Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
Wednesday 13 March 2013 Letters
The demise of the Common Law
How feminism made us unequal in the eyes of the law.

Printer-friendly version Email-a-friend Respond

Letters responding to: An unspoken war on the Common Law.

Thank you for your insightful article. Please bear with these untutored comments from a Canadian.

Feminist jurisprudence undermines the equality of all citizens, by establishing favoured and protected citizens - women and girls - and assuming culpability of boys and men before the courts.

In divorce law, ‘violence against women’ legislation, quotas for entry and graduation in education and employment and severe penalties for vaguely defined, perceived female complaints (sexual harassment, hostile
environment, retroactively defined rape) - all undermine equality before the law.

Most rape accusations are based on lack of consent, which exists only in a woman’s mind. Even if apparently consensual at the time, consent may be subsequently revoked, again based on a woman’s mind. Such lack of consent accusations are never litigated against men, who are presumed as always consensual. Increasingly, ‘battered wife syndrome’ (never ‘abused husband syndrome’) is increasingly defined in psychological terms.

Further, fathers are not entitled to rear their children, since over 92 per cent of residential custody cases are granted to divorcing mothers. The wife and mother may offer any or no reason to terminate a marriage. The effective loss of beloved and loving children is a life-shattering loss for father and children.

Jeffrey Asher, Canada

 

15 November 2017
Russia and Brexit: a chattering-class conspiracy theory
16 November 2017
Who represents the 52 per cent?

21 June 2013:
Man of Steel, leaden film


28 June 2013:
Dispatches’ dirty little secret