Bush isn't the only one who's anti-science
by Stuart Derbyshire
Stuart Derbyshire
The curious rise of anti-religious hysteria
by Frank Furedi
Search for
central
politics
IT
science
liberties
risk
culture
health
life
essays
War on Iraq
After 11 September
spiked-proposals
Global warming
On animals
Genetics
Blood clots
Mad cow panic
Body parts
Foot-and-mouth
Food scares
a-b c-d e-f g-h i-k l-m n-p r-s t-z index
Martin Livermore
science policy and communication consultant, and principal associate at Ascham Associates
The scientific method

There are so many things which, in an ideal world, people should know about science. But there's one thing which underpins the whole of science, and that is the scientific method.

All research scientists - from PhD students, to Galileo Galilei, to Albert Einstein - work by proposing a hypothesis to explain some natural phenomenon, and then setting up controlled experiments to disprove that hypothesis. The essential word here is 'disprove'. If an experiment shows that a hypothesis is wrong, then a new hypothesis must be proposed and tested. This means that nothing in science can ever be 100 per cent proven. Conversely, even established scientific 'facts' can be shown to be wrong, and the boundaries of knowledge extended.

That is the essence of science. Science is not a rigid corpus of knowledge, but a dynamic and changing system, which questions received wisdom and generates new knowledge. And on that basis, human progress is built.

See Martin Livermore's website.




E=mc2 survey home
Why we did it
What we found
Survey responses
Films
Reader responses

EINSTEIN and other marks™ Hebrew University of Jerusalem,
Represented by The Roger Richman Agency, Inc, www.albert-einstein.net

Corrections Terms & Conditions spiked, Signet House, 49-51 Farringdon Road, London, EC1M 3JP
Email:
info@spiked-online.com © spiked 2000-2005 All rights reserved.
spiked is not responsible for the content of any third-party websites.