Home
Mobile version
About spiked
What is spiked?
Support spiked
spiked shop
Contact us
Advertising
Summer school
Top issues
Abortion
Arab uprisings
British politics
Economy
Environment
For Europe, Against the EU
Free speech
Nudge
Obesity
Obituaries
Occupy protests
Parents and kids
Population
The Stephen Lawrence case
USA
View all issues...

 Letters
 Review of Books
 Monthly archive
selected authors
Duleep Allirajah
Daniel Ben-Ami
Tim Black
Jennie Bristow
Sean Collins
Dr Michael Fitzpatrick
Frank Furedi
Helene Guldberg
Patrick Hayes
Mick Hume
Rob Lyons
Brendan O’Neill
Nathalie Rothschild
James Woudhuysen
more authors...
RSS feed
debate

Draining Africa of healthcare professionals
by William Schabas17 July 2008

There's nothing wrong with African medics wanting a better life, but recruitment policies in the North are hurting poor people in the South.

Africa’s healthcare system is in rough condition. Developed countries are making it worse by draining the continent of healthcare professionals. One in every 10 physicians in the United Kingdom comes from Africa.

That Africa has far fewer healthcare professionals per person should hardly need demonstration. Still, the scale of the problem continues to astonish. In Malawi, for example, the physician-to-population ratio is one per 50,000, more than 100 times the figure for the United Kingdom. For sub-Saharan Africa as a whole, the rate is one doctor for every 8,000. Within Africa itself, there are also enormous disparities between city and countryside.

Recent studies have underscored the gravity of the situation. More than 13,000 physicians trained in sub-Saharan Africa now practise in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States. It is estimated that one third of graduates from state medical schools in Nigeria migrate to Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States within 10 years of graduation. In the year 2000 alone, according to one study, some 500 nurses left Ghana, double the total of nursing graduates in the country that year.

Professionals can hardly be blamed for seeking a better quality of life for themselves and their families, particularly those who live in regions torn by political strife, high crime and violence. But the migration is being actively encouraged by recruiters, and accepted without responsibility by the healthcare systems of wealthy countries.

Many countries develop mechanisms to induce medical professionals to work in regions where needs are greatest. It takes little imagination to devise such schemes. Can we not envisage something comparable, but on a global scale, whereby a package of incentives and penalties can help to improve the situation?

This year marks the sixtieth anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the benchmark for the protection of human dignity. The Declaration recognises both a right to health and a right to benefit from science. And it imposes a duty on everyone to help promote these and other rights.

Today, people readily accept their obligation to protect the environment. We talk of carbon credits and similar mechanisms aimed at discouraging anti-social behaviour in this respect. But we also impose penalties, in the form of higher prices or higher taxes for those who insist on buying automobiles that waste petrol.

So let us do the same with healthcare. Global health is a global responsibility. By draining Africa of its best and brightest, people in the North enhance the quality of their own healthcare, but by damaging that of those who live in the South.

William Schabas is professor of human rights law at the National University of Ireland, Galway and director of the Irish Centre for Human Rights.



From April to July 2008, we asked experts, commentators and spiked readers to nominate the best and worst of medicine. Here's what they told us.

Please note the debate is now closed.