Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
survey

abc def ghi jkl mno pqrs tuv wxyz index
Survey home
First thoughts
Final thoughts
Survey responses
RSS feed
Michael Baum
Gustav Born
K Eric Drexler
Marcus du Sautoy
Harold Kroto
Paul Lauterbur
Leon Lederman
Bernard Lovell
Sophie Petit-Zeman
Ingo Potrykus
Jack Pridham
Simon Singh
Jack Steinberger
Nick Hayward
researcher in the biology of neurodegenerative diseases at the University of Kuopio, member of the Marie Curie Fellowship Association, and recipient of the Intel UK young scientist of the year award


I don’t think any individual teachers, scientists or education systems inspired me to take up science. Rather, science inspired me to take up science.

As a young child, I always had a tendency to be curious, plus a desire to explore. In my teens, I wished to find secure justifications for our explanations and understandings in nature, especially when such understandings can have a huge global impact. At that stage, science provided some truthful and advanced ideas about the natural world. Also, it seemed as though science was one of the few academic subjects that intentionally looked forwards to find new understandings. Such movements seemed to lead to increased academic understanding, and to the development of technologies which seemed of great value in many ways.

I then put some faith in science, perceived it to be of enormous importance for all, and trusted the scientific method. By my late teens and public examinations, I seemed to be quite able at understanding and explaining science in class, and also at thinking beyond the basics I was being taught. I worked hard to secure a rare research opportunity with Pfizer aged only 17, and I managed to bring a systematic, thorough and slightly naïve approach to the project, which became surprisingly successful. The success and acclaim that followed definitely encouraged me to continue studying science.

I’ve always had a strong interest in science, most notably its implications and applications for healthcare. Science helps explain the ‘hows’ and ‘whys’ in nature, and science helps technologies improve. Both of these concepts are fascinating and inspiring.