’t suffocated out of the next generation by lazy cynicism, where everything is different shades of ‘right’.

Tracey Brown is editor of Peer Review and the Acceptance of New Scientific Ideas (download this book (.pdf 469 KB))

Survey home
What we found
Survey responses
RSS feed
Anjana Ahuja
Michael Baum
Peter Cochrane
Richard Feachem
Frank Furedi
Michio Kaku
Ken MacLeod
Jonathan Meades
Munira Mirza
Matthew Parris
Ingo Potrykus
Roger Scruton
Ben Shneiderman
Lionel Shriver
Raymond Tallis
Peter Whittle
Josie Appleton
David Baulcombe
Claire Fox
William Higham
Paul Lauterbur
William Graeme Laver
Ken MacLeod
Fiona McEwen
Victor Stenger