Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
survey
a-b c-d e-h i-l m-n o-r s-u v-z index
Ian Abley
architect, researcher at the Modern Masonry Alliance, and co-director of audacity


Architects have long sought to design the minimum dwelling. It was the functionalist Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne (CIAM), which Le Corbusier commanded from inception in 1928, but which collapsed around its tenth congress between 1955 and 1959, that had most notably pursued an Existenzminimum for industrialised households. Establishing a ‘subsistence’ level of housing at a time of inter-war privation and political defeat seemed radical to avant-garde architects like the Czech Marxist Karel Tiege. He went further than many modernist leaders in looking at self-contained industrialised housing for the majority, but it was a popular design preoccupation.

When an estimated one billion squatters in the World’s rapidly growing megacities still lack even modest housing, it might seem enough to propose subsistence standards of development again. That may even be posed as an environmental virtue, when, in the developed world too, we struggle to afford plenty of living space. But it is not enough to preface Existenzminimum with ‘eco’. We all require better than basic, and the potential to mass-produce excellent housing has never been greater than it is today. Homes could be made like any other high performance consumer durable, and at economies of scale that reduce their cost. Housing might be produced for its use value, and designed to be consumed and replaced. Instead, housing is considered more as an exchange value in a speculative market, even when diminutive and dilapidated.

In Britain’s housing boom, consequent on so little housing being built, there is no minimum size for households to be compacted into, and much architectural talent is again focused on exquisitely designed and even manufacturable ‘Microflats’. Orange have one such product - designed by the masterful Richard Horden - the Micro-Compact Home. It is an aluminium cube of less than 7 square metres in area, and a gorgeous but expensive cell. However cheating on useable space without lowering cost is no housing strategy for a growing world population. By 2024 architects must address the harder question of how everyone might afford an upgradeable Macro-home. Or repeat the architectural tragedy of modernism as farce.

Ian Abley is coauthor of Why Is Construction So Backward? (buy this book from Amazon (UK) or Amazon (USA)) and coeditor of Manmade Modular Megastructures (buy this book from Amazon (UK) or Amazon (USA)). See his website.



Survey home
What we found
Survey responses
Feedback
RSS feed
Anjana Ahuja
Michael Baum
Peter Cochrane
Richard Feachem
Frank Furedi
Michio Kaku
Ken MacLeod
Jonathan Meades
Munira Mirza
Matthew Parris
Ingo Potrykus
Roger Scruton
Ben Shneiderman
Lionel Shriver
Raymond Tallis
Peter Whittle
Josie Appleton
David Baulcombe
Claire Fox
William Higham
Paul Lauterbur
William Graeme Laver
Ken MacLeod
Fiona McEwen
Victor Stenger