Down with catastrophism
by Joe Kaplinsky
Joe Kaplinsky
Speciesism: a beastly concept
by Josie Appleton
Search for
central
politics
IT
science
liberties
risk
culture
health
life
essays
Complementary and alternative medicine
(archive)
Drugs and health
(archive)
Plagues of the future?
(archive)
Human body parts
(archive)
Fearing the unknown
(archive)
After Katrina
War on Iraq
War on Terror
Sun, sea
and scaremongering

After 11 September
Global warming
Genetics
Blood clots
Mad cow panic
Foot-and-mouth
Food scares

spiked-risk debates

Sponsored by the Wellcome Trust
Email this article to a friend Join the debate

(This debate is closed and is a read-only archive.)
CAM has been tested in the real world
[22-Jun-2005]
Mark Henderson champions 'the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial', and argues that ' all drugs and procedures are equal'. Many mainstream drugs are in fact derived from plants, and are modified mostly to gain patent protection, in order to divert the lucrative flow of currency towards the already powerful drug companies.

Henderson's statements are misguided at best, and misleading at worst. I take exception to his contribution to this spiked-debate. He would have us believe that allopathic medicine holds all the cards. It does not. But it does hold all the funding for the trials he speaks of, and the research that's required in order to produce the drugs to be tested.

What drug company would be interested in doing a randomised trial on stinging nettle tea? The randomised trials that Henderson refers to are put in place by the drug companies in order to release often dangerous drugs onto the marketplace, with less than 2-3 per cent biased efficacy. These same drugs are often removed from our shelves after the market has been flooded with them, and after the real side-effects from the real-life study - conducted on unwitting people, who are often suffering from serious health problems.

In the real world, we see the real results - not the dubious, manipulated statistical results of some drug company's biased funding. But these real-time results are often buried, along with the real-time corpses that these dangerous products deliver to the patients and families, until it becomes blatantly obvious that there's something seriously wrong.

How then, if Henderson's randomised trial is so efficient, do these toxic chemicals end up in the veins and guts of people and animals - only to be removed from the shelves, when the true nature of their harmful effects is felt by the general public?

Complementary supplements, on the other hand, have been tested in the real world for countless generations, and have been proven safe in the groups of people who have used them over countless generations. There are no skeletons hiding in the complementary food supplements cupboards.

If you honestly believe that plant derivatives can't be used to alleviate health problems, then next time you get acid indigestion, try leaving the salt-packed Gaviscon alone and sip a cup of peppermint tea instead. Not only does peppermint tea ease the immediate acid problems, but if taken regularly over several weeks, one tends to forget what the acid indigestion feels like.

Perhaps a double-blind study would show that peppermint tea surpasses Gaviscon and the multi billion dollar stomach acid indigestion industry. But can you really see peppermint being treated in the same manor that these drugs are funded?

Andrew K Fletcher, UK

View archived list of responses

Email this article to a friend

Debate home
The head-to-head
Peter Fisher
Royal London Homoeopathic Hospital
Mark Henderson
The Times (London)
Charles Pither
RealHealth Institute
Michael Baum
University College London
Robert Harland
Institute of Psychiatry
Lynda Hunter
UK Reiki Federation
View the list of responses

Useful resources
Wellcome Trust policy on complementary and alternative medicine

WHO factsheet traditional healing practices

Complementary and alternative medicine
UK Department of Health


Corrections Terms & Conditions spiked, Signet House, 49-51 Farringdon Road, London, EC1M 3JP
Email:
email spiked © spiked 2000-2006 All rights reserved.
spiked is not responsible for the content of any third-party websites.