Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
Friday 8 March 2013 Letters
Postgraduate study
Are MA and PhD students just putting off the world of work?

Printer-friendly version Email-a-friend Respond

Letters responding to: There is no right to be a postgraduate, by Joanna Williams

This article never honestly attempts to consider the actualities of postgraduate study. It fails to address the state of postgraduate funding and grants.

For every student that seeks to stave off ‘confronting adulthood’, there is one who hopes to work in a field that necessitates postgrad study. These include jobs like solicitor, accountant, teacher, barrister, to name just a few for which it’s wholly possible to secure private or government support. This isn’t the case, however, for academic jobs, where students typically have to compete for funding for two postgraduate degrees. It cannot be overlooked that funding for MA programmes is now extremely competitive, much more so than for PhDs.

I have worked nowhere that has offered more than ine full MA scholarship per cohort and (as if those odds weren’t bad enough) MA funding is being cut further (particularly in the humanities). The consequence is that almost all students who cannot self-fund for at least one year stand no chance of gaining a PhD. In this respect, academia is becoming an increasingly closed field, a fact for which this article becomes little more than an embarrassing apologia.

Put simply, it adds insult to injury to say that you shouldn’t work a part-time job to follow your professional ambition. I wonder whether the author would discourage a strong student from following postgraduate study if there wasn’t public funding available. If so, the ideals of ‘scholarship’ and ‘original knowledge’ are just ornaments of an exclusionary system of privilege.

Sadek Kessous, UK

 

14 December 2017
Rita, Sue and #MeToo
15 December 2017
Red Rebels: the spirit of football past – and future?

21 June 2013:
Man of Steel, leaden film


28 June 2013:
Dispatches’ dirty little secret