|
|
Rob Lyons
Want to fix the climate? Cut the carbon obsession
Roger Pielke Jr, author of The Climate Fix, tells spiked why it’s wrong to focus on cutting emissions.
|
 |
| Wednesday 27 October 2010 |
Ben Pile
A sideways step from climate panic to Malthus
Recent statements by the Royal Society shows that it has turned from a scientific institution into a nakedly ideological one.
|
 |
| Tuesday 17 August 2010 |
Rob Lyons
Are we facing a second ‘Battle of Kingsnorth’?
The Lib-Cons are finally realising that green rhetoric is all well and good, but it doesn’t keep the lights on.
|
 |
| Monday 19 July 2010 |
Rob Lyons
An oily, underhand demand for censorship
Calling for ExxonMobil to stop funding climate-sceptic groups is really a demand that these groups be silenced.
|
 |
| Wednesday 14 July 2010 |
Colin McInnes
Energy crisis? We’ve been here before
Around 400 years ago, Britain faced another problem of dwindling energy resources: ‘peak wood’.
|
 |
| Tuesday 22 June 2010 |
AW Montford
Climate science after the ‘hockey stick’ affair
The use and abuse of a single graph to justify action on climate change shows the need for healthy scepticism.
|
 |
| Wednesday 9 June 2010 |
Peter Taylor
Meet the green who doubts ‘The Science’
The author of Chill explains why he’s sceptical about manmade global warming — and why greens are so intolerant.
|
 |
| Monday 24 May 2010 |
Tim Black
We must stop saying ‘The science demands...’
Top climate-change expert Mike Hulme tells spiked it is a scandal that scientific claims are increasingly usurping politics and morality.
|
 |
| Monday 26 April 2010 |
Frank Furedi
Why scepticism is still ‘the highest of duties’
Scepticism is widely denounced as a poison and a disease today, just as it was in the Dark Ages. We urgently need to rescue its reputation.
|
 |
| Thursday 15 April 2010 |
Nathalie Rothschild
Using the Holocaust to silence debate
The campaign to make ‘ecocide’ a crime sums up the opportunism and censoriousness of the green lobby.
|
 |
| Wednesday 17 February 2010 |
Brendan O’Neill
The ‘taboo’ they just can’t stop talking about
Article after article after article now tells us that human overpopulation of the planet is the Great Unmentionable. Hmm, something doesn’t add up.
|
 |
| Tuesday 15 December 2009 |
Frank Furedi
Turning children into Orwellian eco-spies
Frank Furedi recalls being educated through fear in Stalinist Hungary, and is disturbed that the same tactics are now used by environmentalists.
|
 |
| Tuesday 15 December 2009 |
Patrick Hayes
It’s the end of the world – again
Environmentalists claiming that the Copenhagen summit is ‘the last chance’ to save the planet sound like a broken record.
|
 |
| Tuesday 15 December 2009 |
Brendan O’Neill
‘We need a planetary one-child policy’
Malthusianism is so widespread that greens can now openly sing the praises of China’s population authoritarianism.
|
 |
| Thursday 10 December 2009 |
Rob Lyons
Turn the clock back to 1875? No thanks
The crazy, progress-stalling carbon cuts being proposed at Copenhagen just aren’t going to happen – and it’s a good thing too.
|
 |
| Monday 7 December 2009 |
Frank Furedi
Treating human beings as little more than carbon
As the Copenhagen summit starts, the rise of eco-Malthusianism shows the anti-human, future-fearing essence of climate-change alarmism.
|
 |
| Monday 7 December 2009 |
Andrew Orlowski
Why the Climategate controversy matters…
The leaked emails suggest that Projection and Anecdote are the key planks of the science of global warming.
|
 |
| Monday 7 December 2009 |
Brendan O’Neill
Why Climategate won't stop climate-change alarmism
Those UEA scientists indulged in dodgy academic activity, but they did not invent the politics of global warming.
|
 |
| Tuesday 24 November 2009 |
Frank Furedi
We don’t need another conspiracy theory
The sceptics poring over those ‘Climategate’ emails are indulging in easy conspiracy-mongering rather than having a tough, grown-up debate.
|
 |
| Wednesday 12 August 2009 |
Rob Lyons
Copenhagen climate deal would be no fairytale
Until we have new technology in place, we can either cut greenhouse gas emissions or tackle poverty — but not both.
|
|
|