Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
Wednesday 20 February 2013
Tim Black

Venomous veggies and radical rice


As Western horsemeat-haters lambast modern food production, in Asia it looks set to improve millions of lives.
tweet

Zero: UN Environment Programme

For lovers of irritating puns, the horsemeat scandalette, in which a few putatively beefy products have turned out to feature a hint of equine, has been like a red rag to a bona-fide, DNA-checked bullock. ‘And they’re off’, being a favourite best-before-based word play. But it’s not just the nation’s punners who have made hay while the Sun sensationalises. The horsemeat scandal has also attracted a far less benign social constituency: the misanthropic.

For members of this elite group, be they smug metropolitan media types usually to be found sniffing round Whole Foods, or besuited bureaucrats looking for something to do, the horsemeat scandal is not what it seems. That is, it is not the result of a minority of fraudulent suppliers indulging in the age-old trick of adulteration. That would be too banal, too unscandalous. It would also require too much historical perspective. No, what they see in the horsemeat story is an indictment of us, the consumers, a condemnation of our insatiable desire for cheap food, in particular, cheap meat. That is why horsemeat ended up in a few lasagnes: because our demand for cheap food meant that corners (and hooves, and bums, and testicles) were cut.

And the solution this insufferable contingent propose? Eat less meat. And pay more for it. The United Nations Environment Programme announced: ‘Portion size is key. Many portions are too big, more than you want to eat.’ Eat less, a spokesman continued, ‘make it special’. The UNEP wasn’t alone of course. It was merely the official end of the wedge. At the thicker, more unabashedly snobbish end, broadsheet-dwelling no-marks have been flicking off screeds on ‘the true, titanic horror of modern meat-production’. One even asserted that ‘the case for vegetarianism has grown ever-more urgent, and unanswerable’. According to the Guardian, this message needs to be targeted at the real cause of the horsemeat scandal: ‘people hooked on cheap, easy and overly plentiful food.’ That’s code for you and me, by the way…

tweet

This is a preview from the February edition of spiked plus, our exclusive ‘magazine within a magazine’ for readers who make invaluable contributions to spiked’s fundraising drive. To read the rest of the article, sign in, or sign up, to spiked plus here.


 

Time for a serious debate about the welfare state

Has welfarism gone too far? Is it time to trim this massive machine? And more importantly, shouldn’t it be trimmed for the *right* reasons - that is, not in order to save the state money but as a way of protecting communities from the negative impact of constant welfarist intervention?

We’ll be debating these issues at the next session of our spiked drinks events at Portcullis House in London on Monday 3 June at 6.30pm. Find out more here.



15 May 2013
St Angelina, save
us from ourselves!

14 May 2013
Remember, Fergie is for football, not for life

17 May 2013:
The Star Trek hype? It’s illogical, captain.


17 May 2013:
Don Draper: it’s time to buck your ideas up