Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
survey

abc def ghi jkl mno pqrs tuv wxyz index
Survey home
First thoughts
Final thoughts
Survey responses
RSS feed
Michael Baum
Gustav Born
K Eric Drexler
Marcus du Sautoy
Harold Kroto
Paul Lauterbur
Leon Lederman
Bernard Lovell
Sophie Petit-Zeman
Ingo Potrykus
Jack Pridham
Simon Singh
Jack Steinberger
Leslie Rose
founder of Pharmavision Consulting, and consultant clinical scientist


At primary school, we didn’t do any science at all, other than a weekly lesson with the headmaster at which the word ‘science’ was mentioned a couple of times. I was the first person in my entire extended family to make a career of science, or even to take a degree. My parents were not at all scientific, and were rather religious. An abiding memory is of my reading a book about dinosaurs, and my mother very huffily saying: ‘I don’t suppose that book says much about God having anything to do with it.’

At secondary school, I was pitched into the conventional triad of physics, chemistry and biology. I immediately found these subjects interesting, especially the latter two. I was filled with wonder at the incredible complexity of biological systems on such a tiny scale. But I was still dominated by religion, which badly dampened my drive for truth, so that for many years I didn’t really understand what science was as a method. 40 or 50 years ago, science was largely taught as facts.

Much later in life, I developed an understanding of the scientific method, and Richard Dawkins was the first author to help me with that. I then rapidly read other authors such as Carl Sagan, Richard Feynman, Charles Medawar, Steve Jones and Stephen Jay Gould, as well as the philosopher Daniel Dennett.

Once I reached the stage of even thinking about a career, I knew that this career would be in science, and nothing else occurred to me. I just wish I had got serious about science much earlier. I suppose I could say that originally, I inspired myself.