Home
Mobile version
spiked plus
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Child abuse panic
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Jimmy Savile scandal
Nudge
Obesity
Parents and kids
Population
USA
View all issues...
special feature
The Counter-Leveson Inquiry
other sections
 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
survey

abc def ghi jkl mno pqrs tuv wxyz index
Survey home
Introduction
Survey responses
RSS feed
Anjana Ahuja
Julian Baggini
Philip Ball
Marlene Oscar Berman
Gustav VR Born
K Eric Drexler
Marcus Du Sautoy
Edmond H Fischer
John Hall
Tim Hunt
Wolfgang Ketterle
Leon Lederman
Matt Ridley
Raymond Tallis
Frank Wilczek
Lewis Wolpert
Professor Thomas M Addiscott
soil scientist, computer modeller and science writer


What, for humanity, was the most significant technical innovation of the twentieth century? Was it air travel or space flight, television or computers, or nuclear energy, perhaps? Vaclav Smil (1) argues, and I agree with him, that it was not any of these but the Haber-Bosch process for the synthesis of ammonia. The arithmetic is simple. In 1900, there was virtually no synthetic nitrogen fertiliser, and the world population supported by agriculture then was 1.625 million. Had the process not been developed, only half of the 2000 population could have been fed the generally inadequate diet prevalent in 1900, and only 40 per cent could have enjoyed the current average per capita. Surely no other innovation has enabled so many people to live as nitrogen fertiliser - or had its importance so little understood.

Nitrogen fertiliser is admittedly not an unmixed blessing. Nitrate and nitrous oxide are lost from the soil when it is used, causing algal blooms in coastal waters and damage to stratospheric ozone (2).  But nitrate is not a threat to your health, it’s essential to the working of your body’s defence system against bacterial gastroenteritis (2,3).

Thomas M Addiscott is a soil scientist, computer modeller and science writer.

Suggested reading
1) Smil, V. (2001) Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch, and the Transformation of World Food Production The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

2) Addiscott, T.M. (2005) Nitrate, Agriculture and the Environment CABI Publishing, Wallingford.

3) Benjamin, N (2000) ‘Nitrates in the human diet - good or bad?’ Annales de Zootechnologie 49, 207-216.